Kim: In northern Europe during the eighteenth century a change of attitude occurred that found expression both in the adoption of less solemn and elaborate death rites by the population at large and in a more optimistic view of the human condition as articulated by philosophers. This change can be explained as the result of a dramatic increase in life expectancy that occurred in northern Europe early in the eighteenth century.
Lee: Your explanation seems unlikely, because it could not be correct unless the people of the time were aware that their life expectancy had increased.
Which one of the following most accurately describes Lee’s criticism of Kim’s explanation?
(A)
It refers to sources of additional data that cannot easily be reconciled with the facts.
(Lee's statement is drawing out a fact itself, hence it's supposedly wrong)
(B)
It offers an alternative explanation that is equally supported by the evidence Kim cites.
(Kim and Lee statements are contradicting each other)
(C) It cites an analogous case in which Kim’s explanation clearly cannot hold. ( drawing out Contradicting character with the Kim statement)
(D)
It suggests that Kim’s explanation depends on a questionable assumption.
(argument is not negative)
(E)
It points out that Kim’s explanation is based on two hypotheses that contradict each other.
(Not evident)
Posted from my mobile device