Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 01:02 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 01:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
akhileshgupta05
Joined: 01 May 2011
Last visit: 26 Mar 2012
Posts: 348
Own Kudos:
377
 [49]
Given Kudos: 26
Status:750+ or Burst !
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.5
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V35
Posts: 348
Kudos: 377
 [49]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
41
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
umg
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 18 Jun 2016
Last visit: 26 Jun 2020
Posts: 214
Own Kudos:
680
 [11]
Given Kudos: 111
Location: United States (NY)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 4
WE:General Management (Other)
Products:
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 214
Kudos: 680
 [11]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
15,571
 [5]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,571
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
sleepynut
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Last visit: 18 Jul 2017
Posts: 162
Own Kudos:
93
 [3]
Given Kudos: 905
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: Q167 V147
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: Q167 V147
Posts: 162
Kudos: 93
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi experts,
IMHO,the 2nd bf is not a main conclusion.
The main conclusion should be that the less emphasis should be placed on mathematical principles."so that" is used to explain further for anything mentioned before.Hence,that subordinate clause should be a premise of this argument.

What did I miss in this question?
Thanks
User avatar
TheMechanic
Joined: 19 Oct 2012
Last visit: 05 Jul 2018
Posts: 207
Own Kudos:
595
 [2]
Given Kudos: 103
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.81
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
longranger25
More and more computer programs that provide solutions to mathematical problems in engineering are being produced, and it is thus increasingly unnecessary for practicing engineers to have a thorough understanding of fundamental mathematical principles. Consequently, in training engineers who will work in industry, less emphasis should be placed on mathematical principles, so that space in the engineering curriculum will be available for other important subjects.


The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is the second-premise that the argument includes; the second is the conclusion that could be drawn from this passage.
(B) The first is the fact that is necessary for this argument; the second is the conclusion that must be drawn from this passage.
(C) The first is the part of premise that the argument includes; the second is the inference that could be drawn from this passage.
(D) The first is the part of evidence that supports this argument; the second is the inference that could be drawn from this passage.
(E) The first is the first conclusion in this argument; the second is the second conclusion in this argument.


I used POE to get through this.

On reading the 2nd bold faced, the fact that there will be space in the engineering curriculum for other important subjetcs is not an implication. I can't imply this based on the information given. Therefore the 2nd boldface purely is the opinion of the author and is serving as a conclusion of the argument.

If 2nd boldface is not an implication, then,

Option A) the second is the conclusion that could be drawn from this passage. that could be drawn implies an inference that's possible based on the information. It's out.
Option B) the second is the conclusion that must be drawn from this passage. Again an inference drawn based on the information given.
Option C) Out.
Option D) Out.
Option E) Remains.

I hope this helps.
User avatar
Aviral1995
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2019
Last visit: 23 May 2022
Posts: 228
Own Kudos:
69
 [1]
Given Kudos: 309
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V36
GPA: 3.85
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V36
Posts: 228
Kudos: 69
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Experts VeritasKarishma jennpt
I think the conclusion here is Consequently, in training engineers who will work in industry, less emphasis should be placed on mathematical principles
First boldface is supporting the first line of the passage and second supports the conclusion cited above.
Please explain the answer
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,439
Own Kudos:
79,390
 [2]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,439
Kudos: 79,390
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
akhileshgupta05
More and more computer programs that provide solutions to mathematical problems in engineering are being produced, and it is thus increasingly unnecessary for practicing engineers to have a thorough understanding of fundamental mathematical principles. Consequently, in training engineers who will work in industry, less emphasis should be placed on mathematical principles, so that space in the engineering curriculum will be available for other important subjects.

The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is the second-premise that the argument includes; the second is the conclusion that could be drawn from this passage.
(B) The first is the fact that is necessary for this argument; the second is the conclusion that must be drawn from this passage.
(C) The first is the part of premise that the argument includes; the second is the inference that could be drawn from this passage.
(D) The first is the part of evidence that supports this argument; the second is the inference that could be drawn from this passage.
(E) The first is the first conclusion in this argument; the second is the second conclusion in this argument.

Keep it simple - What is the conclusion here? Why did the author write this argument? What did he want to tell you in 1 line? What is THE POINT he is trying to make?

Conclusion - Place less emphasis on Math to leave more space for other imp subjects.

How does he support it?

By telling you this:

- More and more computer programs that provide solutions to mathematical problems in engineering are being produced.

Then he draws an intermediate conclusion - it is thus increasingly unnecessary for practicing engineers to have a thorough understanding of fundamental mathematical principles.

Based on this, he puts forward his point - place less emphasis on Math to leave more space for other imp subjects.

So the first BF is an intermediate conclusion and the second BF is the main conclusion (or as the option uses the terms, first conclusion and second conclusion)
User avatar
Monishka
Joined: 29 Apr 2025
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The only reason why I didn't choose option E was that there is only one conclusion in any argument. The answer choice mentioned conclusions one and two, instead of the intermediate and main conclusions. Is my understanding wrong, or can we expect this in GMAT FE as well?
umg
akhileshgupta05
More and more computer programs that provide solutions to mathematical problems in engineering are being produced, and it is thus increasingly unnecessary for practicing engineers to have a thorough understanding of fundamental mathematical principles. Consequently, in training engineers who will work in industry, less emphasis should be placed on mathematical principles, so that space in the engineering curriculum will be available for other important subjects.

The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is the second-premise that the argument includes; the second is the conclusion that could be drawn from this passage.
(B) The first is the fact that is necessary for this argument; the second is the conclusion that must be drawn from this passage.
(C) The first is the part of premise that the argument includes; the second is the inference that could be drawn from this passage.
(D) The first is the part of evidence that supports this argument; the second is the inference that could be drawn from this passage.
(E) The first is the first conclusion in this argument; the second is the second conclusion in this argument.
This isn't really a good question because the Correct Answer is not worded as GMAT would. We always have 1 Main Conclusion in an argument even if the argument has 2 conclusions and test makers clearly mention that in the answer options if they Bold-en both the conclusions.

Let's Analyze 1st Boldface.
More and more computer programs that provide solutions to mathematical problems in engineering are being produced, and it is thus increasingly unnecessary for practicing engineers to have a thorough understanding of fundamental mathematical principles.
Thus - is a Conclusion Marker => 1st Boldface has a Conclusion.

Now, the 2nd BF
Consequently, in training engineers who will work in industry, less emphasis should be placed on mathematical principles, so that space in the engineering curriculum will be available for other important subjects.
Consequently - so that -> Another Conclusion Markers.=> We have 2 Conclusions in the Argument

Here, we have 2 conclusions and First conclusion (it is thus increasingly unnecessary for practicing engineers to have a thorough understanding of fundamental mathematical principles) is working as a premise for the main conclusion (in training engineers who will work in industry, less emphasis should be placed on mathematical principles, so that space in the engineering curriculum will be available for other important subjects).

You can check that by substituting "Therefore" between both the lines.

1. In training engineers who will work in industry, less emphasis should be placed on mathematical principles, so that space in the engineering curriculum will be available for other important subjects therefore, it is thus increasingly unnecessary for practicing engineers to have a thorough understanding of fundamental mathematical principles.
Wrong. Cause Effect Relationship is reversed.


2. It is thus increasingly unnecessary for practicing engineers to have a thorough understanding of fundamental mathematical principles therefore, in training engineers who will work in industry, less emphasis should be placed on mathematical principles, so that space in the engineering curriculum will be available for other important subjects.
Makes perfect sense; therefore, Last Statement is the Main Conclusion.


So essentially, 1st Bold face is acting as a Premise for the 2nd Bold Face. Now, lets analyze the options.

(A) The first is the second-premise that the argument includes; the second is the conclusion that could be drawn from this passage. First is the part of 1st Premise
(B) The first is the fact that is necessary for this argument; the second is the conclusion that must be drawn from this passage. Strong words. Argument would hold true even without the necessities and compulsion (must be).
(C) The first is the part of premise that the argument includes; the second is the inference that could be drawn from this passage. Second is Not the Inference. It is the Conclusion.
(D) The first is the part of evidence that supports this argument; the second is the inference that could be drawn from this passage. Second is Not the Inference. It is the Conclusion.
(E) The first is the first conclusion in this argument; the second is the second conclusion in this argument. These are not the 1st and 2nd Conclusion in the argument. These are the Sub-ordinate and Main conclusions or Premise and Main conclusions. However, this is the only option close to what we have analyzed above. Hence, this is the Correct Option.


Difference Between Inference and Conclusion

Inference is not explicitly mentioned in the argument while the conclusion is.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts