Official Solution:
Archaeologists excavating an early agrarian settlement discovered a concentrated deposit of charred animal bones at the center of the site. The bones represent several different species and show varying degrees of burning. The deposit may be the remnants of communal food preparation - animals slaughtered and cooked during large gatherings of the settlement's inhabitants. Alternatively, the deposit may represent the remains of ritual animal sacrifices, in which animals were burned whole as offerings during religious ceremonies.
In order to help decide between the two hypotheses about the origin of the bone deposit, which of the following would it be most useful to know?
A. Whether similar deposits of charred animal bones have been found at other settlements in the same region
B. Whether the bones belong to animal species that were commonly hunted for food in the surrounding region
C. Whether the bones display cut marks of the kind produced when animals are butchered for the removal of meat
D. Whether the deposit contains bones from animals of various ages or predominantly from animals in their prime
E. Whether written or artistic records from contemporary cultures depict animals being used in religious ceremonies
The passage presents two hypotheses for the origin of the bone deposit: communal food preparation, or ritual sacrifice in which animals were burned whole. The "burned whole" specification matters — it means that physical evidence of butchering on the bones would directly contradict the ritual hypothesis. The correct answer must present a question whose yes/no answer shifts the balance between the two hypotheses.
(A) Incorrect. Whether similar deposits exist at other settlements tells us about prevalence, not about the function of this specific deposit. Both hypotheses could produce regional patterns, so this information does not discriminate between them.
(B) Incorrect. Animals used in ritual sacrifice across most ancient cultures were typically the same species people ate — domesticated livestock and game already in the food economy. The species being "commonly hunted for food" is consistent with both hypotheses, so learning this would not discriminate between them.
(C) Correct. Cut marks of the kind produced during butchering would indicate that the animals were prepared for meat removal, contradicting the ritual hypothesis (which specifies whole-animal burning) and supporting the food preparation hypothesis. The absence of cut marks would be consistent with whole-animal burning and would weaken the food preparation hypothesis, though not eliminate it. Either answer shifts the balance between the two hypotheses, so this information is directly useful.
(D) Incorrect. Animal age distribution can carry some signal — ritual sacrifice in many cultures preferentially used animals in their prime, while food preparation typically drew from animals of various ages. So this information would help discriminate to some degree. However, (C) is more decisive: with the ritual hypothesis specifying that animals were burned whole, the presence or absence of butchering cut marks directly tests the ritual hypothesis. Age distribution is a tendency; cut marks are a near-defining marker. (D) helps, but (C) helps more.
(E) Incorrect. Records establish whether ritual sacrifice was a known practice in the culture, which adjusts the prior probability of the ritual hypothesis. Confirming records would raise that probability; their absence would lower it. So (E) does provide some discrimination. However, this is contextual evidence about the culture, not direct evidence about this specific deposit. Even with confirming records, these particular bones might still be food remnants; without records, they might still be sacrificial. (C) tests the deposit itself and is therefore more useful.
Answer: C