Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 05:20 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 05:20
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,836
Own Kudos:
51,901
 [28]
Given Kudos: 6,334
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,836
Kudos: 51,901
 [28]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
24
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
100mitra
Joined: 29 Apr 2019
Last visit: 06 Jul 2022
Posts: 707
Own Kudos:
634
 [3]
Given Kudos: 49
Status:Learning
Posts: 707
Kudos: 634
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mainbhiankit
User avatar
Fuqua Moderator
Joined: 21 Jul 2021
Last visit: 20 Oct 2023
Posts: 231
Own Kudos:
176
 [2]
Given Kudos: 56
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Posts: 231
Kudos: 176
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Ggt1234
Joined: 26 Apr 2024
Last visit: 10 Apr 2026
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 102
Posts: 24
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Great question. But don't think the correct answer to Q2 should mention tax cuts for the rich instead of just tax cuts? The passage mentions only wealth redistribution and excess of industry, which could imply tax cut for the poor, tax hike for the rich or both. Whereas the author only talks about striking a balance between affluence and poverty, hence econnomic life can indeed be a bipolar phenomenon. Am I missing something?
User avatar
Matty101
Joined: 19 Sep 2024
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 767
Posts: 34
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ggt1234
Great question. But don't think the correct answer to Q2 should mention tax cuts for the rich instead of just tax cuts? The passage mentions only wealth redistribution and excess of industry, which could imply tax cut for the poor, tax hike for the rich or both. Whereas the author only talks about striking a balance between affluence and poverty, hence econnomic life can indeed be a bipolar phenomenon. Am I missing something?

Hello.

In the passage it mentions: "the lack of state intervention to preserve the environment against the excesses of industry. " He later mentions " most controversially, the redistribution of wealth through taxation." Most commonly, the redistribution of wealth has to do with taxing of the wealthier class. It is okay if you do not want to make this assumption, but throughout the passage, he talks about wanting more balance in wealth.

Earlier on he makes these points:

"better balance in advanced capitalist societies between private affluence and the evident public poverty." This suggests that perhaps some wealth should taken from more affluent individuals and given to "impoverished disenfranchised citizens."

In general, it seems as if the wealthy have more than enough, and this leads into his later point that taxation would be beneficial. So out of the options given, it is likely the group with more than they need, do not need additional tax cuts.

Even if it isn't a great choice, it seems better than any of the other choices we are given.
User avatar
rak08
Joined: 01 Feb 2025
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 268
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 405
Location: India
GPA: 7.14
Posts: 268
Kudos: 28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@KarshimaB GMATNinja egmat

Please assist with Q3,
how do we know 1970s ref,
how can we know the criticism was written during the period of monetarism and not after this fall?

Sajjad1994
The author of The Affluent Society argued throughout his long and distinguished career for a better balance in advanced capitalist societies between private affluence and the evident public poverty. By public poverty he meant the impoverished disenfranchised citizens, but also the poor infrastructure such as inadequate roads, state school provision and the lack of state intervention to preserve the environment against the excesses of industry. The affluent society was to be achieved through measures (more active government, welfare programs, state planning and most controversially, the redistribution of wealth through taxation), which were very much out of favor during the brief period when monetarism dominated both politics and economics. Of course, Galbraith had been making the case for these policies long before monetarism and he continued to do so long after its demise; a demise that he most certainly hastened with his profound yet witty criticism of that ideology. For a European it is hard to understand why he did not embrace socialism, but he always advocated the mixed economy. Politically and as an adopted American he was a Democrat. Intellectually he was a lifelong disciple of Keynes and greatly influenced by the post-war American New Deal.

1. Which of the following statements best expresses the primary objective of the passage?

A. to expound Keynesian economics
B. to highlight the period of monetarism as brief and controversial
C. to put forward the theories of Galbraith
D. to set forth the case for greater state intervention and curtail the excesses of capitalism
E. to present the theories found in the classic title The Affluent Society


2. Which of the following statements can best be inferred from the passage?

A. Mr Galbraith was acclaimed for the way he made complex economic theory accessible to the person in the street.
B. Tax cuts should be opposed if the air is polluted.
C. The perfect society would be one where the rich accepted high rates of taxation.
D. Economic life is a bipolar phenomenon.
E. The benefits of tax cuts trickle down through the whole of society.


