OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC1)
THE PROMPTQuote:
An interesting trend that has been observed over the past few years is
of enterprising freelance reporters, newly funded by non-profits, who make extensive use of social media, including blogs and Twitter, to foster a public conversation about key issues.
• Verb tense?
We use present progressive to describe a trend:
are making is correct—and better than this option's simple present
make.
• In this sentence,
that = the fact that→
is is a linking verb
→ just after the linking verb comes a subject complement, which is almost always a noun, pronoun, or adjective.
→ A subject complement is almost never a prepositional phrase unless the phrase is locative, this way:
The best time of night is after midnight. This sentence is a fairly rare example in which a prepositional phrase is a subject complement. "After midnight" is "locative" because it locates the subject in time.
→ the subject complement is
the fact that enterprising reporters . . . are making extensive use of social media.
→ Invert the sentence:
[The fact] that reporters are making extensive use of social media is an interesting trend that has been observed over the past few years.
→ Try inverting with "of reporters."
Of enterprising reporters who are making extensive use of social media is an interesting trend that has been observed over the past few years. 
UGH.
Upshot: in this context,
trend should logically be followed by
that.• Idiom
Correct:
to foster Wrong:
for fosteringTHE OPTIONSQuote:
A) of enterprising freelance reporters, newly funded by non-profits,
who make extensive use of social media, including blogs and Twitter, to foster
• To describe a trend, use present progressive
are making rather than simple present
make• Meaning - kinda nonsensical
→ How do you have a trend OF reporters? The word "of"
anchors the phrase.→ That is, the use of the words
of and
who illogically suggest that the trend is
of freelance reporters and not
that freelance reporters
are doing something.
• the insertion of
newly funded by non-profits between
reporters and
who is okay.
Sometimes that- and who-clauses are separated from their noun by a short intervening phrase.
This phrase is actually a relative clause that has been reduced.
Newly funded by non-profits means [reporters]
WHO ARE [or WHO HAVE BEEN] newly funded by non-profits.→ In a "reduced relative clause," the relative pronoun (who) is removed; the "to be" verb (are) is removed; and the past participle is left where it is (newly funded).
→ Stylistically, the shortened phrase
newly funded by non-profits is sleek.
There is no absolute rule against separating a relative pronoun from its noun.
Such separation is not common, but it is not ipso facto wrong.
As I mentioned, short phrases can intervene between a noun and its who-clause.
ELIMINATE A
Quote:
B)
of enterprising freelance reporters
who are making extensive use of social media including blogs and Twitter, newly funded by non-profits, and fostering
• Meaning
→ same problem as that in option A
• Ambiguity/Confusion
Is
Twitter newly funded by non-profits? (If so, which ones? The NRA? The Hoover Foundation? AEI? The Heritage Foundation?)
Or are the reporters newly funded by non-profits?
ELIMINATE B
Quote:
C)
of enterprising freelance reporters, newly funded by non-profits,
[who are] making extensive use of social media, including blogs and Twitter,
for fostering• Verb? Probably okay.
Making is probably a reduced relative clause.
From this: reporters .. . who are making extensive use of social media
To this: reporters . . . making extensive use of social media
• Meaning
→ How do we understand a trend OF freelance reporters? Similar to the problem in options A and B, the phrasing is nonsensical.
• for fostering is unidiomatic
ELIMINATE C
Quote:
D) that enterprising freelance reporters, newly funded by non-profits, are making extensive use of social media, including blogs and Twitter, to foster
• I do not see any errors
• This option uses
that [the fact that] to describe the trend, a description that makes a lot more sense than do those that begin with "of."
• correct verb tense
→ The verb
are making signifies that the reporters have been doing something on an ongoing basis.
•
To foster is the correct idiomatic expression.
KEEP
Quote:
E) that enterprising freelance reporters, newly funded by non-profits,
make extensive use of social media, including blogs and Twitter,
for fostering• to describe a trend,
are making (present progressive) is preferred to simple present (
make).
→ The simple present tense verb
make muddies the meaning of the sentence by omitting reference to the fact that the reporters have been doing something on an ongoing basis.
• incorrect idiom
→ The use of
for fostering is unidiomatic.
ELIMINATE E
The answer is D.COMMENTS@AtashM , you wrote:
Quote:
1. Is it right to use the below reason to eliminate A?
'The modifier 'who make extensive use of social media' is supposed to modify the EFRs. The way it is placed, besides non profits, creates an ambiguity as to what it is trying to modify'
No.
That modifier is in the same place in every option except B.
I explained above that a short phrase can intervene between a noun and its who-clause.
The use of
who, in fact, tells us that the modified noun
cannot be non-profits.
The word
who is used only for people.
True pronoun ambiguity exists when there is more than one noun that could logically be the antecedent or referent of the pronoun.
That situation is not the case here.
Non-profits are not eligible to be modified with
who.
True pronoun ambiguity is rare on the GMAT.
Just because something could theoretically be ambiguous does not make that thing actually ambiguous.
Quote:
2. Is 'of' vs 'that' a split that can be used?
Yes.
I've explained above.
Also, read
Fdambro294 's post.
Quote:
Doesn't the below sentence make sense?
An interesting trend that has been observed over the past few years is of enterprising freelance reporters, newly funded by non-profits, making extensive use of social media, including blogs and Twitter, to foster a public conversation about key issues.
Not really.
I can understand what you are saying, but it sounds strange to me.
This sentence makes sense:
An interesting trend . . . is THAT OF enterprising freelance reporters, newly funded by non-profits, making extensive use of social media . . .or, better,
An interesting trend is the fact that enterprising reporters ARE making extensive use of social media.I've explained this issue in as many ways as I can and used examples.
I have a challenge for any or all of you: explain to me why answer ____ is
better than answer D.
One of the best ways to get good at SC is to figure out why the correct answer is correct.
What small or large thing sets it apart?
In the OGs , what patterns do you see?
Making the case for incorrect answers is not terribly helpful.
Ask yourself: what is
right about the correct answer?
What do I need to learn from that correct answer to put into my arsenal?
I hope that the analysis helps.
This question appears to be harder than I thought to parse.
Kudos to all. Nicely done.