Between 1892 and 1893, Claude Monet produced a series of paintings of

Question

Between 1892 and 1893, Claude Monet  produced a series of paintings of the Rouen Cathedral, revised in his studio in 1894, and with the French public receiving it  as an emblem of all that was noble about their history and customs.

(A) produced a series of paintings of the Rouen Cathedral, revised in his studio in 1894, and with the French public receiving it

(B) produced a series of paintings of the Rouen Cathedral, which he revised in his studio in 1894 and which the French public received

(C) produced a series of paintings of the Rouen Cathedral, which he revised in his studio in 1894, and that the French public received it

(D) painted the Rouen Cathedral, which he revised in his studio in 1894, and that the French public received it

(E) painted the Rouen Cathedral, revised in his studio in 1894, and the French public received it

Kurtosis · Answer

A) produced a series of paintings of the Rouen Cathedral, revised in his studio in 1894, and with the French public receiving it - Incorrect. Awkward.

B) produced a series of paintings of the Rouen Cathedral, which he revised in his studio in 1894 and which the French public received - Correct. 'which' correctly refers to the paintings and the sentence maintains the parallelism between 'which he revised' and 'which the French public received'.

C) produced a series of paintings of the Rouen Cathedral, which he revised in his studio in 1894, and that the French public received it - Incorrect. Awkward

D) painted the Rouen Cathedral, which he revised in his studio in 1894, and that the French public received it - Incorrect. Meaning error + Parallelism error

E) painted the Rouen Cathedral, revised in his studio in 1894, and the French public received it - Incorrect. Meaning error.

Answer: B

HMC · Answer

Friends ..Can anyone help me with the "touch" rule ... here is my doubt ...

"a series of paintings of the Rouen Cathedral, which" - Here I thought which referred "Rouen Cathedral", the nearest noun 
But that is wrong I think. Because here 'which' semms to refer - "a series of paintings of the Rouen Cathedral" ...

Harley1980 · Answer

Hello HMC You are absolutely right, in this example a series of paintings of the Rouen Cathedral, which of the Rouen Cathedral is the modifier of series and because of this which modify not the Cathedral but series . Here is the really cool article from Magoosh about this rule and about this question: https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/modifiers- ... orrection/

sairam595 · Answer

Between 1892 and 1893, Claude Monet  produced a series of paintings of the Rouen Cathedral, revised in his studio in 1894, and with the French public receiving it  as an emblem of all that was noble about their history and customs.

A) produced a series of paintings of the Rouen Cathedral, revised in his studio in 1894, and with the French public receiving it
(verb-ed modifier modifies closest noun- here revised modifying RC -makes no sense)
B) produced a series of paintings of the Rouen Cathedral, which he revised in his studio in 1894 and which the French public received
which modifies series of paintings & which xxx and which xxxx maintains parallelism
C) produced a series of paintings of the Rouen Cathedral, which he revised in his studio in 1894, and that the French public received it
here comma+and starts a new independent clause ( it means which he revised in his studio in 1894 and french public reveived don't have any relation)
this is wrong as two actions are inter-related.
also is this sentence correct if we have which xx and that xx (comma removed) ! pls advise
D) painted the Rouen Cathedral, which he revised in his studio in 1894, and that the French public received it ( CM painted RC -wrong)
E) painted the Rouen Cathedral, revised in his studio in 1894, and the French public received it ( CM painted RC -wrong)

daagh · Answer

Some time ago, I saw an authoritative chapter on the logical sense of the syntax and semantics of the relative pronoun ‘which’ in a book called the “Sentence Correction Nirvana’ released by EducationAisle. It might help to fix the vexatious problem of the touch rule of ‘which’.

grimbergen · Answer

Can anyone explain about this? I wonder whether "produced a series of paitings of the Rouen Cathedral, which he revised in his studio in 1894 and that the French public received"(without comma and without "it") would work. Would you consider this as a correctly paralleled structure?

sayantanc2k · Answer

The use of "that" is problematic. The relative pronoun "that" is used for an essential modifier, a modifier that defines the noun it refers to. However here a non-essential modifier is required - something additional is said about the paintings. Therefore using "which" in place of "that" is preferred. Option B is correct in using "which" for both the modifiers.

AR15J · Answer

As per the correct answer choice, below sentence is correct.

Between 1892 and 1893, Claude Monet produced a series of paintings of the Rouen Cathedral, which he revised in his studio in 1894 and which the French public received as an emblem of all that was noble about their history and customs.

Is it correct to use the two or more than two modifiers by connecting them with "and"(comma and "and" in case of more than two modifier)? Are the below sentences correct?

1. Ram, the son of Dhashrath , the husband of seeta and the king of Ayodhya was exiled from Ayodhya for 14 years.

2. Ram, who was the son of Dhashrath , who was the husband of seeta and who was the king of Ayodhya was exiled from Ayodhya for 14 years.

3. Ram, the son of Koshalya and the husband of seeta was exiled from Ayodhya for 14 years.

4 Ram, the son of Koshalya, the king of Ayodhya and the husband of seeta was exiled from Ayodhya for 14 years.

sayantanc2k · Answer

Yes it is alright to separate modifiers (even relative clause modifiers) referring to the same noun with conjunctions. All your sentences are grammatically alright.

AR15J · Answer

First two sentences in which husband can refer to both Ram and Dashrath are not ambiguous?

aragonn · Answer

Official Explanation

Split #1: look at the modifier "revised in his studio" or "which he revised in his studio" --- both of those are correct in and of themselves. BUT, what do they modify? Clearly, the "series of paintings" could be revised in Monet's studio, but the cathedral itself couldn't fit inside someone's studio. (D) & (E) are entirely incorrect.

Split #2: pronoun problem. In (C) & (D), the pronoun "that" refers to the series of paintings, so the appearance of the second pronoun "it" for the same thing is incorrect.

Split #3: Choice (A) has the structure "with" + [noun] + [participial phrase]. The GMAT does not like this construction. If you want to describe a full action, use a full [noun]+[verb] clause. Because of this, (A) is wrong.

This leaves (B) as the only possible answer.

FAQ: Doesn't "which" refer to Rouen Cathedral?

A: This is an awesome question about the use of "which" and what we call the "touch rule." Oftentimes, "which" clauses modify the nouns that they "touch" or immediately follow.

But there are exceptions to the "touch rule." In this case [of paintings of the Rouen Cathedral] is a vital modifier of the noun "series" because it specifies WHICH "series" we are talking about. Therefore, "which" can refer to the noun "series" before the vital modifier.

So (B) is okay and correct.

In contrast, the "which" in (D) MUST refer to cathedral-the "touch" rule applies-- so (D) is incorrect. (E) has the same problem: "revised in his studio" incorrectly refers to "cathedral."

Pankaj0901 · Answer

Hi  AndrewN , request you to please help in clarifying 2 doubts here.

1. In this below example, "who" in the sentence "who was the husband of seeta" refers to "Dhashrath" or to "Ram"? Since, "who" is touching "Dashrath" noun. And "who" is also forming parallel structure for the noun "Ram". How do we identify which one is being implied?

2. Ram, who was the son of Dhashrath , who was the husband of seeta and who was the king of Ayodhya was exiled from Ayodhya for 14 years.

2. In the same examples: should there not be a "comma" after the non-essential modifier that would separate the noun and the rest part of the sentence? That is, 
->  Noun + "," + non-essential modifier  + "," +  verb  
Instead of:  Noun + "," + non-essential modifier +   ","   + verb

For example, the below sentence with comma shouldn't be the correct usage?
Ram, who was the son of Dhashrath , who was the husband of seeta and who was the king of Ayodhya   ","   was exiled from Ayodhya for 14 years.

AndrewN · Answer

Hello,  Pankaj0901 . I am just as confused as you when I look at the sentence in question below, and I propose a rewrite for the sake of clarity. I will respond in-line.

My initial reading of the sentence was that it was a sort of list of historical personages, and I interpreted the  husband of Seeta  as Dhashrath. But I am not satisfied with the lack of a comma at the end in an apparent attempt to clarify that Ram was actually the husband. That is, even if I cut out the part about Dhashrath, I would still contain the non-essential modifier within double commas, em dashes, or parentheses:

Ram, who was the husband of Seeta and who was the king of Ayodhya, was exiled from Ayodhya.

The ambiguity could be cut out altogether by rearranging the sequence of information in the following manner (just one example):

Ram, who was the husband of Seeta, who was the king of Ayodhya, and who was the son of Dhashrath, was exiled from Ayodhya.

Provided the reader knew that Seeta was a female name or at least a name that would not be paired with  king , the sentence would add much needed clarity.

Yes, as discussed above, a modifying clause or even an appositive phrase on its own will either use double punctuation or no punctuation  on the GMAT™  for the sake of grammatical consistency. A single comma should not be used to denote a non-essential modifier unless a period wraps up the sentence where the second comma would be. On the GMAT™, I would expect all of the following sentences to be incorrect:

If I find any examples that show otherwise from any edition of the OG from the past decade, I will let you know. Be careful not to mix real-world grammar and GMAT™ grammar on points in which the two differ. In the sentence about Monet, the two  which  clauses merely form a compound modifier, and ambiguity of meaning does not enter the picture.

- Andrew

Prriyanka · Answer

Hey everyone,

It would be of great help if someone explains why E is incorrect?

Thanks,
Prriyanka

AndrewN · Answer

Hello, Prriyanka. Since you asked about (E), I will restrict my analysis to the same. How about we look at the sentence with (E) inserted?

The beginning of the underlined portion is problematic because it conveys a dual meaning without one or the other being a clearcut winner:

1) Claude Monet  painted  a cathedral (just as I might paint a fence); or
2) Claude Monet  created a painting of  a cathedral

The rest of the sentence offers no clue as to which interpretation is correct, at least not without the test-taker bringing background knowledge to the table. (Presumably, the famous artist Claude Monet would create a painting of his subject.)

A similar issue concerning (E) is the pronoun  it  that appears at the end of the underlined portion. To what does that pronoun refer? Again, is it the cathedral itself, which seems the logical referent, or an unnamed painting of the cathedral? You have to be careful not to assume that the meaning conveyed is what you want it to be. The only answers that clarify what Monet was painting are (A) through (C), so we would need to look there for further splits.

Finally, the phrase modifier  revised in his studio in 1894  is, once again, tethered loosely to the sentence. I guess it may seem far-fetched to revise a cathedral in a studio, but some installation artists work on a grand scale, and the grammar is not helping us here. Notice that by clarifying that  paintings  were made, choices (B) and (C) fix all these issues. ((A) still places the modifier in a tight spot.) The decision should really be between those two.

I hope that helps clarify why (E), at least, is not the best answer of the bunch. Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew

Prriyanka · Answer

Hi Andrew, Thanks for your insight.. This was of great help

- Prriyanka

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

Between 1892 and 1893, Claude Monet produced a series of paintings of

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

Between 1892 and 1893, Claude Monet produced a series of paintings of

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards