Premise:
1. Criminal justice system relies on amateur juries of decent citizens, who lack the perspective to understand the criminal mind.
2. Effective criminal justice system would require professional juries, who would be able to deal with these criminals in a way that gets results.
Conclusion:
1. Our criminal justice system is inherently flawed
A. Professional jurors will be more
reliable than amateur jurors because they will not attempt to avoid jury duty...........This is irrelevant from the argument perspective.
B. Professional jurors will not
be burdened by the biases against race, gender, and religion that amateur jurors bring into the courtroom.........................There is nothing in the passage basis which we can say that this is 100% true.
C. Dealing with criminals in a way that gets results requires an understanding of the criminal mind......................Well this seems logical connection between understanding criminal minds and getting results. This is the assumption.
D. No amount of
professional training can impart the perspective of the criminal mind necessary to run an effective criminal justice system............................Professional training is out of scope.
E. Jurors possessing the perspective to understand the criminal mind are
unfit to serve on a jury, because they are likely to be criminals.............................Out of scope.
IMO OA should be C