People with health insurance are drastically more likely to seek

Question

People with health insurance are drastically more likely to seek a second opinion, after being examined by a qualified physician. Proportionally, more people in the 40-60 year age range have health insurance than in the 20-40 year range. Yet, oddly enough, the latest records show that people in the 40-60 year age range are no more likely to seek a second opinion than are those in the 20-40 age range.

Of the following, which, if true, best resolves the paradox seen above?

A. People with no health insurance were more likely to buy health insurance if they were over the age of 40 than if they were under that age.
B. Some people in the 20-40 age range have health insurance that covers more ailments than do some people in the 40-60 age range.
C. People generally do not seek a second opinion, unless it is from a physician more qualified than the one who first examined them.
D. Among all people with health insurance, the proportion of adults who sought second opinions declined in the last few years.
E. People who believe they are too young to acquire health issues are more likely than others to seek a second opinion.

This is a  CR Butler Question

Check the links to other Butler Projects:
 
  Data Sufficiency Butler  
  Problem Solving Butler  
  Reading Comprehension Butler

vasu1104 · Answer

people with health insurance - more likely to seek for second opinion after being examined. 
 more people in 40-60 years have health insurance than in 20-40 years. 
 but people i n 40-60 years age are no more likely to seek second opinion than are people in 20-40 age range.

A. People with no health insurance were more likely to buy health insurance if they were over the age of 40 than if they were under that age. 
 we are only concerned with people who has health insurance and who falls into either of the category mentioned. this has no impact. out.

B. Some people in the 20-40 age range have health insurance that covers more ailments than do some people in the 40-60 age range. 
 so they have some additional stuff covered in their insurance. good to know. but that doesnt tell me why 4060 age group are no more likely to seek second opinion. ans also some could be very less people compared to people in opposite age range group. reject.

C. People generally do not seek a second opinion, unless it is from a physician more qualified than the one who first examined them. 
 then changed the physician from now. irrelevant.

D. Among all people with health insurance, the proportion of adults who sought second opinions declined in the last few years. 
 but it could be from either of category and we also dont know individual people in each category so we cant say how much drop each category has seen. reject.

E. People who believe they are too young to acquire health issues are more likely than others to seek a second opinion. 
 perfect. if young people are too concerned with their health and want to make sure that they have some health issue, they will double check for assurance. that means despite having less num of people in this group the total numb of double check up goes up. so this solves the mystery mentioned in passage.

postAlone · Answer

The correct answer is  E .

The Paradox
 
  Fact:  Health insurance usually leads to more second opinions. 
  Data:  The 40–60 age group has more insurance than the 20–40 group. 
  The Conflict:  Despite the insurance gap, both groups seek second opinions at the same rate.

Why E Resolves It

Option E  introduces a behavioral offset: younger people (20–40) are more likely to seek a second opinion because they are shocked by a diagnosis at their age ("I'm too young for this!"). This increased motivation in the younger group compensates for their lower insurance rates, leveling the final statistics.
Why others fail 
 
  A & D:  These describe general trends but don't explain why the two specific groups have equal rates. 
  B:  "Some" is too weak to shift population-wide data. 
  C:  This applies to everyone and doesn't address the age or insurance difference.

Adit_ · Answer

Option E  seems to be the only option that seems to explain the paradox of why people under the age of 40 are getting a second opinion over people over that age.

WiziusCareers1 · Answer

1. Breakdown of the Paradox 
To solve this, we first need to isolate the "Expected Outcome" versus the "Actual Reality."
 Fact 1:  Having insurance makes you drastically more likely to get a second opinion.
 Fact 2:  The 40–60 group has insurance much more often than the 20–40 group.
 The Expected Outcome:  Naturally, we expect the 40–60 group to seek second opinions much more often.
 The Reality (The Paradox):  Despite having more insurance, the 40–60 group is no more likely to get a second opinion than the younger group.
 The Mission:  Find a reason why the younger group is "leveling the playing field" even though they have less insurance.

2. Evaluating the Options 
A. Buying habits of people over 40
 Incorrect.  This explains how they got insurance, but it doesn't explain their behavior regarding second opinions. It actually reinforces the idea that the older group has more insurance, which makes the paradox even more confusing.

B. Specifics of what the insurance covers
 Incorrect.  The prompt says insurance in general makes people more likely to seek a second opinion. Getting into the "weeds" of which ailments are covered for "some" people doesn't address the broad statistical discrepancy between the two age groups.

C. Qualifications of the doctor
 Incorrect.  This applies to everyone equally. If both age groups only seek opinions from more qualified doctors, it doesn't explain why the insured group (40–60) isn't using that insurance to find those better doctors more often.

D. Declining trends in second opinions
 Incorrect.  If the trend is declining for all people with insurance, the 40–60 group (who have more insurance) should still be seeking opinions more often than the 20–40 group. A general decline doesn't explain the lack of a gap between the two specific groups.

E. The "Youthful Confidence" factor
 Correct.  This introduces a competing motivation.
The 40–60 group is driven by Insurance (high motivation).
The 20–40 group is driven by Psychology (the belief they are too young to be sick, leading them to question a diagnosis).
If the younger group is naturally more skeptical or surprised by a health issue, they will seek a second opinion even without insurance. This psychological drive compensates for their lack of insurance, bringing their total percentage of second opinions up to the same level as the older, insured group.

3. Visualizing the Logic 
You can think of this like a seesaw. On one side, "Insurance" is pushing the 40–60 group's numbers up. To balance the seesaw, we need a different force pushing the 20–40 group's numbers up. Choice E provides that force.
By identifying a unique trait of the younger group (skepticism due to age), the "odd" statistical tie is finally explained.

BongBideshini · Answer

Paradox: 
 
 Insurance -> more likely to seek second opinion  
 Age 40–60 -> more insured
So they should seek  more  second opinions
 BUT they don’t   
We need a factor that makes  younger people seek more second opinions or older people seek less second opinions

Evaluate choices
 A  – People with no health insurance were more likely to buy health insurance if they were over the age of 40 than if they were under that age. 
> Doesn’t affect behavior of seeking second opinion

B  – Some people in the 20-40 age range have health insurance that covers more ailments than do some people in the 40-60 age range. 
>"some" is too weak to explain behavior difference

C  – People generally do not seek a second opinion, unless it is from a physician more qualified than the one who first examined them. 
>Applies equally to both groups

D  – Among all people with health insurance, the proportion of adults who sought second opinions declined in the last few years. 
>Doesn’t explain age-group comparison

E  – People who believe they are too young to acquire health issues are more likely than others to seek a second opinion.
> This boosts second-opinion rate in 20–40 group

Resolves paradox

Answer: E

ExpertsGlobal5 · Answer

E is the best choice.

Video explanation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Gl3K6FwGsE

People with health insurance are drastically more likely to seek

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

People with health insurance are drastically more likely to seek

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards