A: Some sports fans do not appreciate how short stature can be advantageous in football and basketball and how quickness can override any handicap arising from preferring the right over the left when moving on a court or field.
Too much Information. Cannot be assumed. Eliminate.
B: Miles’s virtues as a basketball player should be determined by relevant statistics, such as shooting percentage and steals.
Nowhere talks about shooting% and steals. Too much information. Out of scope. Eliminate.
C: It is unfair to jump to conclusions about athletic prowess and effectiveness simply because a player is short.
Not an assumptiom. Also, not at all the reason for the commentators disagreement. He says it is unfair because earlier similar charachtetstics had shown success. Eliminate.
D: Height and left-right preferences have comparable value in football and basketball.
Commentators critics have been comparing these virtues and characteristics. Hence it is basic that these are comparable values. Still keep it and look for a better anwer.
E: Evaluation of basketball players must take into account what position they play on a team, and in particular, what kind of role a coach assigns to them to effectuate the goals of the team.
Nowhere he talks about positioning in play and role of coach. Too much info and out of scope. Eliminate.
D is the only option which fits.
D is the Answer.
Posted from my mobile device