Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
16 Nov 2020, 04:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
Question 1
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
75% (02:50) correct
25%
(03:03) wrong
based on 459
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 2
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
44% (01:29) correct 56%
(01:25) wrong
based on 517
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 3
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
43% (01:32) correct 57%
(01:39) wrong
based on 470
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 4
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
63% (00:58) correct 37%
(01:07) wrong
based on 454
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 5
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
85%
(hard)
Question Stats:
41% (01:30) correct 59%
(01:36) wrong
based on 445
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 6
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
65%
(hard)
Question Stats:
50% (01:38) correct 50%
(01:28) wrong
based on 420
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 7
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
5%
(low)
Question Stats:
91% (00:43) correct 9%
(01:07) wrong
based on 382
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 8
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
69% (00:44) correct 31%
(00:50) wrong
based on 398
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Between June 1987 and May 1988, the bodies of at
least 740 bottlenose dolphins out of a total coastal
population of 3,000 to 5,000 washed ashore on the
Atlantic coast of the United States. Since some of the
(5) dead animals never washed ashore, the overall disaster
was presumably worse; perhaps 50 percent of the
population died. A dolphin die-off of this character and
magnitude had never before been observed;
furthermore, the dolphins exhibited a startling range of
(10) symptoms. The research team that examined the die-
off noted the presence of both skin lesions and internal
lesions in the liver, lung, pancreas, and heart, which
suggested a massive opportunistic bacterial infection of
already weakened animals.
(15) Tissues from the stricken dolphins were analyzed
for a variety of toxins. Brevetoxin, a toxin produced by
the blooming of the alga Ptychodiscus brevis, was
present in eight out of seventeen dolphins tested. Tests
for synthetic pollutants revealed that polychlorinated
(20) biphenyls (PCBs) were present in almost all animals
tested.
The research team concluded that brevetoxin
poisoning was the most likely cause of the illnesses
that killed the dolphins. Although P. brevis is
(25) ordinarily not found along the Atlantic coast, an
unusual bloom of this organism—such blooms are
called “red tides” because of the reddish color imparted
by the blooming algae—did occur in the middle of the
affected coastline in October 1987. These researchers
(30) believe the toxin accumulated in the tissue of fish and
then was ingested by dolphins that preyed on them.
The emaciated appearance of many dolphins indicated
that they were metabolizing their blubber reserves,
thereby reducing their buoyancy and insulation (and
(35) adding to overall stress) as well as releasing stores of
previously accumulated synthetic pollutants, such as
PCBs, which further exacerbated their condition. The
combined impact made the dolphins vulnerable to
opportunistic bacterial infection, the ultimate cause of
(40) death.
For several reasons, however, this explanation is
not entirely plausible. First, bottlenose dolphins and
P. brevis red tides are both common in the Gulf of
Mexico, yet no dolphin die-off of a similar magnitude
(45) has been noted there. Second, dolphins began dying
in June, hundreds of miles north of and some months
earlier than the October red tide bloom. Finally, the
specific effects of brevetoxin on dolphins are unknown,
whereas PCB poisoning is known to impair functioning
(50) of the immune system and liver and to cause skin
lesions; all of these problems were observed in the
diseased animals. An alternative hypothesis, which
accounts for these facts, is that a sudden influx of
pollutants, perhaps from offshore dumping, triggered a
(55) cascade of disorders in animals whose systems were
already heavily laden with pollutants. Although
brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor, the
event that actually precipitated the die-off was a sharp
increase in the dolphins’ exposure to synthetic
(60) pollutants.
least 740 bottlenose dolphins out of a total coastal
population of 3,000 to 5,000 washed ashore on the
Atlantic coast of the United States. Since some of the
(5) dead animals never washed ashore, the overall disaster
was presumably worse; perhaps 50 percent of the
population died. A dolphin die-off of this character and
magnitude had never before been observed;
furthermore, the dolphins exhibited a startling range of
(10) symptoms. The research team that examined the die-
off noted the presence of both skin lesions and internal
lesions in the liver, lung, pancreas, and heart, which
suggested a massive opportunistic bacterial infection of
already weakened animals.
(15) Tissues from the stricken dolphins were analyzed
for a variety of toxins. Brevetoxin, a toxin produced by
the blooming of the alga Ptychodiscus brevis, was
present in eight out of seventeen dolphins tested. Tests
for synthetic pollutants revealed that polychlorinated
(20) biphenyls (PCBs) were present in almost all animals
tested.
The research team concluded that brevetoxin
poisoning was the most likely cause of the illnesses
that killed the dolphins. Although P. brevis is
(25) ordinarily not found along the Atlantic coast, an
unusual bloom of this organism—such blooms are
called “red tides” because of the reddish color imparted
by the blooming algae—did occur in the middle of the
affected coastline in October 1987. These researchers
(30) believe the toxin accumulated in the tissue of fish and
then was ingested by dolphins that preyed on them.
The emaciated appearance of many dolphins indicated
that they were metabolizing their blubber reserves,
thereby reducing their buoyancy and insulation (and
(35) adding to overall stress) as well as releasing stores of
previously accumulated synthetic pollutants, such as
PCBs, which further exacerbated their condition. The
combined impact made the dolphins vulnerable to
opportunistic bacterial infection, the ultimate cause of
(40) death.
For several reasons, however, this explanation is
not entirely plausible. First, bottlenose dolphins and
P. brevis red tides are both common in the Gulf of
Mexico, yet no dolphin die-off of a similar magnitude
(45) has been noted there. Second, dolphins began dying
in June, hundreds of miles north of and some months
earlier than the October red tide bloom. Finally, the
specific effects of brevetoxin on dolphins are unknown,
whereas PCB poisoning is known to impair functioning
(50) of the immune system and liver and to cause skin
lesions; all of these problems were observed in the
diseased animals. An alternative hypothesis, which
accounts for these facts, is that a sudden influx of
pollutants, perhaps from offshore dumping, triggered a
(55) cascade of disorders in animals whose systems were
already heavily laden with pollutants. Although
brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor, the
event that actually precipitated the die-off was a sharp
increase in the dolphins’ exposure to synthetic
(60) pollutants.
1. The passage is primarily concerned with assessing
(A) the effects of a devastating bacterial infection in Atlantic coast bottlenose dolphins
(B) the process by which illnesses in Atlantic coast bottlenose dolphins were correctly diagnosed
(C) the weaknesses in the research methodology used to explore the dolphin die-off
(D) possible alternative explanations for the massive dolphin die-off
(E) relative effects of various marine pollutants on dolphin mortality
(A) the effects of a devastating bacterial infection in Atlantic coast bottlenose dolphins
(B) the process by which illnesses in Atlantic coast bottlenose dolphins were correctly diagnosed
(C) the weaknesses in the research methodology used to explore the dolphin die-off
(D) possible alternative explanations for the massive dolphin die-off
(E) relative effects of various marine pollutants on dolphin mortality
2. Which one of the following is mentioned in the passage as evidence for the explanation of the dolphin die-off offered in the final paragraph?
(A) the release of stored brevetoxins from the dolphins’ blubber reserves
(B) the date on which offshore dumping was known to have occurred nearby
(C) the presence of dumping sites for PCBs in the area
(D) the synthetic pollutants that were present in the fish eaten by the dolphins
(E) the effects of PCBs on liver function in dolphins
(A) the release of stored brevetoxins from the dolphins’ blubber reserves
(B) the date on which offshore dumping was known to have occurred nearby
(C) the presence of dumping sites for PCBs in the area
(D) the synthetic pollutants that were present in the fish eaten by the dolphins
(E) the effects of PCBs on liver function in dolphins
3. Which one of the following is most analogous to the approach taken by the author of the passage with regard to the research described in the third paragraph?
(A) A physics teacher accepts the data from a student’s experiment but questions the student’s conclusions.
(B) An astronomer provides additional observations to support another astronomer’s theory.
(C) A cook revises a traditional recipe by substituting modern ingredients for those used in the original.
(D) A doctor prescribes medication for a patient whose illness was misdiagnosed by another doctor.
(E) A microbiologist sets out to replicate the experiment that yielded a classic theory of cell structure.
(A) A physics teacher accepts the data from a student’s experiment but questions the student’s conclusions.
(B) An astronomer provides additional observations to support another astronomer’s theory.
(C) A cook revises a traditional recipe by substituting modern ingredients for those used in the original.
(D) A doctor prescribes medication for a patient whose illness was misdiagnosed by another doctor.
(E) A microbiologist sets out to replicate the experiment that yielded a classic theory of cell structure.
4. Which one of the following most accurately describes the organization of the last paragraph?
(A) One explanation is criticized and a different explanation is proposed.
(B) An argument is advanced and then refuted by means of an opposing argument.
(C) Objections against a hypothesis are advanced, the hypothesis is explained more fully, and then the objections are rejected.
(D) New evidence in favor of a theory is described, and then the theory is reaffirmed.
(E) Discrepancies between two explanations are noted, and a third explanation is proposed.
(A) One explanation is criticized and a different explanation is proposed.
(B) An argument is advanced and then refuted by means of an opposing argument.
(C) Objections against a hypothesis are advanced, the hypothesis is explained more fully, and then the objections are rejected.
(D) New evidence in favor of a theory is described, and then the theory is reaffirmed.
(E) Discrepancies between two explanations are noted, and a third explanation is proposed.
5. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would most probably agree with which one of the following statements about brevetoxin?
(A) It may have been responsible for the dolphins’ skin lesions but could not have contributed to the bacterial infection.
(B) It forms more easily when both P. brevis and synthetic pollutants are present in the environment simultaneously.
(C) It damages liver function and immune system responses in bottlenose dolphins but may not have triggered this particular dolphin die-off.
(D) It is unlikely to be among the factors that contributed to the dolphin die-off.
(E) It is unlikely to have caused the die-off because it was not present in the dolphins’ environment when the die-off began.
(A) It may have been responsible for the dolphins’ skin lesions but could not have contributed to the bacterial infection.
(B) It forms more easily when both P. brevis and synthetic pollutants are present in the environment simultaneously.
(C) It damages liver function and immune system responses in bottlenose dolphins but may not have triggered this particular dolphin die-off.
(D) It is unlikely to be among the factors that contributed to the dolphin die-off.
(E) It is unlikely to have caused the die-off because it was not present in the dolphins’ environment when the die-off began.
6. The explanation for the dolphin die-off given by the research team most strongly supports which one of the following?
(A) The biological mechanism by which brevetoxin affects dolphins is probably different from that by which it affects other marine animals.
(B) When P. brevis blooms in an area where it does not usually exist, it is more toxic than it is in its usual habitat.
(C) Opportunistic bacterial infection is usually associated with brevetoxin poisoning in bottlenose dolphins.
(D) The dolphins’ emaciated state was probably a symptom of PCB poisoning rather than of brevetoxin poisoning rather than of brevetoxin poisoning.
(E) When a dolphin metabolizes its blubber, the PCBs released may be more dangerous to the dolphin than they were when stored in the blubber.
(A) The biological mechanism by which brevetoxin affects dolphins is probably different from that by which it affects other marine animals.
(B) When P. brevis blooms in an area where it does not usually exist, it is more toxic than it is in its usual habitat.
(C) Opportunistic bacterial infection is usually associated with brevetoxin poisoning in bottlenose dolphins.
(D) The dolphins’ emaciated state was probably a symptom of PCB poisoning rather than of brevetoxin poisoning rather than of brevetoxin poisoning.
(E) When a dolphin metabolizes its blubber, the PCBs released may be more dangerous to the dolphin than they were when stored in the blubber.
7. The author refers to dolphins in the Gulf of Mexico in the last paragraph in order to
(A) refute the assertion that dolphins tend not to inhabit areas where P. brevis is common
(B) compare the effects of synthetic pollutants on these dolphins and on Atlantic coast dolphins
(C) cast doubt on the belief that P. brevis contributes substantially to dolphin die-offs
(D) illustrate the fact that dolphins in relatively pollution-free waters are healthier than dolphins in polluted waters.
(E) provide evidence for the argument that P. brevis was probably responsible for the dolphins’ deaths
(A) refute the assertion that dolphins tend not to inhabit areas where P. brevis is common
(B) compare the effects of synthetic pollutants on these dolphins and on Atlantic coast dolphins
(C) cast doubt on the belief that P. brevis contributes substantially to dolphin die-offs
(D) illustrate the fact that dolphins in relatively pollution-free waters are healthier than dolphins in polluted waters.
(E) provide evidence for the argument that P. brevis was probably responsible for the dolphins’ deaths
8. Which one of the following factors is explicitly cited as contributing to the dolphins’ deaths in both theories discussed in the passage?
(A) the dolphins diet
(B) the presence of P. brevis in the Gulf of Mexico
(C) the wide variety of toxins released by the red tide bloom of October 1987
(D) the presence of synthetic pollutants in the dolphins’ bodies
(E) the bacterial infection caused by a generalized failure of the dolphins’ immune systems
(A) the dolphins diet
(B) the presence of P. brevis in the Gulf of Mexico
(C) the wide variety of toxins released by the red tide bloom of October 1987
(D) the presence of synthetic pollutants in the dolphins’ bodies
(E) the bacterial infection caused by a generalized failure of the dolphins’ immune systems
KeyurJoshi
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 143
19 Nov 2020, 00:36
Kudos
Bookmarks
1. The passage is primarily concerned with assessing
(A) the effects of a devastating bacterial infection in Atlantic coast bottlenose dolphins - too specific discussed only in 3rd para
(B) the process by which illnesses in Atlantic coast bottlenose dolphins were correctly diagnosed - incorrect and too specific. The first diagnosis process was a hypothesis.
(C) the weaknesses in the research methodology used to explore the dolphin die-off - tempting but too specific. Discussed only in the last paragraph.
(D) possible alternative explanations for the massive dolphin die-off - Correct. 1st and 2nd para introduces the die-offs and one possible explanation. 3rd para elaborates this explanation and 4th para proposes an alternative explanation.
(E) relative effects of various marine pollutants on dolphin mortality - too specific.
2. Which one of the following is mentioned in the passage as evidence for the explanation of the dolphin die-off offered in the final paragraph?
(A) the release of stored brevetoxins from the dolphins’ blubber reserves - blubber reserves are discussed in 3rd para
(B) the date on which offshore dumping was known to have occurred nearby - date is not discussed.
(C) the presence of dumping sites for PCBs in the area - not discussed
(D) the synthetic pollutants that were present in the fish eaten by the dolphins - Discussed in 3rd para
(E) the effects of PCBs on liver function in dolphins - Correct
Inference -
"PCB poisoning is known to impair functioning
of the immune system and liver and to cause skin
lesions; all of these problems were observed in the
diseased animals.
3. Which one of the following is most analogous to the approach taken by the author of the passage with regard to the research described in the third paragraph?
Here's what I think to infer :
Researchers - "The combined impact made the dolphins vulnerable to opportunistic bacterial infection, the ultimate cause of death."
Author - "For several reasons, however, this explanation is not entirely plausible. "
Author - "Although brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor, the event that actually precipitated the die-off was a sharp increase in the dolphins’ exposure to synthetic pollutants"
(A) A physics teacher accepts the data from a student’s experiment but questions the student’s conclusions. - Correct. Inline with the statements made above. Think of Author as Teacher and Researchers as Students.
(B) An astronomer provides additional observations to support another astronomer’s theory. - NO theories/hypothesis are supported in the passage with additional premise.
(C) A cook revises a traditional recipe by substituting modern ingredients for those used in the original. - If we consider cook as author here, then the author actually provides an alternative and not a revision of original hypothesis.
(D) A doctor prescribes medication for a patient whose illness was misdiagnosed by another doctor. - If we consider a doctor as an author then we have to consider another doctor as another author whereas comparisons are between explanations of author and researchers.
(E) A microbiologist sets out to replicate the experiment that yielded a classic theory of cell structure. - Irrelevant. Neither author nor researchers replicate anything
4. Which one of the following most accurately describes the organization of the last paragraph?
(A) One explanation is criticized and a different explanation is proposed. - Correct. Author criticizes the researchers explanation as "not entirely plausible" and proposes different explanation of "increase in pollutants"
(B) An argument is advanced and then refuted by means of an opposing argument. - Researcher's explanation is neither advanced nor refuted directly.
(C) Objections against a hypothesis are advanced, the hypothesis is explained more fully, and then the objections are rejected. - Absolutely not. Even if it seems as an objection from author, that objection at the end is supported by an alternative explanation and NOT rejected.
(D) New evidence in favor of a theory is described, and then the theory is reaffirmed. - Opposite. No new evidence in favor of researchers.
(E) Discrepancies between two explanations are noted, and a third explanation is proposed. - There are only two explanations in the passage and NOT three.
5. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would most probably agree with which one of the following statements about brevetoxin?
(A) It may have been responsible for the dolphins’ skin lesions but could not have contributed to the bacterial infection. - PCB is known to cause skin lesions. According to author "Although brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor, ..."
(B) It forms more easily when both P. brevis and synthetic pollutants are present in the environment simultaneously. - Incorrect. Easy formation is not discussed.
(C) It damages liver function and immune system responses in bottlenose dolphins but may not have triggered this particular dolphin die-off. - Incorrect. Same as A, PCB is know to cause these disorders and according to author "Although brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor, ..."
(D) It is unlikely to be among the factors that contributed to the dolphin die-off. - Again incorrect. According to author "Although brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor, ..."
(E) It is unlikely to have caused the die-off because it was not present in the dolphins’ environment when the die-off began. - Correct
Inference - " Although brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor, the event that actually precipitated the die-off was a sharp increase in the dolphins’ exposure to synthetic pollutants."
6. The explanation for the dolphin die-off given by the research team most strongly supports which one of the following?
(A) The biological mechanism by which brevetoxin affects dolphins is probably different from that by which it affects other marine animals. - difference in effects on other marine animals are not discussed.
(B) When P. brevis blooms in an area where it does not usually exist, it is more toxic than it is in its usual habitat. - Not true. It is toxic where it blooms. It was equally toxic along atlantic coast as it was in its usual habitat.
(C) Opportunistic bacterial infection is usually associated with brevetoxin poisoning in bottlenose dolphins. - Opportunistic bacterial infection is associated with both Brevetoxin and PCB combined.
(D) The dolphins’ emaciated state was probably a symptom of PCB poisoning rather than of brevetoxin poisoning - It was, according to researchers, both combined.
(E) When a dolphin metabolizes its blubber, the PCBs released may be more dangerous to the dolphin than they were when stored in the blubber. - Correct.
Inference - "dolphins indicated
that they were metabolizing their blubber reserves, thereby reducing their buoyancy and insulation (and adding to overall stress) as well as releasing stores of previously accumulated synthetic pollutants, such as PCBs, which further exacerbated their condition."
7. The author refers to dolphins in the Gulf of Mexico in the last paragraph in order to
Inference - "bottlenose dolphins and P. brevis red tides are both common in the Gulf of Mexico, yet no dolphin die-off of a similar magnitude has been noted there."
(A) refute the assertion that dolphins tend not to inhabit areas where P. brevis is common - Not true. They can co-exist.
(B) compare the effects of synthetic pollutants on these dolphins and on Atlantic coast dolphins - Synthetic pollutants are not considered.
(C) cast doubt on the belief that P. brevis contributes substantially to dolphin die-offs - Correct. Inline with inference.
(D) illustrate the fact that dolphins in relatively pollution-free waters are healthier than dolphins in polluted waters. - Out of scope.
(E) provide evidence for the argument that P. brevis was probably responsible for the dolphins’ deaths - Opposite. Evidence to refute that P. brevis may was the cause of die-offs.
8. Which one of the following factors is explicitly cited as contributing to the dolphins’ deaths in both theories discussed in the passage?
Researchers - "Tests for synthetic pollutants revealed that polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were present in almost all animals tested.
Author - "Although brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor, the event that actually precipitated the die-off was a sharp increase in the dolphins’ exposure to synthetic pollutants."
(A) the dolphins diet - Only discussed by researchers
(B) the presence of P. brevis in the Gulf of Mexico - Only discussed by author.
(C) the wide variety of toxins released by the red tide bloom of October 1987 - Brevetoxin may have contributed and NOT a variety of toxins
(D) the presence of synthetic pollutants in the dolphins’ bodies - Correct. Inline with inference.
(E) the bacterial infection caused by a generalized failure of the dolphins’ immune systems - Only discussed by researchers
(A) the effects of a devastating bacterial infection in Atlantic coast bottlenose dolphins - too specific discussed only in 3rd para
(B) the process by which illnesses in Atlantic coast bottlenose dolphins were correctly diagnosed - incorrect and too specific. The first diagnosis process was a hypothesis.
(C) the weaknesses in the research methodology used to explore the dolphin die-off - tempting but too specific. Discussed only in the last paragraph.
(D) possible alternative explanations for the massive dolphin die-off - Correct. 1st and 2nd para introduces the die-offs and one possible explanation. 3rd para elaborates this explanation and 4th para proposes an alternative explanation.
(E) relative effects of various marine pollutants on dolphin mortality - too specific.
2. Which one of the following is mentioned in the passage as evidence for the explanation of the dolphin die-off offered in the final paragraph?
(A) the release of stored brevetoxins from the dolphins’ blubber reserves - blubber reserves are discussed in 3rd para
(B) the date on which offshore dumping was known to have occurred nearby - date is not discussed.
(C) the presence of dumping sites for PCBs in the area - not discussed
(D) the synthetic pollutants that were present in the fish eaten by the dolphins - Discussed in 3rd para
(E) the effects of PCBs on liver function in dolphins - Correct
Inference -
"PCB poisoning is known to impair functioning
of the immune system and liver and to cause skin
lesions; all of these problems were observed in the
diseased animals.
3. Which one of the following is most analogous to the approach taken by the author of the passage with regard to the research described in the third paragraph?
Here's what I think to infer :
Researchers - "The combined impact made the dolphins vulnerable to opportunistic bacterial infection, the ultimate cause of death."
Author - "For several reasons, however, this explanation is not entirely plausible. "
Author - "Although brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor, the event that actually precipitated the die-off was a sharp increase in the dolphins’ exposure to synthetic pollutants"
(A) A physics teacher accepts the data from a student’s experiment but questions the student’s conclusions. - Correct. Inline with the statements made above. Think of Author as Teacher and Researchers as Students.
(B) An astronomer provides additional observations to support another astronomer’s theory. - NO theories/hypothesis are supported in the passage with additional premise.
(C) A cook revises a traditional recipe by substituting modern ingredients for those used in the original. - If we consider cook as author here, then the author actually provides an alternative and not a revision of original hypothesis.
(D) A doctor prescribes medication for a patient whose illness was misdiagnosed by another doctor. - If we consider a doctor as an author then we have to consider another doctor as another author whereas comparisons are between explanations of author and researchers.
(E) A microbiologist sets out to replicate the experiment that yielded a classic theory of cell structure. - Irrelevant. Neither author nor researchers replicate anything
4. Which one of the following most accurately describes the organization of the last paragraph?
(A) One explanation is criticized and a different explanation is proposed. - Correct. Author criticizes the researchers explanation as "not entirely plausible" and proposes different explanation of "increase in pollutants"
(B) An argument is advanced and then refuted by means of an opposing argument. - Researcher's explanation is neither advanced nor refuted directly.
(C) Objections against a hypothesis are advanced, the hypothesis is explained more fully, and then the objections are rejected. - Absolutely not. Even if it seems as an objection from author, that objection at the end is supported by an alternative explanation and NOT rejected.
(D) New evidence in favor of a theory is described, and then the theory is reaffirmed. - Opposite. No new evidence in favor of researchers.
(E) Discrepancies between two explanations are noted, and a third explanation is proposed. - There are only two explanations in the passage and NOT three.
5. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would most probably agree with which one of the following statements about brevetoxin?
(A) It may have been responsible for the dolphins’ skin lesions but could not have contributed to the bacterial infection. - PCB is known to cause skin lesions. According to author "Although brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor, ..."
(B) It forms more easily when both P. brevis and synthetic pollutants are present in the environment simultaneously. - Incorrect. Easy formation is not discussed.
(C) It damages liver function and immune system responses in bottlenose dolphins but may not have triggered this particular dolphin die-off. - Incorrect. Same as A, PCB is know to cause these disorders and according to author "Although brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor, ..."
(D) It is unlikely to be among the factors that contributed to the dolphin die-off. - Again incorrect. According to author "Although brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor, ..."
(E) It is unlikely to have caused the die-off because it was not present in the dolphins’ environment when the die-off began. - Correct
Inference - " Although brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor, the event that actually precipitated the die-off was a sharp increase in the dolphins’ exposure to synthetic pollutants."
6. The explanation for the dolphin die-off given by the research team most strongly supports which one of the following?
(A) The biological mechanism by which brevetoxin affects dolphins is probably different from that by which it affects other marine animals. - difference in effects on other marine animals are not discussed.
(B) When P. brevis blooms in an area where it does not usually exist, it is more toxic than it is in its usual habitat. - Not true. It is toxic where it blooms. It was equally toxic along atlantic coast as it was in its usual habitat.
(C) Opportunistic bacterial infection is usually associated with brevetoxin poisoning in bottlenose dolphins. - Opportunistic bacterial infection is associated with both Brevetoxin and PCB combined.
(D) The dolphins’ emaciated state was probably a symptom of PCB poisoning rather than of brevetoxin poisoning - It was, according to researchers, both combined.
(E) When a dolphin metabolizes its blubber, the PCBs released may be more dangerous to the dolphin than they were when stored in the blubber. - Correct.
Inference - "dolphins indicated
that they were metabolizing their blubber reserves, thereby reducing their buoyancy and insulation (and adding to overall stress) as well as releasing stores of previously accumulated synthetic pollutants, such as PCBs, which further exacerbated their condition."
7. The author refers to dolphins in the Gulf of Mexico in the last paragraph in order to
Inference - "bottlenose dolphins and P. brevis red tides are both common in the Gulf of Mexico, yet no dolphin die-off of a similar magnitude has been noted there."
(A) refute the assertion that dolphins tend not to inhabit areas where P. brevis is common - Not true. They can co-exist.
(B) compare the effects of synthetic pollutants on these dolphins and on Atlantic coast dolphins - Synthetic pollutants are not considered.
(C) cast doubt on the belief that P. brevis contributes substantially to dolphin die-offs - Correct. Inline with inference.
(D) illustrate the fact that dolphins in relatively pollution-free waters are healthier than dolphins in polluted waters. - Out of scope.
(E) provide evidence for the argument that P. brevis was probably responsible for the dolphins’ deaths - Opposite. Evidence to refute that P. brevis may was the cause of die-offs.
8. Which one of the following factors is explicitly cited as contributing to the dolphins’ deaths in both theories discussed in the passage?
Researchers - "Tests for synthetic pollutants revealed that polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were present in almost all animals tested.
Author - "Although brevetoxin may have been a contributing factor, the event that actually precipitated the die-off was a sharp increase in the dolphins’ exposure to synthetic pollutants."
(A) the dolphins diet - Only discussed by researchers
(B) the presence of P. brevis in the Gulf of Mexico - Only discussed by author.
(C) the wide variety of toxins released by the red tide bloom of October 1987 - Brevetoxin may have contributed and NOT a variety of toxins
(D) the presence of synthetic pollutants in the dolphins’ bodies - Correct. Inline with inference.
(E) the bacterial infection caused by a generalized failure of the dolphins’ immune systems - Only discussed by researchers
General Discussion
18 Feb 2021, 11:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
Explanation
3. Which one of the following is most analogous to the approach taken by the author of the passage with regard to the research described in the third paragraph?
Explanation
In Paragraph 3 the author relates the evidence that the research team found for its brevetoxin hypothesis, but it’s not until Paragraph 4 that he reveals his point of view on the team’s reasoning, which is of course that their rather sound evidence does not lead to their conclusion; rather, it supports a very different hypothesis from the one the team came up with. This is almost exactly repeated in (A).
(B) Unlike the astronomer in (B), the author seeks to undercut someone else’s theory, by coming up with a better one of his own.
(C) The passage features no revision of evidence that would be necessary for (C) to be an appropriate analogy.
(D)’s emphasis on action—the doctor prescribing medication—has no parallel in the passage. (D) would be a better choice if it read, “A doctor makes a correct diagnosis using a patient’s chart from which a colleague made an earlier misdiagnosis.”
(E) totally loses sight of the author’s disagreement with the conclusion that the team drew from the evidence compiled in Paragraph 3.
Answer: A
Explanation
In Paragraph 3 the author relates the evidence that the research team found for its brevetoxin hypothesis, but it’s not until Paragraph 4 that he reveals his point of view on the team’s reasoning, which is of course that their rather sound evidence does not lead to their conclusion; rather, it supports a very different hypothesis from the one the team came up with. This is almost exactly repeated in (A).
(B) Unlike the astronomer in (B), the author seeks to undercut someone else’s theory, by coming up with a better one of his own.
(C) The passage features no revision of evidence that would be necessary for (C) to be an appropriate analogy.
(D)’s emphasis on action—the doctor prescribing medication—has no parallel in the passage. (D) would be a better choice if it read, “A doctor makes a correct diagnosis using a patient’s chart from which a colleague made an earlier misdiagnosis.”
(E) totally loses sight of the author’s disagreement with the conclusion that the team drew from the evidence compiled in Paragraph 3.
Answer: A
Explanation Credit: Kaplan LSAT
