sumitkrocks
B) much of the local worshipper’s practice was premised on the concept of exchange as gods and goddesses bestowed gifts while humans gave offerings as an expression of thanks and constructed sacred precincts in which to worship
Issue in A is rectified.
"for worship" is precise than "Precincts in which to worship". Also, IMO, not sure though, relative pronoun "which" must have it's own full fledged verb and we know infinitive resembles a verb but not a full fledged verb in its own.
I request generis to share his thoughts on the use of "which + infinitive". Should we always look for full fledged verb for relative noun "which"?
I believe "which + infinitive" is not commonly acceptable as infinitive is not a full fledged verb in its own.
Keep sumitkrocks , an excellent question!
You wrote:
Quote:
Also, IMO, not sure though, relative pronoun "which" must have it's own full fledged verb and we know infinitive resembles a verb but not a full fledged verb in its own. I request
generis to share his thoughts on the use of "which + infinitive". Should we always look for full fledged verb for relative noun "which"?
Short answer: no, but only in special cases such as the situation we find in this instance.
This relative pronoun,
which, is the object (complement) of a preposition (
in).
In 99.9% of cases, the object of a preposition cannot be the subject of a clause and thus is not connected to a working verb.
When a relative pronoun is the object of a preposition ("IN which"), that relative pronoun is
not the
subject of a clause, so the
which in the construction
in which does not need a verb.
In assessing sentences that contain a relative pronoun that is
not the object (complement) of a preposition, I have said that when readers see a relative pronoun, they should start looking for two full-fledged verbs: one for the subject, and one for the relative pronoun.
This page contains a short list of examples in which [pun intended] the relative pronoun is the object of a preposition and thus is not connected to a working verb:
Click here to see the list.What I've written sounds abstract.
Let's use some examples.
In these examples, the
relative pronoun needs
its own working verb, and that verb is different from the
main verb for the
main subject:
1) The
dog,
which stole and
ate the pizza,
skulked around looking guilty.
2) The
dog that stole and
ate the pizza
hid under the bed. [Implying that there is more than one dog.]
3) The
man who owned the pizza-thieving dog
laughed when the dog crawled under the bed.
In these examples, the
relative pronoun does NOT need its own working verb because the relative pronoun is the object of a preposition. Notice that you cannot find a verb that matches the relative pronoun.
(And please, see the short grammar page I've linked to above - it lists this kind of example):
1)
The Florida retiree owns a club to which I hope never to belong. 2)
The poise with which she carries herself intimidates insecure people.3)
The temple in which members worshipped loomed large in the midst of the city.This phrasing may sound strange to most people, native speakers included, but the phrasing is part of sophisticated writing.
Look carefully as you read an article in a high end newspaper or journal.
You will see such phrasing.
I hope that answer helps.