Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 0808:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
May 0701:00 AM EDT
-02:00 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and.....
May 0808:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
May 0912:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
30 Jun 2023, 07:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
Question 1
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
55% (02:29) correct
45%
(02:12) wrong
based on 139
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 2
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
76% (00:58) correct 24%
(01:02) wrong
based on 118
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 3
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
5%
(low)
Question Stats:
91% (00:41) correct 9%
(01:02) wrong
based on 128
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 4
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
55%
(hard)
Question Stats:
31% (00:34) correct 69%
(00:34) wrong
based on 121
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 5
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
64% (00:39) correct 36%
(00:39) wrong
based on 121
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer made waves once more when she banned her employees from telecommuting and gave them an ultimatum: Work at the office or quit. From one of the few women in a leadership position in an industry where flexibility in the workplace has been common if not required, this was a radical move.
Protesters flocked to point out that Mayer, herself a new mother, had installed at her own expense a nursery next door to her office, something no other working parent could possibly afford to do. Surely this made her new rule for her workers all the more unfair.
On the flip side of the argument were those who pointed out that Mayer was hired to turn around a floundering company, and that company metrics indicated that one cause of that floundering might be the numbers of people who were not logging on to the Yahoo system as often as they should, were not producing as they once had, and were often found to be working on projects outside the Yahoo purview. Shouldn’t Mayer have the right to demand a certain level of commitment from her employees, even if that meant she had to keep an eye on them, physically, within the confines of the Yahoo office complex?
There are a variety of conflicting assumptions contributing to this situation. Mayer, being a young woman, is expected by many to represent the New Woman in industry and thus to embrace the freedoms that her foremothers fought to achieve, one of which is the flexibility to work from home. On the other hand, Mayer’s youth is thought by some to dictate her pulling away from the conventions of the women’s movement and moving back toward a tradition of teamwork and synchronous communication. Meanwhile, those who look at the bottom line and who know Yahoo intimately insist that Mayer had no choice in the matter—that one of the reasons for Yahoo’s demise was its far-flung workforce and lack of cohesion. Perhaps only time will tell whether Mayer’s decision was the right one for Yahoo; we might all check back in a year’s time to see where things stand.
Protesters flocked to point out that Mayer, herself a new mother, had installed at her own expense a nursery next door to her office, something no other working parent could possibly afford to do. Surely this made her new rule for her workers all the more unfair.
On the flip side of the argument were those who pointed out that Mayer was hired to turn around a floundering company, and that company metrics indicated that one cause of that floundering might be the numbers of people who were not logging on to the Yahoo system as often as they should, were not producing as they once had, and were often found to be working on projects outside the Yahoo purview. Shouldn’t Mayer have the right to demand a certain level of commitment from her employees, even if that meant she had to keep an eye on them, physically, within the confines of the Yahoo office complex?
There are a variety of conflicting assumptions contributing to this situation. Mayer, being a young woman, is expected by many to represent the New Woman in industry and thus to embrace the freedoms that her foremothers fought to achieve, one of which is the flexibility to work from home. On the other hand, Mayer’s youth is thought by some to dictate her pulling away from the conventions of the women’s movement and moving back toward a tradition of teamwork and synchronous communication. Meanwhile, those who look at the bottom line and who know Yahoo intimately insist that Mayer had no choice in the matter—that one of the reasons for Yahoo’s demise was its far-flung workforce and lack of cohesion. Perhaps only time will tell whether Mayer’s decision was the right one for Yahoo; we might all check back in a year’s time to see where things stand.
1. In the first paragraph, why does the author refer to Mayer’s decision as “radical”?
(A) It represented something that had never been tried before.
(B) It defied the traditions of that particular industry.
(C) It was almost militant in its adoption of feminist theory.
(D) It showed a fanatical commitment to company turnaround.
(E) It was extreme in its “all-or-nothing” approach.
(A) It represented something that had never been tried before.
(B) It defied the traditions of that particular industry.
(C) It was almost militant in its adoption of feminist theory.
(D) It showed a fanatical commitment to company turnaround.
(E) It was extreme in its “all-or-nothing” approach.
2. According to the passage, people who supported Mayer’s decision did so because of which of the following?
(A) It has been proved that telecommuting leads to a lack of productivity.
(B) Yahoo worked better back when everyone worked in the same office space.
(C) Compared to previous data, Yahoo workers seemed to be slacking off.
(D) She herself was able to balance work and family life without difficulty.
(E) Synchronicity is critical, especially for companies involved in high tech.
(A) It has been proved that telecommuting leads to a lack of productivity.
(B) Yahoo worked better back when everyone worked in the same office space.
(C) Compared to previous data, Yahoo workers seemed to be slacking off.
