A scientific theory is a good theory if it satisfies two requirements: It must accurately describe a large class of observations in terms of a model that is simple enough to contain only a few elements, and it must make definite predictions about the results of future observations. For example, Aristotle’s cosmological theory, which claimed that everything was made out of four elements—earth, air, fire, and water—satisfied the first requirement, but it did not make any definite prediction. Thus, Aristotle’s cosmological theory was not a good theory.
If all the statements in the passage are true, each of the following must also be true EXCEPT:
(A)
Prediction about the results of future observations
must be made by any good scientific theory. - WRONG. It's a necessity.
(B) Observation of physical phenomena was not a major concern in Aristotle’s cosmological theory. - CORRECT. Had that been the case the theory would have been good.
(C) Four elements can be the
basis of a scientific model that is simple enough to meet the simplicity criterion of a good theory. - WORNG. Four elements is fine but what about the results which is missing, thus making it not a good theory.
(D) A scientific model that
contains many elements is not a good theory. - WRONG. Many elements is a no-no for a good theory as already mentioned in the passage.
(E) Aristotle’s cosmological theory described a large class of observations
in terms of only four elements. - WRONG. Yes, that's what we can see in the passage.
Answer B.