Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 0608:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 3 of our GMAT Ninja Critical Reasoning series, we tackle Discrepancy, Paradox, and Explain an Oddity questions. You know the feeling: the passage gives you two facts that seem completely contradictory....- May 08
08:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
14 Mar 2015, 17:17
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
75% (01:17) correct
25%
(01:21)
wrong
based on 313
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
It seems likely that the jurors' decision to acquit the defendant may have been a result of the multiple contradictory statements by the prosecution's four witnesses.
A) may have been a result of the multiple contradictory statements by the prosecution's four witnesses
B) may have been a result of contradictory statements between the prosecution and its witnesses
C) resulted because of the four contradictory statements by the prosecution's multiple witnesses
D) resulted from multiple statements contradicting the prosecution's witnesses
E) resulted from multiple contradictory statements by the prosecution's four witnesses
A) may have been a result of the multiple contradictory statements by the prosecution's four witnesses
B) may have been a result of contradictory statements between the prosecution and its witnesses
C) resulted because of the four contradictory statements by the prosecution's multiple witnesses
D) resulted from multiple statements contradicting the prosecution's witnesses
E) resulted from multiple contradictory statements by the prosecution's four witnesses
14 Mar 2015, 21:24
Kudos
Bookmarks
Answer is E.
In the given sentence, use of "may" and "seem likely" together is redundant. So, options A nd B are out.
Correct idiomatic use is "X resulted from Y", so C is out.
D changes the intended meaning of the sentence.
In the given sentence, use of "may" and "seem likely" together is redundant. So, options A nd B are out.
Correct idiomatic use is "X resulted from Y", so C is out.
D changes the intended meaning of the sentence.
14 Mar 2015, 22:36
Kudos
Bookmarks
Felt that the meaning in answer D made more sense ! do we have to stick with intended meaning presented in A ?
crystal clear 
