Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
11 Apr 2024, 06:09
Kudos
Bookmarks
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
85%
(hard)
Question Stats:
56% (02:26) correct
44%
(02:35)
wrong
based on 1194
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Professor: The author's reconstruction of the street system of medieval Constantinople is based on the assumption that the position of present-day structures constitutes evidence of medieval street alignment. While this is not an unreasonable assumption, the author's reconstruction is suspect because, for one thing, the structures that are alleged to preserve medieval street alignments are of widely differing dates spanning fourteen centuries. Some may claim that later structures replaced earlier ones on the same alignment, but there is no archaeological evidence to support this.
Which of the following most accurately describes the roles played in the professor's argument by the two portions in boldface?
A. The first is a premise meant to support the argument's main conclusion; the second is presented as a rebuttal of a cited objection.
B. The first is meant as a concession to a position that the argument rejects; the second is meant to undermine a potential objection to a premise of the argument.
C. The first states a criticism of the position that the argument opposes; the second is a premise meant to directly support the argument's main conclusion.
D. The first expresses partial agreement with the position that the argument rejects; the second is the position the argument rejects.
E. The first anticipates and rejects a criticism to which the argument could be susceptible; the second denies an assumption upon which an opposing argument rests.
Which of the following most accurately describes the roles played in the professor's argument by the two portions in boldface?
A. The first is a premise meant to support the argument's main conclusion; the second is presented as a rebuttal of a cited objection.
B. The first is meant as a concession to a position that the argument rejects; the second is meant to undermine a potential objection to a premise of the argument.
C. The first states a criticism of the position that the argument opposes; the second is a premise meant to directly support the argument's main conclusion.
D. The first expresses partial agreement with the position that the argument rejects; the second is the position the argument rejects.
E. The first anticipates and rejects a criticism to which the argument could be susceptible; the second denies an assumption upon which an opposing argument rests.
Using official mocks already?
Add GMAT Club Tests for harder practice, analytics, and explanations without overlapping Official Guide or official mock questions.
Try it now →
Updated on: 16 Mar 2026, 16:29
Originally posted by MartyMurray on 13 Apr 2024, 15:12.
Last edited by MartyMurray on 16 Mar 2026, 16:29, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by MartyMurray on 16 Mar 2026, 16:29, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Bookmarks
Professor: The author's reconstruction of the street system of medieval Constantinople is based on the assumption that the position of present-day structures constitutes evidence of medieval street alignment. While this is not an unreasonable assumption, the author's reconstruction is suspect because, for one thing, the structures that are alleged to preserve medieval street alignments are of widely differing dates spanning fourteen centuries. Some may claim that later structures replaced earlier ones on the same alignment, but there is no archaeological evidence to support this.
The passage is about "the author's reconstruction of the street system of medieval Constantinople."
The passage begins by presenting an assumption upon with "the author's reconstruction" is based:
The author's reconstruction of the street system of medieval Constantinople is based on the assumption that the position of present-day structures constitutes evidence of medieval street alignment.
The passage then offers a concession regarding that assumption:
this is not an unreasonable assumption
By saying the above, the argument concedes that, at least, an assumption underlying "the author's reconstruction" is reasonable.
Then comes the main conclusion of the passage:
the author's reconstruction is suspect
Then, the support marker "because" introduces evidence in support of the main conclusion:
for one thing, the structures that are alleged to preserve medieval street alignments are of widely differing dates spanning fourteen centuries
A potential objection to that support is mentioned:
Some may claim that later structures replaced earlier ones on the same alignment
Finally, that potential objection is countered:
there is no archaeological evidence to support this
Which of the following most accurately describes the roles played in the professor's argument by the two portions in boldface?
A. The first is a premise meant to support the argument's main conclusion; the second is presented as a rebuttal of a cited objection.
The second part of this choice is correct. After all, the purpose of the second boldfaced portion is to counter an objection to the support for the main conclusion.
However, the first part of this choice is incorrect since the first is not a premise. Rather, it's a concession that an assumption supporting a position that that argument opposes is "not ... unreasonable." So, the first does basically the opposite of supporting the argument's main conclusion since it concedes that part of an argument that the conclusion opposes is reasonable.
Eliminate.
B. The first is meant as a concession to a position that the argument rejects; the second is meant to undermine a potential objection to a premise of the argument.
The first part of this choice is correct. After all, in saying that an assumption that supports "the author's reconstruction" is "not an unreasonable assumption," the first boldfaced portion concedes that at least part of "the author's" reasoning, which the argument rejects, is reasonable.
The second part of this choice is correct as well since the second boldfaced portion indicates that the objection "later structures replaced earlier ones on the same alignment" is not supported by evidence. In other words, the second boldfaced portion serves to "undermine" that objection.
Keep.
C. The first states a criticism of the position that the argument opposes; the second is a premise meant to directly support the argument's main conclusion.
The first does not state a criticism of the position that the argument opposes. Rather, the first does basically the opposite of stating a criticism by conceding that at least an assumption on which the position is based is reasonable.
Also, the second does not "directly support" the main conclusion. Rather, it indirectly supports the main conclusion by countering an objection to the support for the main conclusion.
Eliminate.
D. The first expresses partial agreement with the position that the argument rejects; the second is the position the argument rejects.
The first does not "express partial agreement with the position that the argument rejects." Rather, the first concedes that an assumption on which that position is based is reasonable. Conceding that an assumption is reasonable is not the same as partially agreeing with the position itself.
The second is not the position the argument rejects. Rather, the second states a reason to reject that position.
Eliminate.
E. The first anticipates and rejects a criticism to which the argument could be susceptible; the second denies an assumption upon which an opposing argument rests.
The second part of this choice is close to correct since the second boldfaced portion could be seen as denying that "later structures replaced earlier ones on the same alignment," which could be seen as an assumption on which the position the argument opposes rests.
At the same time, we can confidently eliminate this choice since the first boldfaced portion does not "reject" anything. Rather, the first concedes that an assumption is "not ... unreasonable," in other words, that the assumption is reasonable. Conceding that something is reasonable is basically the opposite of rejecting it.
Eliminate.
Correct answer: B
The passage is about "the author's reconstruction of the street system of medieval Constantinople."
The passage begins by presenting an assumption upon with "the author's reconstruction" is based:
The author's reconstruction of the street system of medieval Constantinople is based on the assumption that the position of present-day structures constitutes evidence of medieval street alignment.
The passage then offers a concession regarding that assumption:
this is not an unreasonable assumption
By saying the above, the argument concedes that, at least, an assumption underlying "the author's reconstruction" is reasonable.
Then comes the main conclusion of the passage:
the author's reconstruction is suspect
Then, the support marker "because" introduces evidence in support of the main conclusion:
for one thing, the structures that are alleged to preserve medieval street alignments are of widely differing dates spanning fourteen centuries
A potential objection to that support is mentioned:
Some may claim that later structures replaced earlier ones on the same alignment
Finally, that potential objection is countered:
there is no archaeological evidence to support this
Which of the following most accurately describes the roles played in the professor's argument by the two portions in boldface?
A. The first is a premise meant to support the argument's main conclusion; the second is presented as a rebuttal of a cited objection.
The second part of this choice is correct. After all, the purpose of the second boldfaced portion is to counter an objection to the support for the main conclusion.
However, the first part of this choice is incorrect since the first is not a premise. Rather, it's a concession that an assumption supporting a position that that argument opposes is "not ... unreasonable." So, the first does basically the opposite of supporting the argument's main conclusion since it concedes that part of an argument that the conclusion opposes is reasonable.
Eliminate.
B. The first is meant as a concession to a position that the argument rejects; the second is meant to undermine a potential objection to a premise of the argument.
The first part of this choice is correct. After all, in saying that an assumption that supports "the author's reconstruction" is "not an unreasonable assumption," the first boldfaced portion concedes that at least part of "the author's" reasoning, which the argument rejects, is reasonable.
The second part of this choice is correct as well since the second boldfaced portion indicates that the objection "later structures replaced earlier ones on the same alignment" is not supported by evidence. In other words, the second boldfaced portion serves to "undermine" that objection.
Keep.
C. The first states a criticism of the position that the argument opposes; the second is a premise meant to directly support the argument's main conclusion.
The first does not state a criticism of the position that the argument opposes. Rather, the first does basically the opposite of stating a criticism by conceding that at least an assumption on which the position is based is reasonable.
Also, the second does not "directly support" the main conclusion. Rather, it indirectly supports the main conclusion by countering an objection to the support for the main conclusion.
Eliminate.
D. The first expresses partial agreement with the position that the argument rejects; the second is the position the argument rejects.
The first does not "express partial agreement with the position that the argument rejects." Rather, the first concedes that an assumption on which that position is based is reasonable. Conceding that an assumption is reasonable is not the same as partially agreeing with the position itself.
The second is not the position the argument rejects. Rather, the second states a reason to reject that position.
Eliminate.
E. The first anticipates and rejects a criticism to which the argument could be susceptible; the second denies an assumption upon which an opposing argument rests.
The second part of this choice is close to correct since the second boldfaced portion could be seen as denying that "later structures replaced earlier ones on the same alignment," which could be seen as an assumption on which the position the argument opposes rests.
At the same time, we can confidently eliminate this choice since the first boldfaced portion does not "reject" anything. Rather, the first concedes that an assumption is "not ... unreasonable," in other words, that the assumption is reasonable. Conceding that something is reasonable is basically the opposite of rejecting it.
Eliminate.
Correct answer: B
General Discussion
12 Apr 2024, 20:49
Kudos
Bookmarks
I believe the correct answer is B)
The first is meant as a concession to a position that the argument rejects; the second is meant to undermine a potential objection to a premise of the argument.
As we can see in the argument, the professor acknowledges the following "The author's reconstruction of the street system of medieval Constantinople is based on the assumption that the position of present-day structures constitutes evidence of medieval street alignment." Then proceeds to state a potential objection, and provides evidence to undermine it "Some may claim that later structures replaced earlier ones on the same alignment, but there is no archaeological evidence to support this."
The first is meant as a concession to a position that the argument rejects; the second is meant to undermine a potential objection to a premise of the argument.
As we can see in the argument, the professor acknowledges the following "The author's reconstruction of the street system of medieval Constantinople is based on the assumption that the position of present-day structures constitutes evidence of medieval street alignment." Then proceeds to state a potential objection, and provides evidence to undermine it "Some may claim that later structures replaced earlier ones on the same alignment, but there is no archaeological evidence to support this."
