Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 2110:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Make the most of your break with the most realistic GMAT™ prep. Take up to $700 off select products.
May 2211:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code PICNIC - Expires on Monday, May 25th
May 2512:01 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Use code MEMORIAL15 for 15% off Target Test Prep GMAT plans and get the only prep course rated 5 stars on GMAT Club. Offer valid 5/25 and 5/26 only.
May 2512:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 25th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PST- Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
14 Feb 2022, 03:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
City councilperson: Last year, our town paid for a robust social media campaign to publicize the dangers of nicotine vaping to teens. The campaign was in large part funded by a tax levied on all tobacco and nicotine products purchased in town. Therefore, the campaign should be self-sufficient for as long as there is a concern regarding the number of teens vaping in our town.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the city councilperson’s argument?
A. Residents of the town in question do not purchase tobacco or nicotine products in any significant quantity from other localities.
B. Recent surveys have indicated that teens living in the councilperson’s town are more likely to vape than are teens in neighboring cities.
C. Tobacco use in the councilperson’s town has declined greatly since vaping products have become more readily available in the marketplace.
D. Other social media campaigns sponsored by the town in question have had mixed results.
E. Many voters in the town doubt the necessity of the social media campaign to publicize the dangers of vaping to teens.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the city councilperson’s argument?
A. Residents of the town in question do not purchase tobacco or nicotine products in any significant quantity from other localities.
B. Recent surveys have indicated that teens living in the councilperson’s town are more likely to vape than are teens in neighboring cities.
C. Tobacco use in the councilperson’s town has declined greatly since vaping products have become more readily available in the marketplace.
D. Other social media campaigns sponsored by the town in question have had mixed results.
E. Many voters in the town doubt the necessity of the social media campaign to publicize the dangers of vaping to teens.
14 Feb 2022, 03:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
City councilperson: Last year, our town paid for a robust social media campaign to publicize the dangers of nicotine vaping to teens. The campaign was in large part funded by a tax levied on all tobacco and nicotine products purchased in town. Therefore, the campaign should be self-sufficient for as long as there is a concern regarding the number of teens vaping in our town.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the city councilperson’s argument?
A. Residents of the town in question do not purchase tobacco or nicotine products in any significant quantity from other localities.
B. Recent surveys have indicated that teens living in the councilperson’s town are more likely to vape than are teens in neighboring cities.
C. Tobacco use in the councilperson’s town has declined greatly since vaping products have become more readily available in the marketplace.
D. Other social media campaigns sponsored by the town in question have had mixed results.
E. Many voters in the town doubt the necessity of the social media campaign to publicize the dangers of vaping to teens.
Choice A: Yes. That residents of the town in question do not purchase tobacco or nicotine products in any significant quantity from other localities. would strengthen the councilperson’s argument by showing that continued tobacco and nicotine use by the town’s teens would continue to fund the social media campaign by way of steady tax revenues.
Choice B: No. That teens living in the councilperson’s town are more likely to vape than are teens in neighboring cities has no definitive impact on the argument.
Choice C: No. That tobacco use has declined has no definitive impact on the argument.
Choice D: No. That other social media campaigns have had mixed results would at best weaken the conclusion about the social media campaign.
Choice E: No. What many voters doubt would have no definitive impact on the argument.
Answer: A
City councilperson: Last year, our town paid for a robust social media campaign to publicize the dangers of nicotine vaping to teens. The campaign was in large part funded by a tax levied on all tobacco and nicotine products purchased in town. Therefore, the campaign should be self-sufficient for as long as there is a concern regarding the number of teens vaping in our town.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the city councilperson’s argument?
A. Residents of the town in question do not purchase tobacco or nicotine products in any significant quantity from other localities.
B. Recent surveys have indicated that teens living in the councilperson’s town are more likely to vape than are teens in neighboring cities.
C. Tobacco use in the councilperson’s town has declined greatly since vaping products have become more readily available in the marketplace.
D. Other social media campaigns sponsored by the town in question have had mixed results.
E. Many voters in the town doubt the necessity of the social media campaign to publicize the dangers of vaping to teens.
Choice A: Yes. That residents of the town in question do not purchase tobacco or nicotine products in any significant quantity from other localities. would strengthen the councilperson’s argument by showing that continued tobacco and nicotine use by the town’s teens would continue to fund the social media campaign by way of steady tax revenues.
Choice B: No. That teens living in the councilperson’s town are more likely to vape than are teens in neighboring cities has no definitive impact on the argument.
Choice C: No. That tobacco use has declined has no definitive impact on the argument.
Choice D: No. That other social media campaigns have had mixed results would at best weaken the conclusion about the social media campaign.
Choice E: No. What many voters doubt would have no definitive impact on the argument.
Answer: A
25 May 2026, 02:05
Kudos
Bookmarks
Choice A feels difficult. Because it states that - Residents of the town in question do not purchase tobacco or nicotine products in any significant quantity from other localities. What happens if it does? Say, residents do purchase significant quantity from other locality outside town. Even last year and same continues going ahead as well. And if last year the campaign cost was recovered from whatever collection that happened out of taxes on tobacco, even this year could same happen. Whether or not significant purchasing is done from other locality or not. I dont think the statement strengthens the logic in any way
