AbhishekP220108
Please provide the explanation along with what is the conclusion and how it is identified
Hello AbhishekP220108
To identify conclusion, concentrate on certain words often (not always) signal that a conclusion is coming:
- Therefore
- Thus
- Hence
- So
- Consequently
- As a result
- It follows that
Here the conclusion is: That price increase will stimulate domestic car sales.
The argument assumes:Higher price of imported cars means some customers switch to domestic cars. This switch is not stated explicitly in the argument, so it’s an assumption.
Higher taxes on imports → higher prices for imports → more domestic sales only if people who would have bought imports now choose domestic cars instead.
Evaluate options(A): Opposite: eople consider price minor → if price minor, then raising import price shouldn’t matter much. This would weaken, not support, the argument. Out.
(B): If price of imports increases, some consumers who would have bought imports will buy domestic cars. Exactly the missing premise. This connects price increase to switch in demand.
(C): Foreign manufacturers stop exporting. Not necessary for the argument to work. Too extreme. Argument only needs substitution from some buyers, not complete withdrawal.
(D): Only possible use of increased revenues is stimulus for growth — irrelevant. Argument is about sales volume, not what manufacturers do with revenue.
(E): Revenue transfer equality between domestic and foreign — irrelevant to sales stimulation claim.
Answer: B