Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 22:22 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 22:22
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,293
 [22]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,293
 [22]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
18
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Nishuchoudhary12
Joined: 24 Oct 2021
Last visit: 26 Mar 2022
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 7
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
100mitra
Joined: 29 Apr 2019
Last visit: 06 Jul 2022
Posts: 714
Own Kudos:
629
 [3]
Given Kudos: 49
Status:Learning
Posts: 714
Kudos: 629
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mainbhiankit
User avatar
Fuqua Moderator
Joined: 21 Jul 2021
Last visit: 20 Oct 2023
Posts: 232
Own Kudos:
176
 [2]
Given Kudos: 56
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Posts: 232
Kudos: 176
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Wow, this one's pretty difficult.

In Question 1, I was stuck between options C and E. While I understand why option C can be the answer, I can't really eliminate option E. Can someone help with that?

For Question 2, I have no clue why option C is right and why option E is incorrect. One of the policies for achieving an affluent society is income redistribution using taxation, right? So, can't option E be inferred from this?

Lastly, I did get Question 3 correct, so I will mention the logic that I used for it. Maybe it might help someone.

Quote:
3. Which of the following statements, if true, would add most to the main point of the passage?

A. Galbraith was disappointed with the collapse of communism.
B. Most people are content to accept public squalor and private affluence.
C. Galbraith met J.M. Keynes.
D. It is claimed that his fame was fading in the 1970s until he wrote his critique of the monetarist, Milton Freedman.
E. Galbraith was delighted by the collapse of communism.

Excerpt from the passage:
Quote:
Of course, Galbraith had been making the case for these policies long before monetarism and he continued to do so long after its demise; a demise that he most certainly hastened with his profound yet witty criticism of that ideology.

This tells us that even though he supported monetarism, the demise of the ideology was related to his criticism of the same. Think of this as a 'resolve the paradox' CR question. Why did he do this? Option D sort of gives his reasoning to do so, thereby adding further information. Hence, D is the correct answer.
User avatar
Ggt1234
Joined: 26 Apr 2024
Last visit: 13 Nov 2025
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 102
Posts: 21
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Great question. But don't think the correct answer to Q2 should mention tax cuts for the rich instead of just tax cuts? The passage mentions only wealth redistribution and excess of industry, which could imply tax cut for the poor, tax hike for the rich or both. Whereas the author only talks about striking a balance between affluence and poverty, hence econnomic life can indeed be a bipolar phenomenon. Am I missing something?
User avatar
Matty101
Joined: 19 Sep 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 681
Posts: 35
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ggt1234
Great question. But don't think the correct answer to Q2 should mention tax cuts for the rich instead of just tax cuts? The passage mentions only wealth redistribution and excess of industry, which could imply tax cut for the poor, tax hike for the rich or both. Whereas the author only talks about striking a balance between affluence and poverty, hence econnomic life can indeed be a bipolar phenomenon. Am I missing something?

Hello.

In the passage it mentions: "the lack of state intervention to preserve the environment against the excesses of industry. " He later mentions " most controversially, the redistribution of wealth through taxation." Most commonly, the redistribution of wealth has to do with taxing of the wealthier class. It is okay if you do not want to make this assumption, but throughout the passage, he talks about wanting more balance in wealth.

Earlier on he makes these points:

"better balance in advanced capitalist societies between private affluence and the evident public poverty." This suggests that perhaps some wealth should taken from more affluent individuals and given to "impoverished disenfranchised citizens."

In general, it seems as if the wealthy have more than enough, and this leads into his later point that taxation would be beneficial. So out of the options given, it is likely the group with more than they need, do not need additional tax cuts.

Even if it isn't a great choice, it seems better than any of the other choices we are given.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17289 posts
188 posts