Publishers, like all private businesses, have always been concerned about profitability. But, while it used to be at least possible to get a book published that was unlikely to be popular, and hence unlikely to be a moneymaker, profitability is now the sole criterion. Thus, no matter how much literary merit a book possesses, it will not be published in today’s market if it looks like it will not be popular.
Which one of the following sentences most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument?
(A) Books of literary merit
cannot be published in today’s market. - WRONG. An absolute statement may not be true in this case. Exception can be there.
(B) Publishers used to
select books for publication
based on literary merit. - WRONG. Totally goes offtrack.
(C) Good books are published now
only if they are also likely to be popular. - CORRECT. True. "Good" can be subjective and can be eliminated.
(D) It is harder to get a book published today than it once was. - WRONG. Altogether irrelevant.
(E) Unpopular books are not likely to make money for the publisher. - WRONG. First, being unpopular is a likelihood prior to publishing. But if anyhow an unpopular book is published it can either make money or may not. Hence a reverse case can't be the main conclusion.
C and E are only contenders.
Answer C.