3. Which of the following statements, if true, would add most to the main point of the passage?

A. Galbraith was disappointed with the collapse of communism.
B. Most people are content to accept public squalor and private affluence.
C. Galbraith met J.M. Keynes.
D. It is claimed that his fame was fading in the 1970s until he wrote his critique of the monetarist, Milton Freedman.
E. Galbraith was delighted by the collapse of communism.


RC Butler 2022 - Practice Two RC Passages Everyday.
Passage # 33 Date: 21-Jan-2022
This question is a part of RC Butler 2022. Click here for Details

Source: How to pass the GMAT
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 5,632
Own Kudos:
33,433
 [1]
Given Kudos: 707
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,632
Kudos: 33,433
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Think of it this way:

If someone says "The firefighter hastened the end of the fire with her quick action" , can the quick action have happened AFTER the fire was already out? Obviously not. You can only speed up the end of something that's still happening.

Same logic here. The passage says Galbraith "hastened the demise" of monetarism with his criticism. That single word - hastened - locks the criticism into the period WHEN monetarism was still alive and dominant. The criticism came during monetarism, not after.

Answer D adds concrete evidence to this: his fame was fading in the 1970s (when monetarism was rising), and his critique of Milton Friedman revived it. This perfectly supports the passage's claim that his criticism was powerful enough to help bring monetarism down.

You don't need to independently "know" the 1970s - the question says "if true." You just need to check: does this ADD to the main point? D directly strengthens the passage's central claim about Galbraith as an effective critic of monetarism.

rak08
@KarshimaB GMATNinja egmat

Please assist with Q3,
how do we know 1970s ref,
how can we know the criticism was written during the period of monetarism and not after this fall?


User avatar
Shubham2599jain
Joined: 07 Dec 2024
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q83 V74 DI74
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q83 V74 DI74
Posts: 15
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel KarishmaB Please explain the third question. The answer seems too out of the way
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,013
Own Kudos:
11,321
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,013
Kudos: 11,321
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
The author of The Affluent Society argued throughout his long and distinguished career for a better balance in advanced capitalist societies between private affluence and the evident public poverty. By public poverty he meant the impoverished disenfranchised citizens, but also the poor infrastructure such as inadequate roads, state school provision and the lack of state intervention to preserve the environment against the excesses of industry. The affluent society was to be achieved through measures (more active government, welfare programs, state planning and most controversially, the redistribution of wealth through taxation), which were very much out of favor during the brief period when monetarism dominated both politics and economics. Of course, Galbraith had been making the case for these policies long before monetarism and he continued to do so long after its demise; a demise that he most certainly hastened with his profound yet witty criticism of that ideology. For a European it is hard to understand why he did not embrace socialism, but he always advocated the mixed economy. Politically and as an adopted American he was a Democrat. Intellectually he was a lifelong disciple of Keynes and greatly influenced by the post-war American New Deal.

3. Which of the following statements, if true, would add most to the main point of the passage?

The passage’s main point is that Galbraith consistently argued for a mixed economy with stronger public investment and redistribution to reduce “public poverty,” and that he opposed monetarism with influential criticism while remaining Keynesian and politically aligned with the Democrats and the New Deal.

A. Galbraith was disappointed with the collapse of communism.

Communism is not the focus of the passage, and this does not add to the main point about his views on capitalism, public poverty, and the mixed economy.

B. Most people are content to accept public squalor and private affluence.

This reinforces the problem Galbraith criticized, but it does not add much about Galbraith’s specific argument, policies, or impact, which are what the passage mainly develops.

C. Galbraith met J.M. Keynes.

This is a minor biographical detail. The passage already establishes he was intellectually Keynesian, so this adds little.

D. It is claimed that his fame was fading in the 1970s until he wrote his critique of the monetarist, Milton Freedman.

This directly adds to a major strand of the passage: that Galbraith delivered influential criticism of monetarism and helped hasten its demise. It strengthens the passage’s portrayal of his impact as a critic of monetarism.

E. Galbraith was delighted by the collapse of communism.

Same issue as (A): not tied to the passage’s main point.

Answer: (D)
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts