Claim: Minister of education claims that
teachers’ attitudes are causing a decline in student performance
Alternate Observation: But at the workshops in Teachers associations meetings, teachers work to find new ways to teach their student.
Claim derived from alternate observation: No one could detect any
negative attitudes toward students.
Possible flaw: Agreed negative attitudes were not observed in meetings, but the Teacher's positive or neutral attitudes toward students are causing a decline in student performance.
(A) The argument focuses on the opponent rather than on the opponent’s argument.
--> False. Argument does not focus on minister at all.
(B) The argument takes for granted that the minister of education would be an unsympathetic observer.
--> False. Argument does not assume this.
(C) The argument takes for granted that only when teachers’ attitudes toward students are negative will those attitudes cause a decline in student performance.
--> Correct. (D) The argument draws a conclusion that simply restates a claim presented in support of that conclusion.
--> False. Argument claims that teachers attitudes in the meetings is not negative, and therefore concludes that attitude of teacher towards children is not a cause for the student's decline in perfromance.
(E) The argument presumes, without providing justification, that teachers’ attitudes toward students cannot have any effect on student performance.
--> False. This statement stretches to extreme. Argument could be true even when we assume teachers' attitudes towards students can have +ve or -ve impact on students performance.