Pundit: It is good to have national leaders voted out of office after a few years. The reason is that reforms are generally undertaken early in a new government. If leaders do not act quickly to solve a problem and it becomes an issue later, then they must either deny that there is a problem or deny that anything could have been done about it; otherwise, they will have to admit responsibility for the persistence of the problem.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the pundit's argument?
(A) If national leaders who fail to solve problems are voted out of office after a few years, new leaders will be more motivated to solve problems. {
WRONG - The main conclusion is not about the motivation of the new leaders}
(B) National leaders who stay in power too long tend to deny responsibility for problems that they could have dealt with earlier. {
WRONG -even though this choice states a correct fact, it does not capture the main point of the argument. This choice is a supporting fact for the main conclusion of the argument.}
(C) National leaders are most likely to undertake reforms early in a new government. {
WRONG - this is a prediction and not the main conclusion}
(D) National leaders who immediately respond to problems upon taking office should be given enough time to succeed at solving them. {
WRONG - this is outside information and out of scope}
(E) National leaders should be removed from office every few years by the voting in of new leaders. {
CORRECT - the main conclusion is the following: "It is good to have national leaders voted out of office after a few years.". This choice paraphrases this statement}