Famous personalities found guilty of many types of crimes in well-publicized trials are increasingly sentenced to the performance of community service, though unknown defendants convicted of similar crimes almost always serve prison sentences. However, the principle of equality before the law rules out using fame and publicity as relevant considerations in the sentencing of convicted criminals.
Conclusion is Equality of law should apply to all regardless of their stature but it doesnt happen.The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following conclusions?
A. The principle of equality before the law is rigorously applied in only a few types of criminal trials. -
Types of criminal trials can mean classification on lot more things than just the stature[fame or publicity] of the person. B. The number of convicted celebrities sentenced to community service should equal the number of convicted unknown defendants sentenced to community service. -
This doesnt mean that we should have equal number of celebrities and unknown defendants serving community service.C. The principle of equality before the law can properly be overridden by other principles in some cases. -
Other principles is very vague and can mean a lot of things.D. The sentencing of celebrities to community service instead of prison constitutes a violation of the principle of equality before the law in many cases. -
Although i was sceptic of this choice because of many cases as we are not sure of the number here but, still it is the best conclusion out there.E. The principle of equality before the law does not allow for leniency in sentencing -
this is not true as per the stimuli, it can account for leneincy just not based on the stature