OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONQuote:
Even an act as apparently benign as
eliminating mosquitoes could have serious ecological affects because they interact with other species in ways that scientists do not yet fully understand.
A) eliminating mosquitoes could have serious ecological
affects because
they interact
B) the elimination of mosquitoes
can have serious ecological
affects because mosquitoes interact
C) eliminating mosquitoes could have serious ecological
affects because
they interact
D)
to eliminate mosquitoes
can have serious ecological effects because
they interact
E) eliminating mosquitoes could have serious ecological effects because mosquitoes interact
• Split #1: affects vs. effects We have a 3-2 split, one that even native speakers have a hard time with. (In terms of difficulty, the affect/effect split is right up there with
between you and I and
between you and me. The second phrase is correct.)
The word in question should be a noun.
Eliminating mosquitoes
could have a bad result. A result is a
noun. Eliminating mosquitoes could have serious ecological
effects.
Almost always, the word
effects with an "e" is a noun.
Almost always, the word
affects with an "a" is a verb.
Options A, B, and C incorrectly use the verb
affects.Eliminate A, B, and C
I have seen a few mnemonics to help you remember the difference between the two words.
Think:
Affect starts with an
A and is an
Action (a verb),
whereas
Effect starts with an
E and is an
End-result (a noun)
(Yes, I know that the mnemonic is corny. I also know that it works.)
• Split #3: option D contains a few errors• The gerund
eliminating is better than the infinitive
to eliminate (that situation is almost entirely idiomatic -- don't worry too much about it because other errors in D are worse)
• The verb
can in options D and B is not nearly as good a choice as "could have" in the other options.
-- Remember to pay attention to the nonunderlined portion.
The words
scientists do not yet understand signal that the sentence describes a hypothetical situation.
Could have (meaning
might have) correctly expresses uncertainty.
•
they is ambiguous.
--
They could refer to
mosquitoes or
ecological effects• finally, compare option D to option E: no contest.
Option E does not contain the same problems as option D does.
Eliminate D
The best answer is E.• including the noun
mosquitoes avoids the problems with
they•
could have is more accurate than
can. The situation is hypothetical, so we need a
could (might), not a
can.COMMENTSsparshgs97 , welcome to SC Butler.
I'll keep this one short.
The answers range from good to very good. Kudos to all.