Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 18:20

It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 18:20

Toolkit

Practice Tests

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Apr 26
Score High on the GMAT with Target Test Prep
10:00 AM EDT
-
11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 27
Try OnDemand GMAT Masterclass
11:00 AM EDT
-
12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 28
Join - GMAT Day!
08:00 AM PDT
-
11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.

Back to Forum

Create Topic

V37-10

1 2

hr1212

GMAT Forum Director

Joined: 18 Apr 2019

Last visit: 24 Apr 2026

Posts: 925

Own Kudos:

1,337

[2]

Given Kudos: 2,217

GMAT Focus 1: 775 Q90 V85 DI90 Verified score

Products:

Expert

Expert reply

GMAT Focus 1: 775 Q90 V85 DI90 Verified score

Posts: 925

Kudos: 1,337

[2]

26 Oct 2025, 04:19

Kudos

Bookmarks

Idea here is to spot the difference on what else could have changed b/w last year and this year apart from interactive digital displays. Choice A is a trap because it's just describing a reason about what customers generally prefer ie. variety of shopping and dining options which they would have anyways done last year, so that doesn't help us in explaining the noticeable increase. If we can somehow figure out that there was a general increase in tourism this year compared to last year due to some other reason and digital displays have no significant impact, then that would be a strong weakener. That thought is successfully captured by option C.

MaitriD

I don’t quite agree with the solution. The solution says option A is trap answer as it suggests that other attractions draw in visitors but we need to spe4cifically negate the increase of visitors.

But then how are we choosing option C which is similar to A providing an alternative explanation for increase in the no. of visitors?

MaitriD

Joined: 13 Jun 2024

Last visit: 28 Dec 2025

Posts: 33

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 21

Posts: 33

Kudos: 21

26 Oct 2025, 04:29

Kudos

Bookmarks

makes sense, thank you!

hr1212

quialias

Joined: 01 Sep 2025

Last visit: 11 Feb 2026

Posts: 15

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 22

Posts: 15

Kudos: 2

29 Oct 2025, 00:14

Kudos

Bookmarks

I like the solution - it’s helpful.

Founder

Joined: 04 Dec 2002

Last visit: 24 Apr 2026

Posts: 43,155

Own Kudos:

83,725

Given Kudos: 24,680

Location: United States

GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42 Verified score

GPA: 3

Products:

Expert

Expert reply

GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42 Verified score

Posts: 43,155

Kudos: 83,725

29 Oct 2025, 12:53

Kudos

Bookmarks

I personally think / feel this is a bit of an evil question - it is definitely created to trick people up. I am not sure how I feel about it to be honest. I think it is valuable if you can past the trickiness but I was a bit frazzled by it as I fixated on A so much.... so maybe a good lesson but I hate learning lessons

kartickdey

Joined: 13 Sep 2024

Last visit: 22 Apr 2026

Posts: 207

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 403

Location: India

Products:

Posts: 207

Kudos: 10

07 Feb 2026, 06:50

Kudos

Bookmarks

Regarding option B: it might happen that the increase in visitors is because of the popular attractions and dining areas, not because of the digital displays, providing an alternate cause and thus weakening the conclusion. If the popular attractions and dining areas were also there last year, then it is fine. This does not weaken. But nothing has been mentioned about that in the passage.

B. The interactive digital displays are often located near popular attractions and dining areas, potentially influencing visitor traffic patterns in their vicinity.

Thank yoy for the question. I will improve the explanation to address this point.

There are 3 issues with B:
1. It uses the word potentially, which is indicating uncertainty - this is a red flag right away but it is not quite enough usually for me to completely rule it out, just shows this is a WEAK choice.

2. The main reason to rule B out is that it does not undermine the argument. It almost strengthens it, saying that digital displays brought people in. We are trying to disprove the point and say that displays did little or nothing to attract more visitors or keep them there longer.

3. Finally, we are not given any information about the increase in number of visitors. We actually don't even know if the displays are influencing the patterns positively or negatively - they may be scaring people away

Bottom line: We want a choice that says more people came in for a reason OTHER than displays.

AbhishekP220108

Joined: 04 Aug 2024

Last visit: 24 Apr 2026

Posts: 504

Own Kudos:

215

Given Kudos: 137

GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V78 DI74 Verified score

Products:

GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V78 DI74 Verified score

Posts: 504

Kudos: 215

07 Feb 2026, 19:37

Kudos

Bookmarks

B. The interactive digital displays are often located near popular attractions and dining areas, potentially influencing visitor traffic patterns in their vicinity.

Option B States interactive digital displays are often placed nearby to the places that are popular places and influences visitors patterns. If this is the case then it somewhat strengthens the leaders conclusion. However the problem with this option is that we know nothing whether the no. Of visitors increased or decreased. So it cannot weaken.

kartickdey

Aaryan1004

Joined: 22 Apr 2026

Last visit: 22 Apr 2026

Posts: 1

Kudos: 0

22 Apr 2026, 12:43

Kudos

Bookmarks

I don’t quite agree with the solution. The question explicitly states to negate the conclusion not the argument which is "The initiative's leaders concluded that the interactive digital displays were key in attracting and retaining more visitors". Both option A&C provide alternative to influx of visitors but option A targets the interactive display part better. In option C, one might also infer the "entertainment" attractions consists of these displays aswell

AbhishekP220108

Joined: 04 Aug 2024

Last visit: 24 Apr 2026

Posts: 504

Own Kudos:

215

[1]

Given Kudos: 137

GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V78 DI74 Verified score

Products:

GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V78 DI74 Verified score

Posts: 504

Kudos: 215

[1]

24 Apr 2026, 09:54

Kudos

Bookmarks

Hi Aaryan1004 let me try to help

Lets look into the argument 1st and then we will analyse the option A and C

In a large urban area, an initiative was launched to integrate interactive digital displays, such as touch-screen information kiosks and augmented reality experiences, in various public spaces. Following the implementation of this initiative, there was a noticeable increase in the number of visitors and the duration of their stay in these areas compared to last year. The initiative's leaders concluded that the interactive digital displays were key in attracting and retaining more visitors.

Premise 1-an initiative was launched to integrate interactive digital displays, such as touch-screen information kiosks and augmented reality experiences, in various public spaces

Premise 2- Following the implementation of this initiative, there was a noticeable increase in the number of visitors and the duration of their stay in these areas compared to last year

Conclusion-the interactive digital displays were key in attracting and retaining more visitors.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the initiative leaders’ conclusion?

The question asks to find option which most seriously weakens as in the option choice that can make us belief less in the conclusion. Weaken doesnt always mean we have to negate the conclusion. The option that negates thats a strong weakner which directly negated version of an assumption. However, if the question asks to most seriously undermines we have to check which is that option that can shake our belief on the conclusion.

Now over to argument missing gap

So initiative leader concluded about the interactive displays that this is the key element in the increase of visitors. He has considered the classic correlation as causation and ignored all the other factor. So we have find which one is the other factor

A. Surveys reveal that the primary attraction for visitors to these urban areas remains the variety of shopping and dining options available, rather than the interactive digital displays.- this option says the primary attraction for visitors not the primary reasons to attract. Even though if they are primary attraction this can be the possibility that after the installation the visitors increased because of interactive displays. So this is not the weakner

C. The urban area has seen an overall increase in tourism due to a city-wide marketing campaign promoting its cultural and entertainment attractions.-whereas this tells that the increase in visitors no. happened because of something else and makes us question on the interactive displays role. So this is weakening the most in comparison to other option given

Hope this helps

Aaryan1004