MANI530
Can anyone explain why the answer cannot be Option A
The paradox is that, ordinarily, when the main bridge is closed because of a traffic incident, the other two bridges become congested, but when the main bridge was closed for maintenance, the other two bridges did not become congested.
So, to resolve this paradox, we need to show why the result of the closure for maintenance was DIFFERENT from the results of closures because of traffic incidents.
Here's choice (A).
A. There are bridges just outside of Argentium city limits that motorists traveling to destinations within Argentium can use to cross the river without necessarily making long detours.Does choice (A) explain why the results of the closure for maintenance were different from the results of the other closures? No, because those bridges just outside of Argentium city limits are always there. So, if the presence of those bridges doesn't cause the smaller bridges to remain uncongested when the main bridge is closed because of a traffic incident, the presence of those bridges probably wouldn't explain why the main bridge remained uncongested during the maintenance period.
Choice (B), on the other hand explains the difference, because people don't normally have advance notice of traffic incidents but would probably have been aware that main bridge was closed for maintenance. So, (B) shows how a closure for maintenance is different from a closure because of a traffic incident.