The Key to This Question:This is an
Evaluate the Argument question. We need to find what information would help us judge if the argument works.
The Argument's Logic:- Few students use the school breakfast program
- Students who skip breakfast learn worse
-
Therefore: Increase program participation → better learning
The Hidden Gap:The argument assumes that students who
don't use the school program are
not eating breakfast at all.
But
these are NOT the same thing!What if students are eating breakfast at home? Then they're already getting the learning benefits of breakfast. The school program wouldn't change anything.
Why B is Correct:Answer B asks the critical question: How many students eat breakfast at home?
Simple Test:- If
many eat at home → The plan
won't help learning (they already have breakfast)
- If
few eat at home → The plan
will help learning (they truly need breakfast)
This is exactly what an "evaluate" answer should do - give us information that could either
strengthen or
weaken the argument depending on the answer.
Why Other Choices Fail:(A) What students
think about breakfast doesn't tell us if they
eat it
(C) Awareness of the program doesn't tell us if increasing participation helps learning
(D) Students who don't attend school are irrelevant to this plan
(E) Other towns' data doesn't evaluate
this argument
Answer: BTakeaway: In Evaluate questions, find the
gap between evidence and conclusion. The correct answer will test whether that gap exists or not.