USA automotive companies are having a difficult time competing with car manufacturers in South Korea. USA manufacturers have decided that they must significantly lower the wages of their employees in order to compete with Korean manufacturers, because wages constitute approximately 30% of the cost of producing an automobile.
Which of the following, if true, provides the most compelling argument against lowering wages?
We need to find the reason why USA manufacturers shouldn't lower wages. USA manufacturers are trying to cut costs to compete with Korean manufacturers
A]
Lowering wages will cause the best workers to leave, lowering quality of the final product, which could lower sales. - Correct
Provides the negative consequence of lowering wages. This explains why USA manufacturers will be unable to compete with Korean manufacturers after lowering wages.
B]
Raw materials, such as steel, constitute 55% of the cost of an automobile. - wrongJust gives the proportion of raw material cost in the total of an automobile
C]
US automakers have recently made inroads on foreign manufacturers and recaptured market share. - wrongThis is not a compelling argument against lowering wages. Korean manufacturers may still have an upper hand.
D]
U.S. worker's wages are 25% higher than those of workers in South Korea. - wrongWage difference doesn't provide a compelling argument. The standard of living may be different in the two countries
E]
U.S auto manufacturers recently increased their spending on advertising. - wrongNot a compelling argument against lowering wages. Doesn't provide a reason why the wages should not be lowered