Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
03 Oct 2025, 20:03
Kudos
Bookmarks
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 0
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Despite the bilateral nature of the human auditory system, many species, including humans, exhibit lateralized auditory processing. Certain birds, such as zebra finches, favor their right ear when listening for predators, while frogs often respond more to sounds entering their left ear during mating calls. In humans, this asymmetry is most evident in speech processing, which typically engages the left hemisphere. Less apparent, however, is the tendency to react more quickly to sounds entering the right ear. Studies indicate that people prefer to hold phones to their right ear, despite equal hearing capacity in both, suggesting a deeper neural basis for this phenomenon.
Kimura found that individuals asked to recall digits were more accurate when the numbers were presented to their right ear. She suggested that this bias reflected the dominance of the left hemisphere in language processing. However, subsequent research by Bryden proposed that environmental factors, such as handedness, might contribute to ear preference. Despite this, later studies confirmed that the right-ear advantage persisted even when such external factors were controlled, reinforcing the role of hemispheric specialization in auditory tasks and cognitive processing.
Deutsch explored whether this lateralization extended to musical perception. In her study, participants listened to melodies through headphones and were tasked with identifying pitch variations. Right-handed participants consistently performed better when the melodies were presented to the right ear. Deutsch hypothesized that this was due to the left hemisphere’s superior processing of temporal patterns, essential for rhythm and melody recognition, particularly for complex compositions or unfamiliar pieces requiring greater auditory attention.
Not all studies align. Beck suggested that ear preferences might stem from the mechanics of the auditory pathway rather than neural dominance. His experiments exposed participants to speech and non-verbal sounds in soundproof environments. Beck found that while speech favored the right ear, non-verbal stimuli showed no significant ear preference, suggesting differences in how the brain organizes auditory inputs.
To build on this, Beck tested sound localization under varying noise conditions. His findings revealed that, in noisy environments, individuals consistently relied on their right ear regardless of sound type. This suggests that ear preference, while linked to hemispheric specialization, may also reflect situational adaptations, highlighting the complexity and variability of auditory lateralization.
Which of the following is most strongly supported by the findings of Beck’s study?
A. Auditory recall improves when participants hear verbal material through the right ear, even if they are left-handed.
B. In quiet environments, non-verbal sounds show no significant ear preference.
C. The complexity of sound, rather than its classification as speech or non-verbal, determines which hemisphere processes the input.
D. Participants favor their right ear for speech in noisy settings, but only when non-verbal sounds play at the same time.
E. Individuals rely more on their right ear for verbal stimuli in noisy environments, regardless of handedness.
Kimura found that individuals asked to recall digits were more accurate when the numbers were presented to their right ear. She suggested that this bias reflected the dominance of the left hemisphere in language processing. However, subsequent research by Bryden proposed that environmental factors, such as handedness, might contribute to ear preference. Despite this, later studies confirmed that the right-ear advantage persisted even when such external factors were controlled, reinforcing the role of hemispheric specialization in auditory tasks and cognitive processing.
Deutsch explored whether this lateralization extended to musical perception. In her study, participants listened to melodies through headphones and were tasked with identifying pitch variations. Right-handed participants consistently performed better when the melodies were presented to the right ear. Deutsch hypothesized that this was due to the left hemisphere’s superior processing of temporal patterns, essential for rhythm and melody recognition, particularly for complex compositions or unfamiliar pieces requiring greater auditory attention.
Not all studies align. Beck suggested that ear preferences might stem from the mechanics of the auditory pathway rather than neural dominance. His experiments exposed participants to speech and non-verbal sounds in soundproof environments. Beck found that while speech favored the right ear, non-verbal stimuli showed no significant ear preference, suggesting differences in how the brain organizes auditory inputs.
To build on this, Beck tested sound localization under varying noise conditions. His findings revealed that, in noisy environments, individuals consistently relied on their right ear regardless of sound type. This suggests that ear preference, while linked to hemispheric specialization, may also reflect situational adaptations, highlighting the complexity and variability of auditory lateralization.
Which of the following is most strongly supported by the findings of Beck’s study?
A. Auditory recall improves when participants hear verbal material through the right ear, even if they are left-handed.
B. In quiet environments, non-verbal sounds show no significant ear preference.
C. The complexity of sound, rather than its classification as speech or non-verbal, determines which hemisphere processes the input.
D. Participants favor their right ear for speech in noisy settings, but only when non-verbal sounds play at the same time.
E. Individuals rely more on their right ear for verbal stimuli in noisy environments, regardless of handedness.
03 Oct 2025, 20:03
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
Despite the bilateral nature of the human auditory system, many species, including humans, exhibit lateralized auditory processing. Certain birds, such as zebra finches, favor their right ear when listening for predators, while frogs often respond more to sounds entering their left ear during mating calls. In humans, this asymmetry is most evident in speech processing, which typically engages the left hemisphere. Less apparent, however, is the tendency to react more quickly to sounds entering the right ear. Studies indicate that people prefer to hold phones to their right ear, despite equal hearing capacity in both, suggesting a deeper neural basis for this phenomenon.
Kimura found that individuals asked to recall digits were more accurate when the numbers were presented to their right ear. She suggested that this bias reflected the dominance of the left hemisphere in language processing. However, subsequent research by Bryden proposed that environmental factors, such as handedness, might contribute to ear preference. Despite this, later studies confirmed that the right-ear advantage persisted even when such external factors were controlled, reinforcing the role of hemispheric specialization in auditory tasks and cognitive processing.
Deutsch explored whether this lateralization extended to musical perception. In her study, participants listened to melodies through headphones and were tasked with identifying pitch variations. Right-handed participants consistently performed better when the melodies were presented to the right ear. Deutsch hypothesized that this was due to the left hemisphere’s superior processing of temporal patterns, essential for rhythm and melody recognition, particularly for complex compositions or unfamiliar pieces requiring greater auditory attention.
Not all studies align. Beck suggested that ear preferences might stem from the mechanics of the auditory pathway rather than neural dominance. His experiments exposed participants to speech and non-verbal sounds in soundproof environments. Beck found that while speech favored the right ear, non-verbal stimuli showed no significant ear preference, suggesting differences in how the brain organizes auditory inputs.
To build on this, Beck tested sound localization under varying noise conditions. His findings revealed that, in noisy environments, individuals consistently relied on their right ear regardless of sound type. This suggests that ear preference, while linked to hemispheric specialization, may also reflect situational adaptations, highlighting the complexity and variability of auditory lateralization.
Which of the following is most strongly supported by the findings of Beck’s study?
A. Auditory recall improves when participants hear verbal material through the right ear, even if they are left-handed.
B. In quiet environments, non-verbal sounds show no significant ear preference.
C. The complexity of sound, rather than its classification as speech or non-verbal, determines which hemisphere processes the input.
D. Participants favor their right ear for speech in noisy settings, but only when non-verbal sounds play at the same time.
E. Individuals rely more on their right ear for verbal stimuli in noisy environments, regardless of handedness.
A) Incorrect. Beck’s research tracked which ear listeners favored while they were hearing sounds; it never assessed how well they later recalled what they heard. The study also did not record participants’ handedness. Because the option combines an untested variable (memory) with an unmeasured one (left-handed listeners), it stretches far beyond the reported findings.
B) Correct. In the sound-proof portion of Beck’s experiment, speech produced a right-ear advantage, but non-verbal stimuli “showed no significant ear preference.” This choice restates that result in plain terms and does not infer any extra neurological explanation. It captures exactly what the data revealed for non-verbal sounds under quiet conditions.
C) Incorrect. Beck drew his comparison along the line of sound type—verbal versus non-verbal—not sound complexity. He presented simple and complex speech alike in one category and grouped all non-verbal sounds in the other. The study never tested whether more intricate sounds shifted hemisphere use, so claiming “complexity determines processing” adds a factor the passage never mentions.
D) Incorrect. The noisy-room phase showed a consistent right-ear preference for every stimulus, regardless of whether speech and non-verbal sounds were presented together or separately. The option’s caveat “but only when non-verbal sounds play at the same time” invents a condition that the experiment did not impose and that the data do not support.
E) Incorrect. It is true that speech led to right-ear reliance in noise, yet Beck reported that non-verbal sounds behaved the same way under those conditions. By mentioning only verbal stimuli, the option omits half of the noisy-room result. It also asserts “regardless of handedness,” even though handedness was never measured, so the claim extends beyond the evidence.