(D) She herself was able to balance work and family life without difficulty.
(E) Synchronicity is critical, especially for companies involved in high tech.
3. The author of the passage would most likely agree with which of the following statements?
(A) Mayer has made a grave error in pulling her employees back into the office.
(B) Working from home has been shown to increase, not decrease productivity.
(C) Yahoo’s history indicates that Mayer’s controlling attitude may backfire.
(D) Mayer is far too young to be held to the standards of the women’s movement.
(E) Mayer’s plan for Yahoo deserves to move forward and be judged later on.
(A) Mayer has made a grave error in pulling her employees back into the office.
(B) Working from home has been shown to increase, not decrease productivity.
(C) Yahoo’s history indicates that Mayer’s controlling attitude may backfire.
(D) Mayer is far too young to be held to the standards of the women’s movement.
(E) Mayer’s plan for Yahoo deserves to move forward and be judged later on.
4. How could the author’s attitude toward Mayer be characterized?
(A) Detached
(B) Derisive
(C) Deferential
(D) Derogatory
(E) Doting
(A) Detached
(B) Derisive
(C) Deferential
(D) Derogatory
(E) Doting
5. The author of the passage is primarily concerned with
(A) explaining the motivation for a decision
(B) showing the negative effects of a decision
(C) revealing the politics behind a decision
(D) presenting the attitudes toward a decision
(E) exploring the possible results of a decision
(A) explaining the motivation for a decision
(B) showing the negative effects of a decision
(C) revealing the politics behind a decision
(D) presenting the attitudes toward a decision
(E) exploring the possible results of a decision
RC Butler 2023 - Practice Two RC Passages Everyday.
Passage # 216 Date: 30-Jun-2023
This question is part of RC Butler 2023. Click here for Details
Passage # 216 Date: 30-Jun-2023
This question is part of RC Butler 2023. Click here for Details
15 Jul 2023, 01:33
Kudos
Bookmarks
Somebody please explain Q1 and Q4
15 Jul 2023, 12:27
Kudos
Bookmarks
tanishapriya96
Explanation
1. In the first paragraph, why does the author refer to Mayer’s decision as “radical”?
Explanation
Option (B) is correct because it aligns with the information provided in the passage. The passage states that flexibility in the workplace had been common, if not required, in the industry. Marissa Mayer's decision to ban telecommuting and enforce office work went against this prevailing practice and tradition of the industry. By taking such a stance and defying the established norms, Mayer's decision can be considered radical.
The author describes Mayer's decision as radical because it represented a departure from the expected or typical approach in the industry. Telecommuting and flexible work arrangements had become common in many companies, particularly in the technology sector, and were often seen as a way to attract and retain top talent. Mayer's decision to reverse this trend and require employees to work exclusively at the office was seen as a significant deviation from the industry's prevailing practices and expectations.
The passage highlights the contrasting assumptions about Mayer's decision. Some people expected Mayer, as a young woman in a leadership position, to embrace the flexibility in the workplace that previous generations fought for. This expectation is rooted in the idea that women should have the freedom to balance work and personal responsibilities, including the option to work from home. Therefore, Mayer's decision to ban telecommuting can be seen as defying the expectations associated with her position as a female leader and going against the perceived advancements made by the women's movement.
Overall, option (B) accurately reflects the main reason why the author refers to Mayer's decision as "radical": it defied the traditions and prevailing practices of the industry, which considered flexibility in the workplace as common, if not required.
Answer: B
Explanation
Option (B) is correct because it aligns with the information provided in the passage. The passage states that flexibility in the workplace had been common, if not required, in the industry. Marissa Mayer's decision to ban telecommuting and enforce office work went against this prevailing practice and tradition of the industry. By taking such a stance and defying the established norms, Mayer's decision can be considered radical.
The author describes Mayer's decision as radical because it represented a departure from the expected or typical approach in the industry. Telecommuting and flexible work arrangements had become common in many companies, particularly in the technology sector, and were often seen as a way to attract and retain top talent. Mayer's decision to reverse this trend and require employees to work exclusively at the office was seen as a significant deviation from the industry's prevailing practices and expectations.
The passage highlights the contrasting assumptions about Mayer's decision. Some people expected Mayer, as a young woman in a leadership position, to embrace the flexibility in the workplace that previous generations fought for. This expectation is rooted in the idea that women should have the freedom to balance work and personal responsibilities, including the option to work from home. Therefore, Mayer's decision to ban telecommuting can be seen as defying the expectations associated with her position as a female leader and going against the perceived advancements made by the women's movement.
Overall, option (B) accurately reflects the main reason why the author refers to Mayer's decision as "radical": it defied the traditions and prevailing practices of the industry, which considered flexibility in the workplace as common, if not required.
Answer: B
