GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Oct 2019, 12:34

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

V31-01

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Current Student
User avatar
V
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4262
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
V31-01  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Apr 2018, 08:22
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

41% (01:45) correct 59% (02:13) wrong based on 17 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A significant drop in the number of accidents caused by impaired driving due to cell phone use is chiefly a result of aggressive public awareness efforts on the part of the government as well as the cell phone industry itself. A new marketing campaign by a major telecommunications firm emphasizes the ways in which a cell phone should and should not be used by drivers. However, some public safety experts are concerned that this will lead drivers to become overconfident in their ability to handle both tasks and will increase the number of accidents. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the objections that public safety experts have to the new marketing campaign?

A. The number of people who use their cell phones while driving has decreased since the marketing campaign began.
B. The marketing campaign is part of an effort to increase the sales of a new type of phone that was specifically designed to be used without drivers needing to look at or touch the phone at all.
C. The drop in the number of accidents caused by impaired driving due to cell phone use is especially large among younger drivers.
D. Studies conducted by public safety experts have shown that most people are not good judges of how well they can handle cell phone use while driving.
E. Initial reports have shown that most people who have been exposed to the marketing campaign have modified their driving habits in beneficial ways.

_________________
Current Student
User avatar
V
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4262
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re V31-01  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Apr 2018, 08:22
Official Solution:

A significant drop in the number of accidents caused by impaired driving due to cell phone use is chiefly a result of aggressive public awareness efforts on the part of the government as well as the cell phone industry itself. A new marketing campaign by a major telecommunications firm emphasizes the ways in which a cell phone should and should not be used by drivers. However, some public safety experts are concerned that this will lead drivers to become overconfident in their ability to handle both tasks and will increase the number of accidents. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the objections that public safety experts have to the new marketing campaign?

A. The number of people who use their cell phones while driving has decreased since the marketing campaign began.
B. The marketing campaign is part of an effort to increase the sales of a new type of phone that was specifically designed to be used without drivers needing to look at or touch the phone at all.
C. The drop in the number of accidents caused by impaired driving due to cell phone use is especially large among younger drivers.
D. Studies conducted by public safety experts have shown that most people are not good judges of how well they can handle cell phone use while driving.
E. Initial reports have shown that most people who have been exposed to the marketing campaign have modified their driving habits in beneficial ways.

CR Box: W. This is a weaken question, but one must be clear as to whose argument we are trying to weaken -- the public safety experts, not the author of the passage

1 BID (Boil It Down): The marketing campaign shows how drivers can use a cell phone. The marketing campaign will lead drivers to become overconfident in their ability to drive and use a cell phone, leading to more accidents.

2 Destroy the underlying reasoning Likely: Showing drivers how they can use a cell phone will NOT lead people to improperly use their phones while driving.

Choice E is correct. This directly attacks the safety experts' conclusion. If most people who have been exposed to the marketing campaign drive more safely, then those drivers will get in fewer accidents, not more.

Choice A might lead to fewer accidents, but there is no known connection to the marketing campaign. How many people have seen it and how have they responded? The campaign could still, as the experts say, lead to more accidents.

Choice B tells us that the campaign was not just about saving lives. That has no effect on the argument. It also suggests that the design of the new phones might lead to safer driving, but that doesn't tell us anything definite about the effect of the campaign.

Choice C is pure background information, and as such, has no bearing on the conclusion.

Choice D, if anything, supports the point of view of the safety experts whose opinion we are trying to weaken. If people cannot judge their own ability to drive and use a phone, then the new campaign could be a problem (though not necessarily). The main point here is that this choice does not weaken the experts' position.



Answer: E
_________________
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 10 Apr 2018
Posts: 240
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.3
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
V31-01  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 13 Oct 2019, 05:12
I think this is a poor-quality question and I don't agree with the explanation. Option E mentions that drivers have improved their driving habits in a beneficial way, however, since it's not mentioned what aspect of driving has improved, we can't say for sure whether the cell phone use has reduced or not. It could be that drivers are not following their lane better or some other aspect of driving has improved. Therefore, I don't think that this option is correct.

As a result of my above explanation, Option A stands out as the right answer for me as it's closer to the scope of the question.

Kindly discuss my feedback.

Originally posted by iamsiddharthkapoor on 20 Dec 2018, 19:56.
Last edited by iamsiddharthkapoor on 13 Oct 2019, 05:12, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 14 Jun 2019
Posts: 3
Re: V31-01  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2019, 00:32
I agree
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 27 Feb 2017
Posts: 42
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V38
Re: V31-01  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2019, 22:18
Well, Not really. Option A does not say anything that suggests that the decrease in accidents is attributed to the marketing campaign. I believe the correct answer is E.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: V31-01   [#permalink] 21 Sep 2019, 22:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

V31-01

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: chetan2u, Bunuel






Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne