One of the advantages of
Bacillus thuringiensls (B.t.) toxins over chemical insecticides results from their specificity for pest insects. The toxins have no known detrimental effects on mammals or birds. In addition, the limited range of activity of the toxins toward insects means that often a particular toxin will kill pest species but not affect insets that prey upon the species. This advantage makes B.t. toxins preferable to chemical insecticides for use as components of insect pest management programs.
Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?
(A) Chemical insecticides
cause harm to a greater number of insect species than do B.t. toxins. - WRONG. Supports the passage rather.
(B) No particular B.t. toxin is effective against
all insects. - WRONG. Passage particularly points out about specific species so this choice unnecessarily brings all insects into consideration.
(C) B.t. toxins do not harm
weeds that do damage to farm crops. - WRONG. Weed is out of scope of the passage hence irrelevant.
(D)
Insects build up resistance more readily to B.t. toxins than to chemical insecticides. - CORRECT. A resistant insect nullify the impact BT has over it the claim made in the passage go weak.
(E) Birds and rodents often
do greater damage to farm crops than do insects. - WRONG. Yes, they might be doing but that is not necessary for the argument to hold or fall apart. So, this basically has no impact and it because conclusion is not about who damages crop more but about BT toxins being more preferable.
Answer D.