Candidate for Mayor: My opponent argues that the best way to increase

Question

Candidate for Mayor: My opponent argues that the best way to increase the city's tax revenues is to double the tax on rental cars so that non-residents provide the bulk of the additional income. This plan is unethical because it constitutes taxation without representation: we should not excessively tax those who cannot vote on the plan. Moreover, if car rental prices are too high in our city, people may simply rent cars in neighboring cities to avoid the tax surcharge.

The candidate responds to her opponent's plan by ______.

A. Introducing a moral quandary that cannot be resolved without additional data.

B. Arguing for an alternate strategy by which to accomplish the declared objective.

C. Claiming that the opponent's proposal contains inaccurate data.

D. Implying that the plan may result in the opposite of the intended effect.

E. Demonstrating that her opponent's plan would fail to achieve its goal.

This is a  CR Butler Question

Check the links to other Butler Projects:

Data Sufficiency Butler  
  Problem Solving Butler  
  Sentence Correction Butler  
  Reading Comprehension Butler  
  Integrated Reasoning Butler

MalachiKeti · Answer

Bunuel  can you pls explain why D and not E

ScottTargetTestPrep

rito54 · Answer

Hello anyone would have the answer? What is the difference between:

D. Implying that the plan may result in the opposite of the intended effect.

E. Demonstrating that her opponent's plan would fail to achieve its goal

Thank you!

Raghunandan19 · Answer

Bunuel, why is it D and not E? because the candidate is demonstrating that the plan to increase tax on rental cars would fail

prashantdhirendra · Answer

Candidate for Mayor: My opponent argues that the best way to increase the city's tax revenues is to double the tax on rental cars so that non-residents provide the bulk of the additional income. This plan is unethical because it constitutes taxation without representation: we should not excessively tax those who cannot vote on the plan. Moreover, if car rental prices are too high in our city, people may simply rent cars in neighboring cities to avoid the tax surcharge.

The candidate responds to her opponent's plan by ______.

A. Introducing a moral quandary that cannot be resolved without additional data.

B. Arguing for an alternate strategy by which to accomplish the declared objective.

C. Claiming that the opponent's proposal contains inaccurate data.

D. Implying that the plan may result in the opposite of the intended effect.

E. Demonstrating that her opponent's plan would fail to achieve its goal.

This is a CR Butler Question

Check the links to other Butler Projects:

EnglishAgast · Answer

It is (D)

.

If the above happens, then it might not increase the revenue of the mayor candidate's city and might increase the revenue of the neighbouring cities.

carbonex8010 · Answer

"Moreover, if car rental prices are too high in our city, people may simply rent cars in neighboring cities to avoid the tax surcharge. "
 It implies that if people avoid tax surcharge it would also lead to less tax collection. so option D is right and not E.

Bunuel · Answer

Manhattan Prep Official Solution

We are asked to analyze the candidate's argument: what reasoning does she employ in her response to the opponent's plan? The opponent proposes a way to increase tax revenues. The candidate provides two reasons for rejecting the plan: first, the plan is morally wrong, and, second, it may not even work because people may rent cars in other cities instead. The correct answer must describe one or both of these objections.

(A) The candidate does introduce a moral concern, but does not present it as a quandary that cannot be solved without more data. In fact, the candidate takes a very specific stand, claiming unequivocally that the plan is morally wrong.

(B) The candidate does not argue for, or even mention, an alternate strategy by which to raise the city's tax revenues.

(C) The candidate does not attack or refute any data used by the opponent; she merely suggests that the opponent's plan might not work as intended.

(D)  CORRECT .  The candidate suggests, via her second objection, that people might choose to rent cars in neighboring cities to avoid the higher tax. If this occurred, it could potentially reduce the number of car rentals in the candidate's city, with the result that the city's tax revenues from this source would decrease - the opposite of the opponent's intended goal.

(E) In her second objection, the candidate offers a reason why the plan might not work as intended. Her objection relies on a conjecture about how people would behave. It does not, therefore, demonstrate (i.e., prove) that the plan would fail.

MuskaanMittal · Answer

E cannot be the answer as it is too extreme, whereas the argument is not using such an extreme language

Candidate for Mayor: My opponent argues that the best way to increase

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

Candidate for Mayor: My opponent argues that the best way to increase

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards