OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC1)
THE PROMPTQuote:
Oscar Arias, who won the Nobel Peace Prize for these efforts in 1987, submitted a peace plan for a series of disputes which led to the Esquipulas Peace Agreement among multiple nations of Central America, namely El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Honduras, and Panama, at a time when various armed conflicts were threatening the stability of the Central American region. • Meaning is a bit difficult to tease out. Do not get stuck. Generally, we that
1) at one point, armed conflicts threatened the stability of the Central American region
2) Oscar Arias set in motion what would become a peace agreement among many nations in that region, and
3) Arias won a Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts
THE OPTIONSQuote:
A) Oscar Arias, who won the Nobel Peace Prize for these efforts in 1987, submitted a peace plan for a series of disputes
which led to the Esquipulas Peace Agreement among multiple nations of Central America, namely El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Honduras, and Panama, at a time when various armed conflicts were threatening the stability of the Central American region.
•
which should be
that→
which introduces non-essential material and
is always set off by a comma or commas, whereas
→
that introduces essential material and
is almost never set off by a comma or commas
Takeaway: if you see a
which that directly defines (modifies) a noun and is
not set off by a comma or commas, be suspicious
• "these efforts" refers to a specific something or other
before telling us about those very efforts.
Although pronouns can precede their antecedents, (1) "these efforts" is plural, but Arias's effort seems to have been singular (he submitted a peace plan), and
(2) when we refer to something specific such as winning the Nobel Prize for "these efforts," it does not make a lot of sense to keep the reader waiting to learn about those efforts
• this sentence is poorly constructed
→ the time sequence is jumbled or at least hard to follow
→ options D and E present the events in a more sensible order
Because X happened, Oscar Arias did ABC, which led to a Good Thing; Arias won the Nobel Peace Prize for his contribution.
ELIMINATE A
Quote:
B) Oscar Arias submitted a peace plan
, which was for a series of disputes leading to the Esquipulas Peace Agreement among multiple nations of Central America, namely El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Honduras, and Panama, at a time when various armed conflicts were threatening the stability of the Central American region,
earning him the Nobel Peace Prize in 1987.
•
which should be
that→ what the peace plan was
for is essential information
→ GMAC still tests the issue (although if published official materials are any gauge, GMAC does not test this issue as often as it did 5-10 years ago).
SPOILER ALERT In OG 2020, SC #824 explicitly tests the which/that distinction.
That official question is
here.
• at the end of the sentence,
earning him the Nobel Peace Prize in 1987 is disconnected from its subject, the peace plan.
→ verbING words can modify the previous clause or subject of that clause. Sometimes whatever ___ING words modify can be far away, but this placement makes the sentence hard to follow and the modifier hard to understand. Arias did not earn the Nobel Prize because various armed conflicts were threatening the stability of the Central American region.
ELIMINATE B
Quote:
C)
Being the receptor of the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts in 1987,
Oscar Arias submitted a peace plan for a series of various armed conflicts that were threatening the stability of the Cen¬tral American region which led to the Esquipulas Peace Agreement between El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Honduras, and Panama.
• illogical
→ this sentence implies that because Arias had already won the Nobel Peace Prize, Arias then submitted a peace plan
→ that declaration is exactly backwards
• especially in situations in which treaties are involved, the word
between may well be okay for more than two countries.
→ among is probably better. I would not eliminate this option on this basis alone. The logic problem, however, is fatal.
ELIMINATE C
Quote:
D) At a time when various armed conflicts were threatening the stability of the Central American region, Oscar Arias submitted a peace plan
which led to the Esquipulas Peace Agreement
being signed between El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Honduras, and Panama; his contribution earned him the Nobel Peace Prize in 1987.
•
which should be
that (see option A)
•
being signed is not needed
• especially in the context of treaties to which many countries are a party, the word
between can be used, though GMAC prefers
among when more than two entities are involved and rarely uses between in such cases
ELIMINATE D
Quote:
E) At a time when various armed conflicts were threatening the stability of the Central American region, Oscar Arias submitted a peace plan
that led to the Esquipulas Peace Agreement
among El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Honduras, and Panama; his contribution earned him the Nobel Peace Prize in 1987.
• bingo
→
that is used correctly
→ the preferred "among" is used
→ the sequence makes sense, and the sentence is both clear and concise
The best answer is ECOMMENTSAnshurana , welcome to SC Butler.
I am in the midst of the most important U.S. election in my lifetime.
I'm gonna keep this one short.
I really like the way that many people decided to try to understand the general meaning of the sentence.
If you explained well, you get kudos.
By explained well, I mean: could a GMAT aspirant read your explanation and understand what is wrong with the sentence?
For the most part, nicely done, everyone.