OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Day 182: Sentence Correction (SC1)
THE PROMPTQuote:
The Battle of Bull Run, which took place on July 21, 1861, near the town of Manassas,
an important event in American history in that this historic event was the first major ground battle of the Civil War, which resulted in over 500,000 deaths and a turning of the tide against the practice of slavery.
I usually strip sentences.
After you read the prompt, something should seem very strange. Strip the sentence to figure out what seems strange.
The Battle of Bull Run,
which took place on July 21, 1861, near the town of Manassas, an important event in American history
in that this
historic event was the first major ground battle of the Civil War, which resulted in X and Y.
over 500,000 deaths and a turning of the tide against the practice of slaveryThis is the stripped sentence
The Battle of Bull Run, an important event in American history in that this event was the first major ground battle of the Civil War, which resulted in X and Y.
Yes, definitely strange: the sentence lacks a verb. The subject is The Battle of Bull Run.
The Battle of Bull run IS an important event in American history in that [because] ABC . . .
The Battle of Bull run WAS an important event in American history in that [because] ABC . . .
THE OPTIONSQuote:
A) The Battle of Bull Run, which took place on July 21, 1861, near the town of Manassas,
[VERB???] an important event in American history in that this historic event was the first major ground battle of the Civil War, which resulted in over 500,000 deaths and a turning of the tide against the practice of slavery • The sentence lacks a verb.
• the phrase
in that this historic event is wordy and weird. Not enough to eliminate, but look for it elsewhere.
• "turning of the tide" is okay because no dedicated noun exists for "turning" as it is used in this sentence. Both deaths and turning are nouns.
The phrasing is not great, but it is grammatical.
Eliminate A
Quote:
B) The Battle of Bull Run, which took place on July 21, 1861, near the town of Manassas,
[VERB? IS? WAS?] an important event in American history, marking the first major ground battle of the Civil War, which resulted in the death of over 500,000 Americans and the abolition of slavery • Like option A, option B lacks a working verb.
• "marking the first major ground battle of the Civil War" explains the preceding information and should be set off with a comma after
history so that we can see why The Battle of Bull Run, [date], [place], is important.
Eliminate B
Quote:
C) The Battle of Bull Run, which took place on July 21, 1861, near the town of Manassas,
was an important event in American history as it had marked the first major ground battle of the Civil War, which resulted in the death of over 500,000 Americans and the abolition of slaverythe past tense was gives the false impression that the Battle was at some point in the past important, but it is not important today; the past perfect tense had marked is incorrect
•
was is the wrong verb tense. Did this epic battle
stop being an important event in U.S. history?
The Battle of Bull Run IS still important. We need IS.
• no reason exists to use past perfect (had + verbED)
-- if two events occur in the past and one happens before the other, we use had + ___ED (past participle, verbED) to talk about the earlier event.
-- but we don't need to use past perfect to talk about "the past of the past": even if "was" weren't wrong, the simple past tense "marked" is just fine. (Simple tenses are preferred when possible.)
Eliminate C
Quote:
D) The Battle of Bull Run, which took place on July 21, 1861, near the town of Manassas,
is an important event in American history due to it marking the first major ground battle of the Civil War, resulting in the death of over 500,000 Americans and the abolition of slavery Shishou , I did not see your argument until after I posted, but your argument is very good.
Absent outside knowledge, we have know way to know whether the Battle of Bull Run or the Civil War caused 500,000 deaths.
We don't know which one abolished slavery.
I think we can guess. A battle is part of a larger war. Both are mentioned.
Although we can guess, the matter should be clear.
• DUE TO Ultimate conclusion:
Due to is problematic and not nearly as good as the construction in E --
due to it marking at best is not as clear as the companion phrase in (E) (
as it marked).
DUE TO does not function well in the sentence
--
due to cannot modify a clause.
When subject complements get in the mix, things are tricky.
That is,
due to explains why The Battle of Bull run is an
important event in American history.
That battle was the first major ground battle of the Civil War.
Replace DUE TO with CAUSED BY
-- Replacing "due to" with "caused by" is not always an accurate test, but we should try anyway.
-- Replacement is a disaster:
The Battle of Bull Run . . . is an important event . . . caused by it marking the first major ground battle of the Civil War.
Ouch.•
Compare - E is better than D
Before struggling full on with "due to" (I hate the phrase and never use it), we
can say these things
--
due to should be followed by a noun.
What the option says now is not great:
--
[[due to] it marking the first major ground battle of the Civil War-- That phrase is not very noun-lilke.
Better:
its marking [of?] the first major ground battle of the Civil War.
-- Now insert "caused by": The Battle is an important event in American history, caused by it marking the first major ground battle of the Civil War. (Bad.)
-- The event itself was not caused by its having been the first major ground battle of the Civil War.
-- The event's
importance was caused by its having been the first major ground battle of the Civil War.
I think we need a noun such as
importance for "due to" to modify.
At the least, due to is not as clear as the construction in (E): The Battle of Bull run . . .is important as [because] it marked the first major ground battle of the Civil War.
•
COMMA + RESULTING--
resulting in the death of over 500,000 illogically modifies the
subject of the clause that precedes the phrase (The Battle of Bull Run). Written this way, "resulting . . . " seems to imply that more than half a million people died in this one battle.
-- in rare cases, [comma + ing] modifies the immediately preceding noun. But if you have an option that is grammatical and uses [comma + __ING}, choose that option.
Quote:
E) The Battle of Bull Run, which took place on July 21, 1861, near the town of Manassas,
is an important event in American history as it marked the first major ground battle of the Civil War, which resulted in the death of over 500,000 Americans and the abolition of slavery. • the subject correctly takes the present tense IS
• the [comma + which] structure modifies the immediately preceding noun (the Civil War), a modification that is accurate and clear.
The whole Civil War resulted in more than 500,000 deaths and the abolition of slavery—not the Battle of Bull Run.
• [comma + which] is better than option D's "resulting in . . ." structure.
The answer is E GMAC does not test the difference between answers D and E this closely very often, but it does test the [comma + __ING] vs [comma + which] quite regularly.
COMMENTSsathik63 , welcome to SC Butler (and
anvesh004 , I am not sure whether I ever welcomed you, so if I did, you get two welcomes).
These answers range from very good to excellent.
I like the distinctive voices and personalities. And the varied approaches help people who follow. Understanding the way SC works is easier when an aspirant can see more than one approach to a problem.
Very nice work. Kudos to all.