Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0907:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway
Sep 0410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0812:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Looking for your GMAT motivation to break through the score plateau? Pragati improved her score by massive 160 points with strategic guidance and hard-work! Find out how personalized mentorship and a strong mindset can turn GMAT struggles into success.- Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1001:00 AM EDT
-02:00 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Sep 1008:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
GmatStuck
Joined: 15 Sep 2021
Last visit: 03 Feb 2026
Posts: 59
Given Kudos: 15
Concentration: Finance
Schools: Columbia CBS '24 Haas '24 Wharton '24 Yale '24
Products:
25 Feb 2025, 16:32
Kudos
Bookmarks
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
65%
(hard)
Question Stats:
61% (01:58) correct
39%
(02:04)
wrong
based on 461
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Trade negotiator: Increasing economic prosperity in a country tends to bring political freedom to its inhabitants. Therefore, it is wrong for any country to adopt trade policies that are likely to seriously hinder growth in the prosperity of any other country.
Which one of the following principles, if valid, would most help to justify the trade negotiator's reasoning?
(A) Every country should adopt at least some policies that encourage the development of political freedom in other countries.
(B) Both economic prosperity and political freedom can contribute to the overall well-being of any country's inhabitants.
(C) The primary reason that any country seeks economic prosperity is to foster political freedom in that country.
(D) A country should not do anything that might hinder the growth of political freedom in any other country.
(E) It is wrong for any country to adopt trade policies that might diminish the prosperity of its inhabitants.
Which one of the following principles, if valid, would most help to justify the trade negotiator's reasoning?
(A) Every country should adopt at least some policies that encourage the development of political freedom in other countries.
(B) Both economic prosperity and political freedom can contribute to the overall well-being of any country's inhabitants.
(C) The primary reason that any country seeks economic prosperity is to foster political freedom in that country.
(D) A country should not do anything that might hinder the growth of political freedom in any other country.
(E) It is wrong for any country to adopt trade policies that might diminish the prosperity of its inhabitants.
06 Mar 2025, 14:50
Kudos
Bookmarks
Here is my reasoning.
Conclusion: Therefore, it is wrong for any country to adopt trade policies that are likely to seriously hinder growth in the prosperity of any other country.
This is a judgement that the negotiator is passing that IT IS WRONG to adopt trade policies which have the probability of hindering growth for the other country.
If we notice this judgement, it sounds STRONG.
(A)- Every country should adopt at least some policies that encourage the development of political freedom in other countries.
This means at least some policies should support the growth, which also means that there may be some policies that do not support. But our conclusion is strongly saying it is wrong to have a negative policy only. Therefore it is wrong.
(B)- Overall well being is out of scope.
(C)- Why a country seeks economic prosperity is irrelevant to the conclusion.
(E)- Conclusion is concerned about other countries option is about our country. Clearly, going in wrong direction.
This lefts us with D
Notice how strong this option looks like and it perfectly aligns with our strong conclusion.
Hope it makes sense.
Let me know in case of any doubt.
Conclusion: Therefore, it is wrong for any country to adopt trade policies that are likely to seriously hinder growth in the prosperity of any other country.
This is a judgement that the negotiator is passing that IT IS WRONG to adopt trade policies which have the probability of hindering growth for the other country.
If we notice this judgement, it sounds STRONG.
(A)- Every country should adopt at least some policies that encourage the development of political freedom in other countries.
This means at least some policies should support the growth, which also means that there may be some policies that do not support. But our conclusion is strongly saying it is wrong to have a negative policy only. Therefore it is wrong.
(B)- Overall well being is out of scope.
(C)- Why a country seeks economic prosperity is irrelevant to the conclusion.
(E)- Conclusion is concerned about other countries option is about our country. Clearly, going in wrong direction.
This lefts us with D
Notice how strong this option looks like and it perfectly aligns with our strong conclusion.
Hope it makes sense.
Let me know in case of any doubt.
21 Jul 2026, 23:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
Trade negotiator: Increasing economic prosperity in a country tends to bring political freedom to its inhabitants. Therefore, it is wrong for any country to adopt trade policies that are likely to seriously hinder growth in the prosperity of any other country.
Increase EP--> PF in a country
So, ANY country should not have trade policies that negatively effect growth of ANY OTHER country
Which one of the following principles, if valid, would most help to justify the trade negotiator's reasoning?
(A) Every country should adopt at least some policies that encourage the development of political freedom in other countries.
At least some means 1 minimum, but the rest 99 can hinder growth, in a way it can weaken the conclusion
(B) Both economic prosperity and political freedom can contribute to the overall well-being of any country's inhabitants.
No impact since we already know this
(C) The primary reason that any country seeks economic prosperity is to foster political freedom in that country.
No impact we do know this, only additional check is the primary word
(D) A country should not do anything that might hinder the growth of political freedom in any other country.
Got this by POE
but this perfectly fits as it says that any country should not have policies affecting political freedom growth of any other country.
We know EP--> PF
EP of other country (coming from conclusion) ---> PF of other country (coming from option)
(E) It is wrong for any country to adopt trade policies that might diminish the prosperity of its inhabitants.
No impact since we care about other countries
Increase EP--> PF in a country
So, ANY country should not have trade policies that negatively effect growth of ANY OTHER country
Which one of the following principles, if valid, would most help to justify the trade negotiator's reasoning?
(A) Every country should adopt at least some policies that encourage the development of political freedom in other countries.
At least some means 1 minimum, but the rest 99 can hinder growth, in a way it can weaken the conclusion
(B) Both economic prosperity and political freedom can contribute to the overall well-being of any country's inhabitants.
No impact since we already know this
(C) The primary reason that any country seeks economic prosperity is to foster political freedom in that country.
No impact we do know this, only additional check is the primary word
(D) A country should not do anything that might hinder the growth of political freedom in any other country.
Got this by POE
but this perfectly fits as it says that any country should not have policies affecting political freedom growth of any other country.
We know EP--> PF
EP of other country (coming from conclusion) ---> PF of other country (coming from option)
(E) It is wrong for any country to adopt trade policies that might diminish the prosperity of its inhabitants.
No impact since we care about other countries