Answer: B
Despite the bilateral nature of the human auditory system, many species, including humans, exhibit lateralized auditory processing. Certain birds, such as zebra finches, favor their right ear when listening for predators, while frogs often respond more to sounds entering their left ear during mating calls. In humans, this asymmetry is most evident in speech processing, which typically engages the left hemisphere. Less apparent, however, is the tendency to react more quickly to sounds entering the right ear. Studies indicate that people prefer to hold phones to their right ear, despite equal hearing capacity in both, suggesting a deeper neural basis for this phenomenon.
Kimura found that individuals asked to recall digits were more accurate when the numbers were presented to their right ear. She suggested that this bias reflected the dominance of the left hemisphere in language processing. However, subsequent research by Bryden proposed that environmental factors, such as handedness, might contribute to ear preference. Despite this, later studies confirmed that the right-ear advantage persisted even when such external factors were controlled, reinforcing the role of hemispheric specialization in auditory tasks and cognitive processing.
Deutsch explored whether this lateralization extended to musical perception. In her study, participants listened to melodies through headphones and were tasked with identifying pitch variations. Right-handed participants consistently performed better when the melodies were presented to the right ear. Deutsch hypothesized that this was due to the left hemisphere’s superior processing of temporal patterns, essential for rhythm and melody recognition, particularly for complex compositions or unfamiliar pieces requiring greater auditory attention.
Not all studies align. Beck suggested that ear preferences might stem from the mechanics of the auditory pathway rather than neural dominance. His experiments exposed participants to speech and non-verbal sounds in soundproof environments. Beck found that while speech favored the right ear, non-verbal stimuli showed no significant ear preference, suggesting differences in how the brain organizes auditory inputs.
To build on this, Beck tested sound localization under varying noise conditions. His findings revealed that, in noisy environments, individuals consistently relied on their right ear regardless of sound type. This suggests that ear preference, while linked to hemispheric specialization, may also reflect situational adaptations, highlighting the complexity and variability of auditory lateralization.
Which of the following is most strongly supported by the findings of Beck’s study?
A. Auditory recall improves when participants hear verbal material through the right ear, even if they are left-handed.
B. In quiet environments, non-verbal sounds show no significant ear preference.
C. The complexity of sound, rather than its classification as speech or non-verbal, determines which hemisphere processes the input.
D. Participants favor their right ear for speech in noisy settings, but only when non-verbal sounds play at the same time.
E. Individuals rely more on their right ear for verbal stimuli in noisy environments, regardless of handedness.
A) Incorrect. Beck’s research tracked which ear listeners favored while they were hearing sounds; it never assessed how well they later recalled what they heard. The study also did not record participants’ handedness. Because the option combines an untested variable (memory) with an unmeasured one (left-handed listeners), it stretches far beyond the reported findings.
B) Correct. In the sound-proof portion of Beck’s experiment, speech produced a right-ear advantage, but non-verbal stimuli “showed no significant ear preference.” This choice restates that result in plain terms and does not infer any extra neurological explanation. It captures exactly what the data revealed for non-verbal sounds under quiet conditions.
C) Incorrect. Beck drew his comparison along the line of sound type—verbal versus non-verbal—not sound complexity. He presented simple and complex speech alike in one category and grouped all non-verbal sounds in the other. The study never tested whether more intricate sounds shifted hemisphere use, so claiming “complexity determines processing” adds a factor the passage never mentions.
D) Incorrect. The noisy-room phase showed a consistent right-ear preference for every stimulus, regardless of whether speech and non-verbal sounds were presented together or separately. The option’s caveat “but only when non-verbal sounds play at the same time” invents a condition that the experiment did not impose and that the data do not support.
E) Incorrect. It is true that speech led to right-ear reliance in noise, yet Beck reported that non-verbal sounds behaved the same way under those conditions. By mentioning only verbal stimuli, the option omits half of the noisy-room result. It also asserts “regardless of handedness,” even though handedness was never measured, so the claim extends beyond the evidence.
Answer: B
amoeba99
Joined: 19 Feb 2025
Last visit: 18 Apr 2026
Posts: 31
Given Kudos: 21
Location: India
Schools: HBS '26 Stanford '26 Wharton '26
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q90 V89 DI84 
GPA: 7.95
05 Oct 2025, 03:22
Kudos
Bookmarks
There is no Beck mentioned in the passage from what I read. Am I missing something?
