Project SC Butler: Day 233 Sentence Correction (SC1)
• HIGHLIGHTSIssues tested:
-- parallelism. Items in a list must exhibit parallel structure.
-- verb tense
-- style. In option B,
the tossing of a coin is more awkward than phrasing in other choices such as options C and E, which state "tossing a coin."
Gerunds (verbINGs) rather than dedicated nouns?
-- Generally, GMAC prefers dedicated nouns (e.g. the
toss of a coin) over gerunds (the
tossing of a coin).
-- On the other hand, we are kinda stuck with ___ING because in all five choices, two of the three list items are ___ING nouns (playing and drawing).
In that case, GMAC requires us to use "toss" in its gerund form, too.
In other words,
tossING a coin,
playing a round of poker, and
drawing straws are all parallel.
Quote:
Although deciding the outcome of an election by chance may seem antiquated,
a toss of a coin, playing a round of poker, and drawing straws are all methods that have been used within the span of 15 years to determine the winner of a deadlocked election somewhere in the United States.
A) a
toss of a coin, playing a round of poker, and drawing straws are all methods that have been used
B)
the tossing of a coin, playing a round of poker, and drawing straws are all methods that have been used
C) tossing a coin, playing a round of poker, and drawing straws are all methods that
would have been used
D)
a toss of a coin, playing a round of poker, and drawing straws are all methods that
had been used
E) tossing a coin, playing a round of poker, and drawing straws are all methods that have been used
• Split #1: parallelismAll five options contain the phrasing, "playing a round of poker, and drawing straws."
Options A and D break parallelism by using "a toss of a coin."
We need
tossing.
Tossing a coin is parallel to
playing a round of poker and to
drawing strawsEliminate A and D
Option B uses
the tossing of a coin, which is a very awkward construction, especially compared to the simple phrase in options C and E, "tossing a coin."
Eliminate B.
• Split #2 - verb tensesWe are down to C and E.
Option C incorrectly states "
methods that would have been used. . . "
If the sentence were hypothetical, option C would be okay.
But the sentence is not hypothetical. These methods have actually been used.
Eliminate C.
Option D (already eliminated on other grounds) incorrectly states "
methods that had been used."
HAD + BEEN + past participle (verbED) = "past perfect" in the passive voice
In order to use the past perfect, often described as
the past of the past, we need one at least one event to be rendered in simple past tense, or we need a time marker.
Correct:
By the time he was released from a North Vietnam POW camp in 1973, the late Senator John McCain had been horribly tortured for almost six years and had refused early release because others had been prisoners longer than he. Here→ One past tense verb exists:
was released→ A time stamp also exists:
By the time .. . in 1973 Ungrammatical (though factually accurate, here) :
The late Senator John McCain had been disparaged by Donald Trump as "not a war hero."→ neither a time stamp nor an event in simple past tense exists
→
had been disparaged should be
was disparaged Option E uses the correct verb tense to talk about something recent and/or ongoing.
We have a couple of clues about timing:
→ Recent events only
seem antiquated
→ "within THE span of 15 years" means "in the last 15 years, X, Y, and Z have been used."
We use HAVE + BEEN + _____ED to talk about events that started in the past and continue into the present or that ended in the very recent past.
HAVE + BEEN + __ED is the passive voice of the present perfect.
The best answer is ECOMMENTSI really enjoy the way that most of you try to explain your answers for your fellow aspirants.
In this time of chaos, it is good to see people helping one another. Kudos to all.