Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Aug 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Save up to $1,000 on select GMAT prep now. This Fall, achieve your most ambitious goals with millions of student success stories behind you.
Aug 2710:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sept. 6, 9:30am-12:30pm EST
Sep 0907:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Oct. 13, 2026 - Jan. 7, 2027, 8:00pm-10:00pm EST
20 Feb 2026, 20:38
Kudos
Bookmarks
In analyzing the fossil record, paleontologists have found that species with broader geographic ranges tend to survive longer than those with more localized habitats. One explanation is that widespread species are more resilient to localized environmental disturbances, such as droughts or disease outbreaks. Consequently, researchers argue that species with larger habitat ranges are more likely to persist over evolutionary timescales than those with limited distribution.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the argument above?
A. Species with broad geographic ranges often experience high levels of genetic divergence across subpopulations, making them more vulnerable to speciation and eventual extinction.
B. Several species that went extinct during past global extinction events had significantly larger habitat ranges than many surviving species.
C. Localized species are often better adapted to niche ecosystems and may evolve specialized traits that increase their chances of surviving specific environmental changes.
D. Fossil evidence is incomplete and may overrepresent species with larger ranges, which are more likely to leave behind fossil traces across regions.
E. Some species with limited geographic ranges have persisted for tens of millions of years without significant change.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the argument above?
A. Species with broad geographic ranges often experience high levels of genetic divergence across subpopulations, making them more vulnerable to speciation and eventual extinction.
B. Several species that went extinct during past global extinction events had significantly larger habitat ranges than many surviving species.
C. Localized species are often better adapted to niche ecosystems and may evolve specialized traits that increase their chances of surviving specific environmental changes.
D. Fossil evidence is incomplete and may overrepresent species with larger ranges, which are more likely to leave behind fossil traces across regions.
E. Some species with limited geographic ranges have persisted for tens of millions of years without significant change.
20 Feb 2026, 20:38
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
In analyzing the fossil record, paleontologists have found that species with broader geographic ranges tend to survive longer than those with more localized habitats. One explanation is that widespread species are more resilient to localized environmental disturbances, such as droughts or disease outbreaks. Consequently, researchers argue that species with larger habitat ranges are more likely to persist over evolutionary timescales than those with limited distribution.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the argument above?
A. Species with broad geographic ranges often experience high levels of genetic divergence across subpopulations, making them more vulnerable to speciation and eventual extinction.
B. Several species that went extinct during past global extinction events had significantly larger habitat ranges than many surviving species.
C. Localized species are often better adapted to niche ecosystems and may evolve specialized traits that increase their chances of surviving specific environmental changes.
D. Fossil evidence is incomplete and may overrepresent species with larger ranges, which are more likely to leave behind fossil traces across regions.
E. Some species with limited geographic ranges have persisted for tens of millions of years without significant change.
The Core Logic of the Argument: To find the correct weakener, we first need to identify the specific conclusion and the evidence used to support it. The argument concludes that species with larger habitat ranges are more likely to persist over evolutionary time. The evidence for this is the "fossil record," which allegedly shows a correlation between broad ranges and longer survival. The author proposes a causal mechanism: broad ranges help species survive localized problems like drought. To weaken this, we need to show that the correlation in the fossil record might be misleading or that the evidence is flawed.
(A) Incorrect. This option suggests that broad ranges lead to speciation (evolving into new species) and eventual extinction. The issue with A is really that it is not connected in any way with a timeline of extinction:
We are not told that high levels of genetic divergence makes them extinct FASTER than those without this issue. We are just told that they are vulnerable to this effect.... but how does it impact their survival rates vs. other species is not specified and thus we are left with a big gap. On the other hand, option D is a more fundamental attack on the evidence itself.
Helpful tip: when a conclusion is backed by direct observational data of the outcome, you weaken by impeaching the data, not by proposing an alternative cause.
(B) Incorrect. This answer choice falls into the "outliers" trap. The argument claims that species with broad ranges "tend" to survive longer—a general statistical trend. Pointing out "several" specific exceptions where widespread species died out does not disprove the general rule. Additionally, this option mentions "global extinction events." The argument specifically argues that broad ranges protect against localized disturbances. Global catastrophes that wipe out the entire planet would kill everything regardless of range size, so this doesn't actually attack the specific logic regarding local resilience.
(C) Incorrect. This option explains why localized species might survive well in stable environments (because they are specialized). However, being "better adapted" to a specific niche is actually a disadvantage when that niche changes or disappears. The argument is about resilience to change over long periods. Just because localized species have advantages in the short term does not mean they survive longer on evolutionary timescales, so this statement does not effectively undermine the conclusion.
(D) Correct. This is the correct answer because it attacks the validity of the data source (the fossil record). The argument relies entirely on the observation that widespread species appear to survive longer in the fossil record. This option points out a "sampling bias": species that live in many different places are simply more likely to leave fossils behind than species that live in only one place. Therefore, widespread species might not actually live longer; they just look like they do because we find more of them. If the evidence is an illusion caused by preservation bias, the conclusion falls apart.
(E) Incorrect. Like Option B, this falls into the "anecdotal evidence" trap. The argument is about a general tendency across all species. Identifying "some" species with limited ranges that managed to survive a long time is merely finding a few exceptions to the rule. A general trend can still be valid even if there are a few exceptions, so this statement is not strong enough to undermine the overall reasoning.
Answer: D
In analyzing the fossil record, paleontologists have found that species with broader geographic ranges tend to survive longer than those with more localized habitats. One explanation is that widespread species are more resilient to localized environmental disturbances, such as droughts or disease outbreaks. Consequently, researchers argue that species with larger habitat ranges are more likely to persist over evolutionary timescales than those with limited distribution.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the argument above?
A. Species with broad geographic ranges often experience high levels of genetic divergence across subpopulations, making them more vulnerable to speciation and eventual extinction.
B. Several species that went extinct during past global extinction events had significantly larger habitat ranges than many surviving species.
C. Localized species are often better adapted to niche ecosystems and may evolve specialized traits that increase their chances of surviving specific environmental changes.
D. Fossil evidence is incomplete and may overrepresent species with larger ranges, which are more likely to leave behind fossil traces across regions.
E. Some species with limited geographic ranges have persisted for tens of millions of years without significant change.
The Core Logic of the Argument: To find the correct weakener, we first need to identify the specific conclusion and the evidence used to support it. The argument concludes that species with larger habitat ranges are more likely to persist over evolutionary time. The evidence for this is the "fossil record," which allegedly shows a correlation between broad ranges and longer survival. The author proposes a causal mechanism: broad ranges help species survive localized problems like drought. To weaken this, we need to show that the correlation in the fossil record might be misleading or that the evidence is flawed.
(A) Incorrect. This option suggests that broad ranges lead to speciation (evolving into new species) and eventual extinction. The issue with A is really that it is not connected in any way with a timeline of extinction:
We are not told that high levels of genetic divergence makes them extinct FASTER than those without this issue. We are just told that they are vulnerable to this effect.... but how does it impact their survival rates vs. other species is not specified and thus we are left with a big gap. On the other hand, option D is a more fundamental attack on the evidence itself.
Helpful tip: when a conclusion is backed by direct observational data of the outcome, you weaken by impeaching the data, not by proposing an alternative cause.
(B) Incorrect. This answer choice falls into the "outliers" trap. The argument claims that species with broad ranges "tend" to survive longer—a general statistical trend. Pointing out "several" specific exceptions where widespread species died out does not disprove the general rule. Additionally, this option mentions "global extinction events." The argument specifically argues that broad ranges protect against localized disturbances. Global catastrophes that wipe out the entire planet would kill everything regardless of range size, so this doesn't actually attack the specific logic regarding local resilience.
(C) Incorrect. This option explains why localized species might survive well in stable environments (because they are specialized). However, being "better adapted" to a specific niche is actually a disadvantage when that niche changes or disappears. The argument is about resilience to change over long periods. Just because localized species have advantages in the short term does not mean they survive longer on evolutionary timescales, so this statement does not effectively undermine the conclusion.
(D) Correct. This is the correct answer because it attacks the validity of the data source (the fossil record). The argument relies entirely on the observation that widespread species appear to survive longer in the fossil record. This option points out a "sampling bias": species that live in many different places are simply more likely to leave fossils behind than species that live in only one place. Therefore, widespread species might not actually live longer; they just look like they do because we find more of them. If the evidence is an illusion caused by preservation bias, the conclusion falls apart.
(E) Incorrect. Like Option B, this falls into the "anecdotal evidence" trap. The argument is about a general tendency across all species. Identifying "some" species with limited ranges that managed to survive a long time is merely finding a few exceptions to the rule. A general trend can still be valid even if there are a few exceptions, so this statement is not strong enough to undermine the overall reasoning.
Answer: D
28 Mar 2026, 04:36
Kudos
Bookmarks
Appreciate the question.
I was wondering if it would be possible to see the relative option attempt percentage in the gmat club test solution as well.
I find it useful to see what are the options for which usually are wrong as might be traps and to avoid in future.
Survey. Analysis.
I know i can just navigate to forum
I was wondering if it would be possible to see the relative option attempt percentage in the gmat club test solution as well.
I find it useful to see what are the options for which usually are wrong as might be traps and to avoid in future.
Survey. Analysis.
I know i can just navigate to forum
