[quote="EMPOWERgmatMax"]
CR INFERENCE SERIES: Question 3) Restless Leg Syndrome Restless legs syndrome also known as Willis-Ekbom disease is characterized by an irresistible urge to move one’s legs, particularly during sleep. Several widely consumed pharmaceutical agents have been shown to reduce symptoms of restless leg syndrome, but those same agents are also associated with a range of side-effects, many of which are quite common, and some can be quite serious. While offsetting treatments can reduce or even eliminate the side effects associated with pharmaceutical agents designed to treat restless leg syndrome[/color],
some form of side effect is unlikely to be prevented.
Text in red: facts/premises
Text in green: conclusion
This argument concludes that some sort of side effects are unlikely (mild and probability word) to be eliminated. The argument states that the medicine to counteract the effects of restless leg syndrome causes side effects that can be serious sometimes. To negate the negative side effects, certain offsetting treatments are used. These offsetting treatments can reduce the severity of even eliminate the side effects of restless leg syndrome medications but some form of side effects still exist.
Points to note here:
1. The argument does not use extreme language in the premises and thus we will be able to eliminate answer choices that use extreme language (all, must, should etc)
2. The argument mentions that even after taking the medications for restless leg syndrome and taking the offsetting medications, it is still likely to see some side effects, we can infer that some side effects still are likely to exist. This is correctly captured by choice C.
3. The argument does not mention any stats or numbers to back up his claim and thus options with extreme number choices (all , none etc) will most likely be incorrect.
The information above most strongly supports which one of the following?
Ⓐ All restless leg syndrome patients taking a pharmaceutical agent should also take an offsetting treatment.
Incorrect. Extreme choice due to 'all'. It is a might be true choice and not a must be true answer. What if the side effects of the RLS medications are serious only for a certain percentage (<100%)? This choice will be weakened in this case. The argument does not provide any facts or numbers to prove this choice.Ⓑ Side effects suffered by a restless leg syndrome patient can be attributed to a failure to also take an offsetting treatment.
Incorrect. The argument does not mention anything about the causes of the side effects in patients suffering from RLS.
Ⓒ At least some restless leg syndrome patients suffer from side effects as a result of a pharmaceutical agent.
Correct as per the pre thinking above. This is a must be true option as we have been told that there are certain side effects that can be completely removed by the offsetting treatments.
Ⓓ Restless leg syndrome patients who want to avoid side effects from a pharmaceutical agent should take an offsetting treatment.
Incorrect. This is a might be true option as it might be that the offsetting treatments are only for severe are effects
The argument provides no justification for the recommendation mentioned in this option.
Ⓔ Doctors and specialists should refrain from prescribing a pharmaceutical agent to treat restless leg syndrome if that patient could contract a side effect as a result.
Incorrect. Extreme option. The argument says that some of the side effects can be serious and not all of them are. RLS might become a bigger problem if doctors completely stop prescribing pharmaceutical agent to RLS patients.