In an experiment, biologists repeatedly shone a bright light into a tank containing a sea snail and simultaneously shook the tank. The snail invariably responded by tensing its muscular “foot,” a typical reaction in sea snails to ocean turbulence. After several repetitions of this procedure, the snail tensed its “foot” whenever the biologists shone the light into its tank, even when the tank was not simultaneously shaken.
Therefore, the snail must have learned to associate the shining of the bright light with the shaking of the tank.
Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
The appearance of bright light simultaneously with shaking of tank must have made snail to tense its 'foot', but what it does when one does not occur. Does it still tense?
(A)
All sea snails react to ocean turbulence in
the same way as the sea snail in the experiment did. - WRONG. No concerned about reaction of all snails.
(B) Sea snails are
not ordinarily exposed to bright lights such as the one used in the biologists’ experiment. - WRONG. Irrelevant.
(C) The sea snail used in the experiment did not
differ significantly from other members of its species in its reaction to external stimuli. - WRONG. There is no comparison required as such to be made to strengthen the passage. It is irrelevant.
(D) The appearance of a bright light alone would ordinarily not result in the sea snail’s tensing its “foot.” - CORRECT. If so, then snail must have learnt to tense its 'foot'.
(E) Tensing of the muscular “foot” in sea snails is an
instinctual rather than a learned
response to ocean turbulence. - WRONG. It actually weakens the conclusion so it can't be the assumption.
Answer D.