Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
09 May 2018, 02:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
55%
(hard)
Question Stats:
62% (01:38) correct
38%
(01:51)
wrong
based on 368
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Companies can attract a great number of new customers by discounting prices on their products. However, discounted prices usually lead to lower profit margins on sales. Therefore, companies that already have low profit margins and cannot decrease their prices any further will not be able to attract a great number of new customers.
The argument above is flawed because it fails to consider that
A. It is possible to attract some new customers without discounting prices.
B. It is possible for companies to attract a great number of new customers without significantly discounting prices on their products.
C. More customers do not necessarily mean greater profits for the company.
D. A great many new customers may be attracted by means other than price reduction.
E. Many companies have significantly increased their profits without discounting prices on their products.
The argument above is flawed because it fails to consider that
A. It is possible to attract some new customers without discounting prices.
B. It is possible for companies to attract a great number of new customers without significantly discounting prices on their products.
C. More customers do not necessarily mean greater profits for the company.
D. A great many new customers may be attracted by means other than price reduction.
E. Many companies have significantly increased their profits without discounting prices on their products.
09 May 2018, 02:31
Kudos
Bookmarks
Detail answer - https://www.mbacrystalball.com/blog/201 ... ufficient/
Choice A. It is possible to attract some new customers without discounting prices. The word some in this statement is not strong enough: the argument is concerned with attracting a great number of new customers, which is not the same as some customers. Note that the precision in word usage is sometimes a pitfall in these questions. Every detail counts!
Choice B. It is possible for companies to attract a great number of new customers without significantly discounting prices on their products. The argument above never said anything about discounting prices significantly. It was hinged on the premise that companies unable to reduce their prices by any margin, significant or otherwise, would be unable to attract customers. Therefore adding the word ‘significantly’ does not undermine the statement’s avowal of the necessity of price reduction at any rate for increasing business. This choice fails to address the major flaw in the argument.
Choice C. More customers do not necessarily mean greater profits for the company. The argument is concerned with means of increasing the number of new customers. Whether more customers always mean greater profits is not important. Again, this choice fails to address the major flaw in the argument.
Choice D. A great many new customers may be attracted by means other than price reduction. As we have already determined, the flaw is that the argument assumes that price reduction is the only means of attracting a great number of new customers. Here we correctly reinstate the condition of ‘price reduction’ as sufficient rather than a necessary condition. Furthermore, this statement directly addresses the flaw using proportional language. This is the correct answer.
Choice E. Many companies have significantly increased their profits without discounting prices on their products. The argument is concerned with attracting new customers, not with increasing profits. The fact that some companies may have increased their profits without reducing prices does not necessarily mean that their profits increased due to a greater number of new customers.
Choice D is the correct answer.
Choice A. It is possible to attract some new customers without discounting prices. The word some in this statement is not strong enough: the argument is concerned with attracting a great number of new customers, which is not the same as some customers. Note that the precision in word usage is sometimes a pitfall in these questions. Every detail counts!
Choice B. It is possible for companies to attract a great number of new customers without significantly discounting prices on their products. The argument above never said anything about discounting prices significantly. It was hinged on the premise that companies unable to reduce their prices by any margin, significant or otherwise, would be unable to attract customers. Therefore adding the word ‘significantly’ does not undermine the statement’s avowal of the necessity of price reduction at any rate for increasing business. This choice fails to address the major flaw in the argument.
Choice C. More customers do not necessarily mean greater profits for the company. The argument is concerned with means of increasing the number of new customers. Whether more customers always mean greater profits is not important. Again, this choice fails to address the major flaw in the argument.
Choice D. A great many new customers may be attracted by means other than price reduction. As we have already determined, the flaw is that the argument assumes that price reduction is the only means of attracting a great number of new customers. Here we correctly reinstate the condition of ‘price reduction’ as sufficient rather than a necessary condition. Furthermore, this statement directly addresses the flaw using proportional language. This is the correct answer.
Choice E. Many companies have significantly increased their profits without discounting prices on their products. The argument is concerned with attracting new customers, not with increasing profits. The fact that some companies may have increased their profits without reducing prices does not necessarily mean that their profits increased due to a greater number of new customers.
Choice D is the correct answer.
31 May 2018, 02:23
Kudos
Bookmarks
aragonn
My Line of reasoning:-
customer may be attracted to items other than discount ,if item has some other unique feature than similar or some other kind of items
Option D ,tells us the same
Hence best option than others...
Ans D
