S-1 The newly renovated housing development in city X is cleaner, bigger, and less expensive than other local housing developments.
Conclusion- The development, therefore, should attract thousands of people and become the most popular residential area in city X.
Which of the following, if true,
would LEAST weaken the argument above?
We need to find the answer that weaken the conclusion least.
(A) The housing development is located near many local stores and highways. keep it as it may help in attracting many people
(B) A cleaner and less expensive housing development has recently been built in city X. This is weakening the conclusion as other people may go to this newer society
(C) The housing development provides no convenient access to secondary schools. This is also weakening the conclusion if no schools are available in the vicinity people may avoid coming to this society.
(D) Most of those planning to move to city X are reluctant to move into renovated buildings. This is also weakening the conclusion as people do not want to move to renovated building.
(E) Although rents are lower in the renovated development than they are at other comparable housing projects, when utility bills are included, the cost of living is higher in the new development. This is also weakening the conclusion because it is removing one of the lucrative factors of living in that development.
Hence the Answer is A