Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 04:04 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 04:04
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
kingbucky
Joined: 28 Jul 2023
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 498
Own Kudos:
584
 [10]
Given Kudos: 329
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 498
Kudos: 584
 [10]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Yaswanth9696
Joined: 24 Sep 2024
Last visit: 22 Feb 2025
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
28
 [1]
Given Kudos: 27
Posts: 34
Kudos: 28
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,706
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,706
Kudos: 2,329
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
pdave
Joined: 27 Oct 2025
Last visit: 16 Jan 2026
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 48
Posts: 37
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Doesn't the passage say:
Passage says
City Population ---> City Pollution
less City Population ----> Less City Pollution Less Country Pollution?

unraveled
­Branson: Most of the air pollution in this country comes from our largest cities. These cities would pollute less if they were less populated. So if many people in these cities were to move to rural areas, air pollution in the country as a whole would be reduced.

Which one of the following demonstrates most effectively by parallel reasoning that Branson’s argument is flawed?

(A) Similarly, we could conclude that Monique spends most of her salary on housing. After all, people are bound to spend more on housing if they live in a city where the cost of housing is high, and Monique recently moved to a city where the cost of housing is very high. - WRONG. Does not look flawed. In a city where CoL is high then someone moving there would also be spending high on CoL.
(B) Similarly, we could conclude that Karen’s family would have more living space if they moved from an apartment to a single-family home. After all, single-family homes are typically larger than apartments. - WRONG. Like A this too make sense in that more spacious the home is more space it is compared to apartments.
(C) Similarly, we could conclude that most of Ward’s farm is planted with corn. After all, in Ward’s county most of the fields that used to be planted with other crops are now planted with corn. - WRONG. Looks somewhat flawed but not in a manner as the passage is.
(D) Similarly, we could conclude that Javier could consume fewer calories by eating for breakfast, lunch, and dinner only a portion of what he now eats, and eating the remainder as snacks. After all, breakfast, lunch, and dinner together account for most of the calories Javier consumes. - CORRECT. What if snacks matches the calorie levels of all the three? Like if rural areas to make pollution then passage is making a flaw.
(E) Similarly, we could conclude that most of this city’s air pollution would be eliminated if this city built a public transportation system. After all, public transportation produces much less pollution per passenger, and all automobile trips could be replaced by trips on public transportation.­ - WRONG. Plain logical. No flaws as such.

Passage says
City Population ---> City Pollution
less City Population ----> Less City Pollution

Answer D.
User avatar
miag
User avatar
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 10 Dec 2023
Last visit: 15 Feb 2026
Posts: 404
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 737
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Sustainability
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q87 V83 DI80
GPA: 3.2/4
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q87 V83 DI80
Posts: 404
Kudos: 159
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

Yes - your logic is correct here!

pdave
Doesn't the passage say:
Passage says
City Population ---> City Pollution
less City Population ----> Less City Pollution Less Country Pollution?


Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts