The correct answer is option (A).
Understanding the passage:There are two ways to solve this. One is algebraic (using variables) but that may be too complex in a timed environment. The easier way is to assume values.
My approachNow, when we assume values, we need to be careful to cover all possible scenarios.
When we assume values, we need to cover
1. A lower extreme set
2. A typical mid range set
3. A higher extreme set
A true inference should hold true across all 3 sets of assumed values.
For this problem, let us assume -
Total Production in 1983 = 100; then
Ashtray Production = 40
Umbrella Stand Production = 60
Given increase in ashtray production (A) > increase in umbrella stand production (U)
i.e. A > U
3 extremes:
1) A just > U say A =2, U = 1 (Bare minimum possible)
Now Ashtray Production (1993) = 40+ 2 = 42
US Production = 60+1 = 61
What can we infer:
1. Ashtray production < Umbrella Stand Production
2. % Contribution of Ashtray Production = (42) / (42+61) = 40.7% . Greater than the same metric in 1983 (40%)
2) A > U say A = 30, U = 20
Now Ashtray Production (1993) = 40+ 30 = 70
US Production = 60+20 = 80
What can we infer:
1. Ashtray production < Umbrella Stand Production
2. % Contribution of Ashtray Production = (70) / (70+80) = 47% . Greater than the same metric in 1983 (40%)
3) A >>> U say A = 90, U = 10
Now Ashtray Production (1993) = 40+ 90 = 130
US Production = 60+10 = 70
What can we infer:
1.
Ashtray production > Umbrella Stand Production (notice this has changed)
2. % Contribution of Ashtray Production = (130) / (130+70) = 65% . Greater than the same metric in 1983 (40%)
Now, let us look at the answer choices:
A. In 1993, the percentage of Consolidated Metal's production devoted to ashtrays was greater than that in 1983.Valid inference (our inference 2). We have seen above that whatever the assumed values, this holds true.
B. In 1993, Consolidated Metals produced fewer ashtrays than umbrella stands.Not valid in our 3rd set of assumed values (higher extreme). Hence, we cannot infer this.
C. In 1993, ashtrays were more cost-efficient to produce than they were in 1983Irrelevant. The passage does not talk about this entity (cost efficiency). Hence, we can't make any inference about this.
D. The production of umbrella stands required more labor in 1993 than did ashtrays in 1983.Irrelevant. The passage does not talk about this entity (labour). Hence, we can't make any inference about this.
E. In 1993, Consolidated Metals produced more ashtrays than umbrella stands.Not valid in our 1st and 2nd set of assumed values. Hence, we cannot infer this.
Hope this helps.
Cheers!