Hello everyone,
Got 4/5 correct in 12:30 minutes, including 6 minutes to read the passage.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------P1The author starts with presenting a situation: the evidence that has been so far used to detail the change in the Irish landscape is incomplete and sometimes out of scope.
Purpose: The purpose of this paragraph is to claim that the evidence so fare been used for spotting changes in the Irish landscape is incomplete.
P2In this paragraph the author presents a method that can be used to compensate for the incomplete evidence so far been available. The method involves the analysis of fossilized pollen grain in the fields. Such presence tells us about when and which plant was planted.
Purpose: The purpose of this paragraph is to present a method that can compensate for the incompleteness of the evidence so far been used
P3Paragraph 3 offers an example in which the analysis of pollen helped to clarify/correct what previously historians thought.
In a particular place pollen was found in 400 AD but scholars thought that cultivation started in the 7th century with the introduction of a plough.
Purpose: The purpose of this paragraph is to give an example of the application of the studies of pollen on a given scenario
P4Paragraph 4 is very similar paragraph 3. We are given that scholars think that Flax was cultivated in particular location in Ireland before the 18th century because it is known that in general in Ireland Flax was cultivated before the 18th century. The analysis of pollen reveals on the other hand that in that particular region flax was cultivated starting from the 18th century.
Purpose: The purpose of this paragraph is to explain how through the analysis of pollen a wrong belief of scholars has been corrected
P5In the last paragraph the author claims that there are some limitations to the usage of pollen analysis. One of these limitations is that pollen analysis reveal only the family of the plant and not the exact species.
Purpose: The purpose of the last paragraph is to highlight one limitation of pollen analysis
Main point
The main point of this passage is to claim that through pollen analysis, even tough limited, many beliefs regarding the change in the Irish landscape can be corrected or modified.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?
Pre-thinking
Main point question
The main point of this passage is to claim that through pollen analysis, even tough limited, many beliefs regarding the change in the Irish landscape can be corrected or modified.
(A) Analysis of fossilized pollen is a useful means of supplementing and in some cases correcting other sources of information regarding changes in the Irish landscape.
In line with pre.thinking
(B) Analyses of historical documents, together with pollen evidence, have led to the revision of some previously accepted hypotheses regarding changes in the Irish landscape.
The main point does not focus on the documents
(C) Analysis of fossilized pollen has proven to be a valuable tool in the identification of ancient plant species.
Ancient plants? Out of scope
(D) Analysis of fossilized pollen has provided new evidence that the cultivation of such crops as cereal grains, flax, and madder had a significant impact on the landscape of Ireland.
The impact of such plants is out of scope
(E) While pollen evidence can sometimes supplement other sources of historical information, its applicability is severely limited, since it cannot be used to identify plant species.
This option is both part scope and correct. Partial scope because it refers only to the last paragraph and incorrect because the author never claims that the limitation is severe. Such language is too extreme.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. The passage indicates that pollen analyses have provided evidence against which one of the following views?
Pre-thinking
Inference question
We need to evaluate the single options as the question seems to be very broad.
(A) The moldboard plough was introduced into Ireland in the seventh century.
Fact, not an inference
(B) In certain parts of County Down, cereal grains were not cultivated to any significant extent before the seventh century.
From P2: " soils were not tilled to
any significant extent until the introduction of the
moldboard plough to Ireland in the seventh century
A.D."
(C) In certain parts of Ireland, cereal grains have been cultivated continuously since the introduction of the moldboard plough.
Continuously cannot be inferred here
(D) Cereal grain cultivation requires successful tilling of the soil.
Cannot be inferred because the tilling aspect regards a specific kind of soil
(E) Cereal grain cultivation began in County Down around 400 A.D.
Cannot be inferred
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. The phrase “documentary record” (lines 20 and 37) primarily refers to
Pre-thinking
Function question
Clearly to all those documents used by scholars to make conclusions about the change in landscapes in Ireland
(A) documented results of analyses of fossilized pollen
Not in line with pre-thinking
(B) the kinds and quantities of fossilized pollen grains preserved in peats and lake muds
Not in line with pre-thinking
(C) written and pictorial descriptions by current historians of the events and landscapes of past centuries
Not in line with pre-thinking
(D) government and commercial records, maps, and similar documents produced in the past that recorded conditions and events of that time
in line with pre-thinking
(E) articles, books, and other documents by current historians listing and analyzing all the available evidence regarding a particular historical period
Not in line with pre-thinking
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. The passage indicates that prior to the use of pollen analysis in the study of the history of the Irish landscape, at least some historians believed which one
of the following?
Pre-thinking
Inference question
Let's analyze the options:
(A) The Irish landscape had experienced significant flooding during the seventeenth century.
Cannot be inferred
(B) Cereal grain was not cultivated anywhere in Ireland until at least the seventh century.
Cannot be inferred
(C) The history of the Irish landscape during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries was well documented.
[b]Cannot be inferred[/b]
(D) Madder was not used as a dye plant in Ireland until after the eighteenth century.
Cannot be inferred
(E) The beginning of flax cultivation in County Down may well have occurred before the eighteenth century.
From P3: "The record of eighteenth-century linen
(40) production in Down, together with the knowledge that
flax cultivation had been established in Ireland
centuries before that time, led some historians to
surmise that this plant was being cultivated in Down
before the eighteenth century."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship between the second paragraph and the final paragraph?
Pre-thinking
Function question
P2---->Purpose: The purpose of this paragraph is to present a method that can compensate for the incompleteness of the evidence so far been used
P5---->Purpose: The purpose of the last paragraph is to highlight one limitation of pollen analysis
One paragraph proposes a methodology and the last paragraph highlights a limitation of such methodology
(A) The second paragraph proposes a hypothesis for which the final paragraph offers a supporting example.
no supporting example
(B) The final paragraph describes a problem that must be solved before the method advocated in the second paragraph can be considered viable.
The limitation must not be resolved per the author
(C) The final paragraph qualifies the claim made in the second paragraph.
Qualifies means here to give a qualifications whether is bad or good. Correct
(D) The second paragraph describes a view against which the author intends to argue, and the final paragraph states the author’s argument against that view.
out of scope
(E) The final paragraph offers procedures to supplement the method described in the second paragraph.
procedures are not discussed here
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------It's a great day to be alive!