An 1832 travelers account of rural Ireland remarks on the use of

Question

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

An 1832 traveler’s account of rural Ireland remarks on the use of pottery called “redware" produced by small, local potteries. The traveler predicted that this pottery would be replaced by factory-made pottery. As a matter of fact, economic historians have assumed that all the redware potteries closed during the 1840‘s. The recent discovery, through archaeological investigation, that redware was still in use in the 1860‘s does not disprove the historians’ assumption, because ________.

A. the redware potteries are not mentioned in any government tax records from the 1800‘s, and none of the potteries’ own records, if there were any, survive

B. factory-made pottery was found at the sites where redware was found, and it was in use there at the same time as redware

C. the few nineteenth-century writings that mention redware all predate the 1840‘s

D. redware pottery was known for its exceptional durability

E. the sites where the redware was found were cottages that were abandoned about the middle of the 1860‘s

https://gmatclub.com/forum/download/file.php?id=76036

Carcass · Answer

here, we need some sort of statement that reinforces the question itself

we need something that tells us about the pottery and its usage NOT the pottery itself

D. redware pottery was known for its  exceptional durability  out of scope

E. the sites where the redware was found were cottages that were abandoned about the middle of the 1860‘s

E instead tells us that the pottery was there since 1860 and does not invalidate the assumption of the scholars

gmathero911 · Answer

carcass  I also chose E instead of D, yet the OG answer is D

divyansh843 · Answer

D is the answer according to me. 
Even though all redware potteries were closed in 1840's, archaeologists have found that redware pottey was in use in the 1860's

A. the redware potteries are not mentioned in any government tax records from the 1800‘s, and none of the potteries’ own records, if there were any, survive - does not have any affect on redware pottery being in use in 1860's

B. factory-made pottery was found at the sites where redware was found, and it was in use there at the same time as redware - we are talking about redware pottery in use rather than factory made pottery in use so no effect

C. the few nineteenth-century writings that mention redware all predate the 1840‘s - no effect on historians findings

D. redware pottery was known for its exceptional durability - if it was in use during the 1860's it might be a reason that it was exceptionally durable

E. the sites where the redware was found were cottages that were abandoned about the middle of the 1860‘s - we are talking about the usage of redware pottery rather finding of redware pottery

Posted from my mobile device

sachi-in · Answer

Summary:   1832 - redware potteries were made in local potteries - predicted that it will be replaced by factory made potteries - historians hypothesis: the redware potteries closed during the 1840‘s
 that redware was still in use in the 1860‘s does not disprove the historians’ assumption, because ________ (  why  does it not disprove ? )

prethinking:   red potteries were found ( Used ) even in 1860s but that doesn't mean the historians were wrong ( i.e their production ceased )  -  why? 
  ofcourse becuase those made in 1800s could have survived ( 100 years ) the test of times ( they were not damaged ) !

After thinking through the reason if we go over to the answers option D clearly is the only option that fits this logic.

We will go about and check the other options:

A. the redware potteries are not mentioned in any government tax records from the 1800‘s, and none of the potteries’ own records, if there were any, survive   -    if there were no records then in no way it can prove why historian was right even though the pottery was used in 1860s

B. factory-made pottery was found at the sites where redware was found, and it was in use there at the same time as redware  -   ok we know they were in use side by side but it could be in the 1800s or 1890s, it does not prove that redwares existed after 1860s inspite of ceased production

C. the few nineteenth-century writings that mention redware all predate the 1840‘s -  doesnot prove that redwares were being used even after production ceased, it even proves that literary sources suggest no redwares were in use after 1840s

E. the sites where the redware was found were cottages that were abandoned about the middle of the 1860‘s -  In early 1860s the cottages were still in use along with the potteries it doesnot provide reason why the potteries were still in use even when their production ceased

Carcass · Answer

But I do not remember the OA was D. It is messy when , especially, the OA is reported wrongly

HarshavardhanR · Answer

What we really need  -> is a reason to support the idea that the economic historians' assumption still works despite the recent discovery.

To be more specific  -> something that suggests that the discovery of redware still being used in the 1860's does not go against the assumption that all the redware potteries closed earlier (in the 1840's).

In other words  -> What can explain the fact that redware was still being used in the 1860's despite no production of redware pottery (because the redware potteries closed in the 1840's)?

Choice D  -> redware pottery was known for its exceptional durability

Ah! This can explain why redware pottery was still in use in the 1860's despite no such pottery being produced in that time period. Redware pottery made decades earlier (1840's or earlier), thanks to the "exceptional durability", continued to be used in the 1860's.

Choice D makes sense in my view.

Cheers!
___
Harsha
Enthu about all things GMAT | Exploring the GMAT space | My website: gmatanchor.com

8Harshitsharma · Answer

For those wondering about choice E, it does not present any new information. We already know that redware pottery was used in the 1960s from the question stem.

Choice D states that the pottery was durable and hence supports the conclusion that its existence in the 1960s doesn't disprove the claim that it wasn't manufactured after the 1940s.

pradeepkmr0047 · Answer

Please refer to the attachment

Raman109 · Answer

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

An 1832 traveler’s account of rural Ireland remarks on the use of pottery called “redware" produced by small, local potteries. The traveler predicted that this pottery would be replaced by factory-made pottery. As a matter of fact, economic historians have assumed that all the redware potteries closed during the 1840‘s. The recent discovery, through archaeological investigation, that redware was still in use in the 1860‘s does not disprove the historians’ assumption, because ________.

So basically, we need to find a strengthener which would substantiate the fact that usage of redware is not equal to production of redware. Because, "Economic historians have assumed that all the redware potteries closed during the 1840‘s."

A. the redware potteries are not mentioned in any government tax records from the 1800‘s, and none of the potteries’ own records, if there were any, survive - irrelevant.

B. factory-made pottery was found at the sites where redware was found, and it was in use there at the same time as redware - irrelevant.

C. the few nineteenth-century writings that mention redware all predate the 1840‘s - irrelevant.

D. redware pottery was known for its exceptional durability - ok. They were not produced after 1840's but the one produced in or before 1940's was very durable and people kept using it.

E. the sites where the redware was found were cottages that were abandoned about the middle of the 1860‘s - But still doesnt clear weather it was produced after 1940's or not.

yazlal25 · Answer

The last sentence tells us that the redware was still in use in 1860's even though it was believed by historians that all redware potteries close in the 1840's. 
If you prethink, there could be two reasons why this would happen:
1. The historian's assumptions about closure of all redware potteries in 1840's was incorrect (nothing such is mentioned in any of the options)
2. The redware potteries made before 1840's lasted until 1860's (proving that they were quite durable)

Option D points to the second reasoning, hence it is the correct option.

rak08 · Answer

When they say "assumed that all redware potteries closed during 1840s" means production ceased.
yet they found redware in use in 1860s ~ so people are using the old ones still 
this means D exceptional durability.

However i got confused between C & D, as C says writing that mentioned were predated in 1840s but this would still not explain why is it still in use in 1860s. it just shows that 1840s mentioned redware others don't. maybe something else caught writers attention over a redware.
E rather just reconfirms that it was in use in 1860s ~ this maybe says that historians could or could not be wrong.

An 1832 travelers account of rural Ireland remarks on the use of

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

An 1832 travelers account of rural Ireland remarks on the use of

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards