Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 23:21 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 23:21
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
RobVanDam
Joined: 26 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Feb 2020
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
144
 [7]
Given Kudos: 186
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 570 Q48 V20
GMAT 2: 520 Q49 V12
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V35
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 44
Kudos: 144
 [7]
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
RobVanDam
Joined: 26 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Feb 2020
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 186
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 570 Q48 V20
GMAT 2: 520 Q49 V12
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V35
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
mitrakaushi
Joined: 03 Apr 2017
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
85
 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Posts: 42
Kudos: 85
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
RobVanDam
Joined: 26 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Feb 2020
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 186
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 570 Q48 V20
GMAT 2: 520 Q49 V12
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V35
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mitrakaushi
I felt that the whole question did not make any sense because of the last statement which stated that the river water was more polluted than the treated water. What is the conclusion here. If the conclusion is that the water was good after treatment then there is no grounds to oppose that. The last sentence is just additional info with no value.

OA says

The argument introduces a plan to turn the city's waste water into sufficiently clean water before it empties into the river. The first bolded phrase describes how a local city councilwoman…publicly drank a glass of treated water from the plant in order to allay fears about the new water treatment plant’s functionality. The second bolded phrase states that unfortunately, the river had been badly polluted for decades, calling the plant’s efficacy in treating the waste water into question. Evaluate the answer choices, looking for one that matches the reasoning in the argument.

But, unfortunately introduces a contrast i feel.
User avatar
TaN1213
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Last visit: 12 Mar 2019
Posts: 341
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 644
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 341
Kudos: 925
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pun91
To allay fears that the new water treatment plant's functionality will be inadequate to turn the city's waste water into sufficiently clean water before it empties into the river, a local city councilwoman held a grand opening where she publicly drank a glass of treated water from the plant. The crowds and members of the media were impressed with her confidence, and the concern blew over. The scientists at the plant later confided that the treated water was indeed cleaner than the river water, but unfortunately, the river had been badly polluted for decades.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

1. The first describes evidence that had been taken in favor of a conclusion; the second gives evidence to question that support.
2. The first describes evidence that had been taken in favor of a conclusion; the second is a conclusion that is in opposition to that evidence.
3. The first gives evidence in support of the argument's conclusion; the second is the conclusion.
4. The first describes a situation that the argument seeks to explain; the second is the explanation of the situation.
5. The first describes a situation that the argument seeks to explain; the second gives evidence to support the explanation of the situation.

Can somebody please help me by explaining how to find the conclusion in this argument? :hurt:
Second part of the OA i.e. option A is definitely not making any sense with respect to the argument. How is the 2nd bold part questioning the 1st bold part?

In my opinion this is not a quality question.
avatar
ColumbiaEMBA
Joined: 29 Sep 2017
Last visit: 24 Mar 2019
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Location: United States
Products:
Posts: 88
Kudos: 61
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Poor question.

Comparing to real GMAT questions, the answer should be something along the likes of:

The first statement expresses a fact (or support for the conclusion), the second statement is the conclusion with an added explanation for something that has nothing to do with the first statement.

If you remove everything after "water,", then C is the best choice, though the first part of C isn't exactly true.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,424
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,424
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
504 posts
358 posts