Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 3001:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
May 0306:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
11 Feb 2019, 05:12
Kudos
Bookmarks
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
83% (01:09) correct
17%
(01:10)
wrong
based on 129
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Although its policy for honorary doctorates was not dissimilar to Cambridge or Oxford — they gave awards to the “distinguished” in particular fields, and the person had to be “widely recognized” — it is clear that the universities were drawn to the entertainment industries to produce visible personalities for their convocation ceremonies, and the idea of “widely recognized” trumped any other distinction.
(A) its policy for honorary doctorates was not dissimilar to
(B) their policies for awarding honorary doctorates were not dissimilar to those of
(C) their policies for honorary doctorates was not dissimilar from
(D) its policy for honorary doctorates was very similar to
(E) its policies for awarding honorary doctorates was very similar to that of
(A) its policy for honorary doctorates was not dissimilar to
(B) their policies for awarding honorary doctorates were not dissimilar to those of
(C) their policies for honorary doctorates was not dissimilar from
(D) its policy for honorary doctorates was very similar to
(E) its policies for awarding honorary doctorates was very similar to that of
eswarchethu135
GMAT 2: 640 Q49 V27
Posts: 276
11 Feb 2019, 07:20
Kudos
Bookmarks
Although its policy for honorary doctorates was not dissimilar to Cambridge or Oxford — they gave awards to the “distinguished” in particular fields, and the person had to be “widely recognized” — it is clear that the universities were drawn to the entertainment industries to produce visible personalities for their convocation ceremonies, and the idea of “widely recognized” trumped any other distinction.
(A) its policy for honorary doctorates was not dissimilar to - here policy is being compared to Cambridge. Irrelevant. ELIMINATED
(B) their policies for awarding honorary doctorates were not dissimilar to those of - Only CORRECT choice
(C) their policies for honorary doctorates was not dissimilar from - "policies" --> "was" pronoun error. ELIMINATED
(D) its policy for honorary doctorates was very similar to - here policy is being compared to Cambridge. Irrelevant. ELIMINATED
(E) its policies for awarding honorary doctorates was very similar to that of - "policies" --> "was" pronoun error. ELIMINATED
OPTION: B
(A) its policy for honorary doctorates was not dissimilar to - here policy is being compared to Cambridge. Irrelevant. ELIMINATED
(B) their policies for awarding honorary doctorates were not dissimilar to those of - Only CORRECT choice
(C) their policies for honorary doctorates was not dissimilar from - "policies" --> "was" pronoun error. ELIMINATED
(D) its policy for honorary doctorates was very similar to - here policy is being compared to Cambridge. Irrelevant. ELIMINATED
(E) its policies for awarding honorary doctorates was very similar to that of - "policies" --> "was" pronoun error. ELIMINATED
OPTION: B
12 Feb 2019, 12:26
Kudos
Bookmarks
Although its policy for honorary doctorates was not dissimilar to Cambridge or Oxford — they gave awards to the “distinguished” in particular fields, and the person had to be “widely recognized” — it is clear that the universities were drawn to the entertainment industries to produce visible personalities for their convocation ceremonies, and the idea of “widely recognized” trumped any other distinction.
(A) its policy for honorary doctorates was not dissimilar to( its incorrectly refers to plural universities)
(B) their policies for awarding honorary doctorates were not dissimilar to those of( correct)
(C) their policies for honorary doctorates was not dissimilar from( incorrect comparison)
(D) its policy for honorary doctorates was very similar to( same as in E)
(E) its policies for awarding honorary doctorates was very similar to that of( its incorrectly refers to plural universities)
Will go with choice B.
Thanks & Regards
Posted from my mobile device
(A) its policy for honorary doctorates was not dissimilar to( its incorrectly refers to plural universities)
(B) their policies for awarding honorary doctorates were not dissimilar to those of( correct)
(C) their policies for honorary doctorates was not dissimilar from( incorrect comparison)
(D) its policy for honorary doctorates was very similar to( same as in E)
(E) its policies for awarding honorary doctorates was very similar to that of( its incorrectly refers to plural universities)
Will go with choice B.
Thanks & Regards
Posted from my mobile device
