Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 04:38 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 04:38
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
LeoGT
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
362
 [9]
Given Kudos: 51
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.8
WE:Supply Chain Management (Retail: E-commerce)
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
Posts: 53
Kudos: 362
 [9]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Akash720
Joined: 17 Jan 2017
Last visit: 05 Jun 2020
Posts: 216
Own Kudos:
273
 [2]
Given Kudos: 144
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 216
Kudos: 273
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
LeoGT
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
362
 [1]
Given Kudos: 51
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.8
WE:Supply Chain Management (Retail: E-commerce)
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
Posts: 53
Kudos: 362
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Akash720
Joined: 17 Jan 2017
Last visit: 05 Jun 2020
Posts: 216
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 144
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 216
Kudos: 273
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
LeoGT


I'm afraid answer B cannot explain the discrepancy.
Key point of the argument is:
- 1995 found combat in painting. Combat is not used until 1804.
Discrepancy: Evidence suggests that painting is produced after 1804.
But 2009 analysis suggest the painting is produced before 1804.
Assumption of 1905 is combat must be use at the time the painting is created.

B says techique in 2009 can detect smaller amount. Both can detect combalt.

Hi Leo,

As per my understanding, the answer should resolve the discrepancy between two statements i.e.,
1) The 1955 analysis suggested that the painting was deemed to have been produced sometime after 1804
2) The 2009 analysis suggested that the painting might have been produced before 1804

Option B here, suggests that 2009 analysis used sophisticated scientific equipment that can detect much smaller amounts of cobalt than could the equipment used for the 1955 analysis. What we can assume from this statement is, the equipment of 1955 analysis was not good enough to detect smaller amounts of cobalt which would have given more information about the painting, but the equipment of 2009 analysis is sophisticated, can detect much smaller amounts of cobalt which provides more information about the painting. The additional information can be an evidence of the painting produced before 1804.

This is my understanding. An expert comment can clear the doubt probably
User avatar
LeoGT
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
362
 [1]
Given Kudos: 51
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.8
WE:Supply Chain Management (Retail: E-commerce)
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
Posts: 53
Kudos: 362
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Akash720
LeoGT


I'm afraid answer B cannot explain the discrepancy.
Key point of the argument is:
- 1995 found combat in painting. Combat is not used until 1804.
Discrepancy: Evidence suggests that painting is produced after 1804.
But 2009 analysis suggest the painting is produced before 1804.
Assumption of 1905 is combat must be use at the time the painting is created.

B says techique in 2009 can detect smaller amount. Both can detect combalt.

Hi Leo,

As per my understanding, the answer should resolve the discrepancy between two statements i.e.,
1) The 1955 analysis suggested that the painting was deemed to have been produced sometime after 1804
2) The 2009 analysis suggested that the painting might have been produced before 1804

Option B here, suggests that 2009 analysis used sophisticated scientific equipment that can detect much smaller amounts of cobalt than could the equipment used for the 1955 analysis. What we can assume from this statement is, the equipment of 1955 analysis was not good enough to detect smaller amounts of cobalt which would have given more information about the painting, but the equipment of 2009 analysis is sophisticated, can detect much smaller amounts of cobalt which provides more information about the painting. The additional information can be an evidence of the painting produced before 1804.

This is my understanding. An expert comment can clear the doubt probably


Hi Akash720
Thanks for sharing your opinion. However, there is too many gaps in your reasoning. Here it is:
"Option B here, suggests that 2009 analysis used sophisticated scientific equipment that can detect much smaller amounts of cobalt than could the equipment used for the 1955 analysis. What we can assume from this statement is, the equipment of 1955 analysis was not good enough to detect smaller amounts of cobalt which would have given more information about the painting, but the equipment of 2009 analysis is sophisticated, can detect much smaller amounts of cobalt which provides more information about the painting. The additional information can be an evidence of the painting produced before 1804"

The red part is just your assumption. It cannot solve problem.
Analogy:
My ESR GMAT report includes a news part which just appear 01/07/2018.
Conclution: I must take the exam after 01/07/2018
Reasoning in the question same here. I took before 01/07/2018 and the new part is added by GMAC after 01/07/2018.
User avatar
LeoGT
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
362
 [1]
Given Kudos: 51
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.8
WE:Supply Chain Management (Retail: E-commerce)
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
Posts: 53
Kudos: 362
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Akash720
LeoGT


I'm afraid answer B cannot explain the discrepancy.
Key point of the argument is:
- 1995 found combat in painting. Combat is not used until 1804.
Discrepancy: Evidence suggests that painting is produced after 1804.
But 2009 analysis suggest the painting is produced before 1804.
Assumption of 1905 is combat must be use at the time the painting is created.

B says techique in 2009 can detect smaller amount. Both can detect combalt.

Hi Leo,

As per my understanding, the answer should resolve the discrepancy between two statements i.e.,
1) The 1955 analysis suggested that the painting was deemed to have been produced sometime after 1804
2) The 2009 analysis suggested that the painting might have been produced before 1804

Option B here, suggests that 2009 analysis used sophisticated scientific equipment that can detect much smaller amounts of cobalt than could the equipment used for the 1955 analysis. What we can assume from this statement is, the equipment of 1955 analysis was not good enough to detect smaller amounts of cobalt which would have given more information about the painting, but the equipment of 2009 analysis is sophisticated, can detect much smaller amounts of cobalt which provides more information about the painting. The additional information can be an evidence of the painting produced before 1804.

This is my understanding. An expert comment can clear the doubt probably

Even If your assumption is right, it cannot clear the irony. I still can say i do not care your new technique. I found combat, and combat is used after 1804. So i conclude the painting is produced after 1804.

Your reasoning is same as:
Teacher say that my gmat is low because i'm lazzy.
I say: but I leart from gmat club.
Here, i dont attact the argument i'm lazzy. Same as your reasoning.
User avatar
Akash720
Joined: 17 Jan 2017
Last visit: 05 Jun 2020
Posts: 216
Own Kudos:
273
 [1]
Given Kudos: 144
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 216
Kudos: 273
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
LeoGT


Your reasoning is same as:
Teacher say that my gmat is low because i'm lazzy.
I say: but I leart from gmat club.
Here, i dont attact the argument i'm lazzy. Same as your reasoning.

Looks like I misunderstood option A. Now when I read the options again considering B is wrong, I get that Option A is the right answer.

Option A states that cobalt was located only in the topmost paint layer. This clears our discrepancy as this proves Cobalt is just a layer on the painting hinting that painting could have been created way before and it doesn't matter from when people started using cobalt. Hence falsifying first conclusion.
User avatar
abhishekdadarwal2009
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Last visit: 07 Dec 2022
Posts: 524
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
Posts: 524
Kudos: 487
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A 1955 analysis of paint samples from an Italian painting found evidence of cobalt, suggesting the use of cobalt blue, a pigment not used in Europe before 1804. The painting was thus deemed to have been produced sometime after 1804. A 2009 analysis also found cobalt, but that analysis suggested that the painting might have been produced before 1804.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy in the information above?

(A) The 2009 analysis revealed that cobalt was located only in the topmost paint layer, which was possibly applied to conceal damage to original paint layers.Correct explaination Baba.

(B) The 2009 analysis used sophisticated scientific equipment that can detect much smaller amounts of cobalt than could the equipment used for the 1955 analysis.the quantity is irrelevant.

(C) The 2009 analysis took more samples from the painting than the 1955 analysis did, though those samples were smaller.
the question is not abt accuracy of the tests,but is about the use of cobalt blue.both T1 and T2 prove it to be there.

(D) Many experts, based on the style and the subject matter of the painting, have dated the painting to the 1700s.

out of scope Baba

(E) New information that came to light in the 1990s suggested that cobalt blue was used only rarely in Italy in the years immediately following 1804.after the time window.so out of scope.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,424
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,424
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts