One out of four heart surgery patients at St.Vincent's dies from complications during surgery. Only one out of six heart surgery patients at St.Mary's dies from complications during surgery. If you need heart surgery, make sure you go to St.Mary's, not St.Vincent's.
Which of the following, if true, is the best reason to reject this argument?-
WEAKENLet's jot down the points:
Premise: 1/4 HS die @V
Premise: 1/6 HS die @M
Conclusion: For HS, M is best not V
We need to weaken the argument to state M is not always/sometimes better than M, and since the passage involves ratios(percentage), please refer to this reasoning
https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-percentage-of-global-tourists-who-visit-kokua-has-increased-by-fiv-303899.html#p2347221 because statistics can be very deceiving.
A. St.Vincent's specializes in heart surgery for elderly and high-risk patients.
CORRECT It gives a reason as to why Vincent has high death rate from complications during surgery. It would have a higher rate of mortality among its patients. Also, negation technique works for this sentence.
B. St.Mary's surgical equipment is more up to date than St.Vincent's.
INCORRECT. This sentence strengthens the argument.
C. St.Vincent's has the most renowned heart surgeon in the country on its staff.
INCORRECT. Contender but does nothing to contradict the statistics.
D. St.Vincent's offers flexible payment options for balances not covered by insurance.
INCORRECT. How does payment option even matter in this argument. Irrelevant.
E. Two doctors who used to work at St.Mary's now work at St.Vincent's.
INCORRECT. Incomplete information. If the reason to change the hospital was given, we would have considered it.