Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 04:08 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 04:08
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,822
Own Kudos:
811,141
 [4]
Given Kudos: 105,878
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,822
Kudos: 811,141
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
cdrectenwald
Joined: 05 May 2018
Last visit: 22 Mar 2026
Posts: 102
Own Kudos:
148
 [2]
Given Kudos: 54
Posts: 102
Kudos: 148
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
VivekSri
Joined: 01 May 2022
Last visit: 05 Feb 2026
Posts: 468
Own Kudos:
772
 [3]
Given Kudos: 117
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Posts: 468
Kudos: 772
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,822
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,878
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,822
Kudos: 811,141
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Mice treated with certain statins intended to decrease blood pressure also experienced drug-induced toxic myopathy, also known as muscular degeneration. Scientists hypothesize that this may have occurred because the statins cause an over-activation of creatine kinases, which are known to cause muscular degeneration.

Which of the following experiments would yield the most useful results for analyzing the scientists’ hypothesis?

A. Administering statins to mice with increased creatine kinase activity and observing creatine kinase activity.

B. Injecting mice with a creatine kinase inhibitor before administering the statins and then monitoring muscle tissue response.

C. Injecting mice with creatine kinase inhibitors and then monitoring muscle tissue response.

D. Injecting mice with muscle repair medication and then monitoring levels of muscular response.

E. Measuring mice’s level of muscular myopathy, administering a creatine kinase inhibitor, and then measuring myopathy once more




VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTION:



When you are asked to determine which experiment would yield useful results for analyzing a particular problem, recognize that this means that you are dealing with a (slightly less obvious) Useful to Evaluate problem. With any Useful to Evaluate problem, remember that you first want to look at the stimulus itself to figure out what the scientists or analysts are trying to determine. Then look for the gap - what piece of information is missing that could potentially either prove their hypothesis or disprove it?

The stimulus states that mice treated with statins experienced drug-induced muscular degeneration and that the scientists think this might have been cause by the statins over-activating something called creatine kinase (which is known to cause muscular degeneration). Notice that the hypothesis has to do with cause and effect: statins cause an over-activation of creatine kinase, which causes muscular degeneration. But what if the statins directly caused the degeneration instead of causing that intermediate step? Choice (B) is the only option that accounts for this possibility. By first administering a creatine kinase blocker, scientists can ensure that the effect is caused because the statins activate the creatine kinase rather than because the statins directly damage muscles. Choice (B) is therefore correct.

Among the other answers, choices (A) and (D) can be eliminated because they don't mention creatine kinase at all. Choice (C) can be eliminated because it doesn't mention the administering the statin. Since you're looking for the mechanism by which the statin causes muscular degeneration. Choice (E) can be eliminated because it's already known that creatine kinase can cause muscular myopathy - you don't need to establish that again, so (E) can be eliminated.
User avatar
Pranavsawant
Joined: 20 Jun 2025
Last visit: 07 Apr 2026
Posts: 89
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 326
Location: India
Schools: ISB (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 725 Q90 V87 DI81
GPA: 3.99
Schools: ISB (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 725 Q90 V87 DI81
Posts: 89
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There is a glaring problem with B which most people have not noticed. Let's say you feed them the inhibitor, then feed the statins and measure creatine kinase activity. If the activity increases, then we can say that yes, statins do indeed cause an over-activation cause despite the inhibitor we are still seeing an increased creatine kinase activity.

However, if there is so such increase in creatine kinase activity or even if there is a decrease after feeding them statins, we cannot conclude that statins don't increase creatine kinase activity. It might very well be possible that because of the dominant effects of the inhibitor, the statins did increase creatine kinase activity but it could not increase it enough to counter the inhibiot's effects. So we can't make the conclusion that the hypothesis is wrong. In both cases, the hypothesis may be correct.

Now let's come to option A. Here we are offering statins to the mice with increase creatine kinase activity. If after feeding statins, creatine kinase activity further increases, then yes statins do have the intended effect. However, if it doesn't then we can make the case that statins aren't the reason for increased muscular degeneration. Bit of a gap there but A makes a lot more sense than B which introduces an extra variable that might completely skew the argument.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
504 posts
358 posts