Wow, how great to see the Purewals active on the site again—I guess I am about a month behind. (Ron, I would like to think that my request to you in
one of my posts played some small part in persuading you to return, but you need not spoil the mystery.) I am not sure whether an official analysis is forthcoming, so I will refrain from posting a full breakdown of the passage, question, and answer choices. I will say, however, that in order to
cast doubt on the viability of
any plan, a test-taker had better understand the plan in question. Here, the crux of the matter lies in the throwaway phrase
in order to cut costs. Follow that thought, and one answer stands alone.
As someone who dabbles in question-writing, and as my signature suggests, I can be a harsh critic of questions by third parties. (I wrote a post just yesterday on a Quant question I found unsatisfactory by GMAT™ standards.) I would like to say that I enjoyed working through this one, which has the right (GMAT™-like) "feel" to it. Thank you for sharing, Sarah and Ron.
- Andrew